Does anyone find it strange that THIS whistleblower is the one that the federal government and other corporate media is listening to? There's been numerous big tech whistleblowers in the past, but they've all been from right-wing platforms, and even some left-wing ones, but I've noticed the only time this seems to have gained any sort of traction is because it involves young children, and more "importantly", young WOMEN.
So it's that meme narrative - social media is making us crazy, women most affected.
From a "red pill" standpoint, the lady who is doing the whistleblowing is in her late 30's. I can't tell what the fuck she made because all the articles about her just copy-pastas her profile, but apparently she's a software engineer, which is as ambiguous of a term as someone who farts into the wind. She doesn't really talk about being married all that much, mostly seems to be a carrier-oriented "independent wamen".
I'm trying to figure out what's so brave about something everyone knew from just anecdotally looking at evidence. Why is she being considered brave for saying something we all already knew?
That's pretty much exactly what happened to Maxime Bernier, leader of the based People's Party of Canada.
He posted a tweet showing three MSM members sending the party emails phishing for sandbagging interviews with "we'd like to ask you a few questions on why your white supremacist party attracts so many racists that commit so many hate crimes".
He published the email requests along with the work emails of the three MSM members.
Twitter suspended his account and made him take the tweets down.
The journalists complained they were being "doxxed" and started posting some of the mean emails they got for victim points.
The MSM used the whole thing to show how "far right" and dangerous Bernier and the PPC are.
Just today, some national union of journalists called the incident out as an example that journalists needed to be protected and that "hate speech" is a rising problem.