He has been beating this drum for a while. He makes a lot of good points. I know I used to ignore a lot of cultural stuff or I would dismiss woke stuff as something that is only at the university. Also I dismissed AOC but she is wildly popular
Yeah something he doesn't want to mention is when the right had culture and the legal infrastructure to maintain it, the left subverted the legal infrastructure by telling them "you need to be tolerant of people who have other cultures". And the libertarians sided with the left.
The only libertarians whose conscious is clear in this regard are the Hoppeans.
Democracy: The God That Failed is probably his most popular book.
He believes that one's ability to set rules in a jurisdiction is based on one's ownership of that land and private contracts between the landowner and those who live on the land. It's a sort of monarchy except that it's derived from property ownership instead of ordained by God, and one's obligations to the landowner are specified through private contract instead of absolute. He believes an core requirement of this private contract is a prohibition on advocates of communism and democracy and that people who agitate for those things ought to be "forcibly removed" from society. Hence the meme.
The right loses for various reasons, but mainly because they are generations behind in multiple domains.
Have a read of this, it's long but around the middle is specifies multiple domains of the country that the left has not only willing volunteers but an entire infrastructure to fight the culture war.
The reason it's like this is because of the cold war. The reason it never went hot is because the US and Soviet union were both playing to their strengths, and this meant they never met. It's like expecting a boxer and a swimmer to have a bout, and wondering why the fight never happens.
The left was funded for decades by the soviet union, and has been funded enough that it's now self sustaining, the rainbow grift is a parasite that now sucks up a large amount of the US GDP and ensures that those resources are available to the left.
Why does the right lose? because no-one is being paid to push back against this shit.
The only parallel is a parallel economy. Take the Daily Wire as probably the most well funded example of "conservative entertainment" Ben shapiro is being paid to talk, he's not being paid to do anything.
The left has hundreds and hundreds of NGO's and not for profits who employ people to organise rallies, take out ads on fb, put up flyers etc etc etc.
This used to be funded by the soviet union, but since they well it's become a self perpetuating funding model as the ideological drive stems from academia, who requires no funding.
Train up enough people in grievance studies and your company is filled with them, so when the board decides on a "200 million dollar diversity initiative" instead of the proposal being laughed out of the room, every single person who gives an opinion/evidence to it's effectiveness says it's a good idea.
Tell me about it. I remember someone saying he tap dances for whites people. I was like so he is a bad person because he refuses to succumb to the victim mentality?
Yes, the black man who traveled the world studying numerous ethnicities and how they adapted over time is a white supremacist because he doesn’t see American Blacks as special victims. If we were honestly talking about one of the least racist people in existence and frankly, the best argument for black Americans ability to achieve greatness, it is Sowell. Sadly, this is also the same reason the leftists revile him.
Every time I see this I know there's some left-wing political operative laughing their ass off that they got a bunch of "conservative" sources to redistribute their propaganda picture and imagery.
They also have a hard time identifying their enemies as such.
Bingo.
There's also the problem of there being entirely too many conservatives who think their job is just to slow down rather than actually STOP leftists.
Stopping them isnt enough. All their "victories" must be completely undone, and their crimes must be immortalized in history.
He has been beating this drum for a while. He makes a lot of good points. I know I used to ignore a lot of cultural stuff or I would dismiss woke stuff as something that is only at the university. Also I dismissed AOC but she is wildly popular
He’s libertarian. He’s a huge part of the problem.
Yeah something he doesn't want to mention is when the right had culture and the legal infrastructure to maintain it, the left subverted the legal infrastructure by telling them "you need to be tolerant of people who have other cultures". And the libertarians sided with the left.
The only libertarians whose conscious is clear in this regard are the Hoppeans.
I’ve been meaning to read up on Hoppe. What makes him different than mainstream libertarians? He written any good books?
Democracy: The God That Failed is probably his most popular book.
He believes that one's ability to set rules in a jurisdiction is based on one's ownership of that land and private contracts between the landowner and those who live on the land. It's a sort of monarchy except that it's derived from property ownership instead of ordained by God, and one's obligations to the landowner are specified through private contract instead of absolute. He believes an core requirement of this private contract is a prohibition on advocates of communism and democracy and that people who agitate for those things ought to be "forcibly removed" from society. Hence the meme.
"Physically removed" (so to speak).
Shit it is "physically" isn't it? Oh well.
Ohh. Ok. I wondered where that came from. Thanks!
And so many libertarians crave approval from the left.
Honestly, libertarian is a bastardized term as much as liberal is today. Libertarians today range from old school hippies to anarcho capitalism lite.
Because he's not a conservative is why conservatives lose? He might be proud of that judgement.
"Just stop believing that stupid shit you believe! If only you were on my side we could beat those <bad guys>!"
Or more likely from the cons, "Grow up, nobody cares about vidya games and comic books."
There's a big difference between Libertarian with a capital L and libertarian with a lowercase l.
I was about to say libertarian is fine as long as you're principled, but then I realized that's pretty much just a conservative lol.
The right loses for various reasons, but mainly because they are generations behind in multiple domains.
Have a read of this, it's long but around the middle is specifies multiple domains of the country that the left has not only willing volunteers but an entire infrastructure to fight the culture war.
The reason it's like this is because of the cold war. The reason it never went hot is because the US and Soviet union were both playing to their strengths, and this meant they never met. It's like expecting a boxer and a swimmer to have a bout, and wondering why the fight never happens.
The left was funded for decades by the soviet union, and has been funded enough that it's now self sustaining, the rainbow grift is a parasite that now sucks up a large amount of the US GDP and ensures that those resources are available to the left.
Why does the right lose? because no-one is being paid to push back against this shit. The only parallel is a parallel economy. Take the Daily Wire as probably the most well funded example of "conservative entertainment" Ben shapiro is being paid to talk, he's not being paid to do anything.
The left has hundreds and hundreds of NGO's and not for profits who employ people to organise rallies, take out ads on fb, put up flyers etc etc etc.
This used to be funded by the soviet union, but since they well it's become a self perpetuating funding model as the ideological drive stems from academia, who requires no funding.
Train up enough people in grievance studies and your company is filled with them, so when the board decides on a "200 million dollar diversity initiative" instead of the proposal being laughed out of the room, every single person who gives an opinion/evidence to it's effectiveness says it's a good idea.
That Sowell poster is what I wish drove hope and change.
Tell me about it. I remember someone saying he tap dances for whites people. I was like so he is a bad person because he refuses to succumb to the victim mentality?
Yes, the black man who traveled the world studying numerous ethnicities and how they adapted over time is a white supremacist because he doesn’t see American Blacks as special victims. If we were honestly talking about one of the least racist people in existence and frankly, the best argument for black Americans ability to achieve greatness, it is Sowell. Sadly, this is also the same reason the leftists revile him.
Sad but true
Conservatives lose for two reasons:
The ones in power are controlled opposition
The average, everyday one is taught by the CO's in power to be a spineless beta for moral reasons, and they go along with it.
Its an ideology of cuckery, and always has been.
Every time I see this I know there's some left-wing political operative laughing their ass off that they got a bunch of "conservative" sources to redistribute their propaganda picture and imagery.
No wonder they keep winning.