Does anyone find it strange that THIS whistleblower is the one that the federal government and other corporate media is listening to? There's been numerous big tech whistleblowers in the past, but they've all been from right-wing platforms, and even some left-wing ones, but I've noticed the only time this seems to have gained any sort of traction is because it involves young children, and more "importantly", young WOMEN.
So it's that meme narrative - social media is making us crazy, women most affected.
From a "red pill" standpoint, the lady who is doing the whistleblowing is in her late 30's. I can't tell what the fuck she made because all the articles about her just copy-pastas her profile, but apparently she's a software engineer, which is as ambiguous of a term as someone who farts into the wind. She doesn't really talk about being married all that much, mostly seems to be a carrier-oriented "independent wamen".
I'm trying to figure out what's so brave about something everyone knew from just anecdotally looking at evidence. Why is she being considered brave for saying something we all already knew?
Because she's speaking the talking points. Simple as that. They will use this to push for more restrictions on speech. It won't really hurt Facebook in the long run so they won't care.
They planted her. They are not journalists. They are the propaganda machine.
https://greenwald.substack.com/p/democrats-and-media-do-not-want-to
Democrats and Media Do Not Want to Weaken Facebook, Just Commandeer its Power to Censor
"Whistleblower" Frances Haugen is a vital media and political asset because she advances their quest for greater control over online political discourse.
This is all a push to clamp down on free speech. She’s not a whistleblower, they don’t get 60 minutes interviews, she’s a scripted “victim” who screams about “misinformation” so government can regulate speech.
Yep, that's what it feels like. The amount of glowing she's doing is ridiculous.
100% this.
When I saw it trending on Twitter the first thing I thought was "Why isn't she on Project Veritas and why is Twitter promoting a whistleblower? Must be a psyop."
Did you do any research?
She's a plant to get the government a public justification for further control over speech.
Yes, that is why I am asking the question for discussion. This lady glows so much I think she could light the entire country of fucking North Korea at this point.
Because it's the one that will lead to full control of social media and speech by the matriarchy.
Gotta ban that "misogyny" before people start connecting their constant remarks to kill all men to the vax they approved.
Because it is a fake whistleblower just like Vindman
She's in on it. Probably CIA but at a minimum she's being handled by a CIA agent. They probably coached her on how to safely remove all of the sensitive information they needed.
Psyop to get the public to accept more censorship.
There was a real whistelblower, who got deleted. Coincidentally, Facebook was aware of evidence that corroborated whistleblower's intel as fact, and couldn't be gotten rid of without going "Hilary Clinton" on their servers. In turn, they revealed their "I got hacked" trap card and summoned a fugly, fat actress/intern to do damage control.
It's my theory and I'm sticking to it.
Obvious glowie is obvious.
And yet, some people have on blinders so tight that they can't see the glow.
Because she's calling for more regulation to save the moral foundation of this country, and there's nothing more American than that, that's what we've been doing since prohibition and pietism. Nothing gets the news more excited when companies become big enough to join to corpofascist club and in this case they can advance regulations against the entire internet while focusing on speech. Nationalization will follow after a matter of time and then the abomination sews another power structure into itself.
Because when they aren’t blaming gamergate for them losing elections they blame Facebook for not censoring the right hard enough.
That's pretty much exactly what happened to Maxime Bernier, leader of the based People's Party of Canada.
He posted a tweet showing three MSM members sending the party emails phishing for sandbagging interviews with "we'd like to ask you a few questions on why your white supremacist party attracts so many racists that commit so many hate crimes".
He published the email requests along with the work emails of the three MSM members.
Twitter suspended his account and made him take the tweets down.
The journalists complained they were being "doxxed" and started posting some of the mean emails they got for victim points.
The MSM used the whole thing to show how "far right" and dangerous Bernier and the PPC are.
Just today, some national union of journalists called the incident out as an example that journalists needed to be protected and that "hate speech" is a rising problem.