Win / KotakuInAction2
KotakuInAction2
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
KotakuInAction2 The Official Gamergate Forum
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

40
Reset the clock again, CIA edition (archive.md)
posted 4 years ago by ailurus 4 years ago by ailurus +40 / -0
23 comments share
23 comments share save hide report block hide replies
Comments (23)
sorted by:
▲ 22 ▼
– KeeperOfTheGate 22 points 4 years ago +22 / -0

I briefly worked for the CIA more than 10 years ago. It costs the govt a great deal of money to hire a CIA employee. There are multiple rounds of interviews and background checks; they send investigators out to your workplace, school, family members, friends, etc; there are multiple rounds of polygraph testing. Once you're in, you're in.

The only case I ever heard of anyone getting fired was some dumbass who looked at child porn on the company network. Yes, the CIA's network, probably one of the most monitored networks in the world.

The CIA also has something like 30,000+ employees ("blue badges") and god knows how many contractors ("green badges").

permalink save report block reply
▲ 8 ▼
– MrGiggles 8 points 4 years ago +8 / -0

Given how every CIA operation somehow involves creating a child sex trafficking network, I'm shocked they fired the guy for looking at child porn. I'd expect them to give him a hi five or something.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– Xzal 5 points 4 years ago +5 / -0

Person in question probably left too many trails, made it too obv. The stuck out nail and all that.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– CarmenOfSandiego 5 points 4 years ago +5 / -0

The only case I ever heard of anyone getting fired was some dumbass who looked at child porn on the company network. Yes, the CIA's network, probably one of the most monitored networks in the world.

So they were browsing Reddit?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 16 ▼
– deleted 16 points 4 years ago +16 / -0
▲ 13 ▼
– KeeperOfTheGate 13 points 4 years ago +13 / -0

Hah, I don't think I count as a glowy if I quit AND acknowledge that I worked there.

Hell, it was largely that experience that made me as anti-government and anti-bureaucracy and anti-elite (CIA is fucking full of the elite) as I am.

Won't get into anything close to accurate details to avoid dox, but it was 10+ years ago, and I was hired in the analytical division (the "DI").

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– fauxgnaws 5 points 4 years ago +5 / -0

Depends. Once a spook always a spook for some things, like holding office.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 8 ▼
– KeeperOfTheGate 8 points 4 years ago +8 / -0

I think that's true for most people.

The CIA was all about being part of the CIA as the head of the Intelligence Community. From day one, Entrance on Duty (EOD) training, the teachers went out of their way to tell you how you were special as the top of the IC, how the CIA operated independently of individual politicians, etc. The first 10 days were full of propaganda about CIA successes, how instrumental it was in various geopolitical actions, etc. Total indoctrination.

I honest to god knew within 10 minutes it was not going to work out for me.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– Xzal 3 points 4 years ago +3 / -0

So if that induction was applied in say a civilian setting.. it would be classified as a cult. Right?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– fauxgnaws 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0

I don't mean individually you're untrustworthy, but as a class it's impossible to tell the difference between you and somebody just lying about rejecting the Company so they can get elected and take orders from John Brennan.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– KeeperOfTheGate 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0

True enough. I would be very cautious about voting for anyone who worked at CIA (or any government agency) and was proud of it.

Military service a bit different.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– VA-Pede 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0

Looking at you, Mat Best.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– MargarineMongoose 3 points 4 years ago +3 / -0

Hell, it was largely that experience that made me as anti-government and anti-bureaucracy and anti-elite (CIA is fucking full of the elite) as I am.

This.

People who work for the government either directly or as a contractor end up with front row seats to just how horrible things are on the inside and become revolted if they weren't already.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Assassin47 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0

Hah, I don't think I count as a glowy if I quit AND acknowledge that I worked there.

Well... I can't say it applies to you, but it's actually a pretty common tactic for "former" agents to be completely honest about their "former" association with their new targets. It builds trust they exploit to give disinformation, and explains away any inconsistencies in their background if by chance they are ever found out. I suppose that tactic wouldn't make sense on an anonymous message board.

As an aside, what do you think of the rumor that they moved most of their real ops to the National Endowment for Democracy? The stuff at Langley is just a cover.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– KeeperOfTheGate 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0

As an aside, what do you think of the rumor that they moved most of their real ops to the National Endowment for Democracy? The stuff at Langley is just a cover.

Never heard of that. Literally tens of thousands of people work on Langley. Most of them are juts desk jockeys, support staff, etc. The real secret stuff is what used to be called the DO / Directorate of Operations and is now called NCS / National Clandestine Service. That's like a minority of CIA employees, but there are the real spies. The most undercover people are NOCs ... Non-official cover. CIA employees who never set foot in Langley (McLean), might spend their entire career working for Microsoft, or Bob's Widgets, or whatever, but who are secretly CIA agents working deep under cover.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 7 ▼
– deleted 7 points 4 years ago +7 / -0
▲ 8 ▼
– xleb2 8 points 4 years ago +8 / -0

Who even runs the CIA now?

Bill Burns. Look into it.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– deleted 4 points 4 years ago +4 / -0
▲ 11 ▼
– xleb2 11 points 4 years ago +11 / -0

He's a creepy weirdo from the deep state who has been around the block for 40 years. Have interacted with the guy; persona of the shadows. Utterly questionable.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– deleted 6 points 4 years ago +6 / -0
▲ 12 ▼
– deleted 12 points 4 years ago +12 / -0
▲ 4 ▼
– deleted 4 points 4 years ago +4 / -0
▲ 4 ▼
– TentElephant 4 points 4 years ago +4 / -0

This isn't just some guy that got appointed to be a diplomat as part of usual political back scratching. He has spent his entire working life in the foreign service, one of the most child-rapey evil organizations in the world.

permalink parent save report block reply

Original 8chan Links to Gamer Gate:

.

The main GG discussion is on the videogames board: https://8chan.moe/v/

.

GamerGate archive is at https://8chan.moe/gamergatehq/

.

GamerGate Wiki:

https://ggwiki.deepfreeze.it/index.php/Main_Page

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Rules:

.

ONE: Do not advocate for illegal violence or post other illegal activity. (Be aware of your local laws.)

.

TWO: Don't threaten, harass, or impersonate users. Also: don't be a psycho. New users will be held to a higher standard.

.

THREE: Do not post porn.

.

FOUR: NSFW/NSFL content must be flaired NSFW.

.

FIVE: No vote manipulation. Do not break communities.win's features.

.

SIX: No spam or reposts. Do not make more than 5 threads a day.

.

SEVEN: Do not post falsehoods and hoaxes that are obvious to an uncontroversial degree.

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Moderation Logs:

.

(Two different versions, Scored has more features and is cleaner, but .win let's you see a few more details in certain instances.)

  • Scored
  • .win

Moderators

  • DomitiusOfMassilia
  • C
  • BandageBandolier
  • CarmenOfSandiego
  • The_Shadow_of_Intent
  • SocraticMethod1
  • Kienan
  • Smith1980
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2026.02.01 - w2qgj (status)

Copyright © 2026.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy