God help us, Postmodernism and Critical Theory are intellectual malignancy.
Forget all the big words and the permutations - they are literally trying to twist logic to argue against morality. It's the same thing they do with literally everything.
Forget the sexuality arguments - take a simpler example: stealing.
Thou shalt not steal. Stealing is wrong. This is true in every human culture that I can think of save for some Pacific Islander nations where there was no external threat and they lived in relative abundance (but they are obviously the exception to the rule).
But is stealing always wrong? What about the person who steals to feed their starving family? There's a moral exception there.
Because black people have historically had a harder time feeding their families, and have historically suffered under unfair legal treatment, it should be excusable when they steal.
Throw some more buzzwords in there, hire an intellectual to make it sound compassionate and smart, and boom, this is how we arrived at San Francisco refusing to prosecute shoplifting.
The only problem -- this is staring into the abyss. And the abyss, by definition, has no bottom.
I don't understand everything you just said but I probably agree?
Anyway deconstruction applies perfectly here because that's the core tactic underlying critical theory. It is a mental framework common to all liberalism, but taken to the extreme with the postmodern movement. You take a world view that was always known to be accepted and correct, and analyze it from the point of view of being just one alternative on a spectrum of multiple alternatives. Then when your ideology "wins", suddenly what was normal before becomes a fringe belief.
It's not so much that I am no longer a lesbian, then, it's that the binary of gay and straight no longer has anything to do with me. My preference these days is canine.
All this has ever been is the promotion of degeneracy. From the very beginning these deviants wanted society remade in their image. This means they must completely destroy heteronormativity, they have repeatedly admitted this and this was the basis of “gender theory”. This is why everyone must be non binary, why everyone must use pronouns, any semblance of normal or natural must be destroyed.
Some of you folks may be too young to remember this, but in 2006 there was a case at Duke where a stripper claimed she was raped by 3 men at a Duke Lacrosse party attended by 30 people. Everyone there said it didn’t happen. The DA, Mike Nifong, was in an election and falsified evidence and used that to arrest 3 men. These men were paraded out in front of a gaggle of cameras for televised perp walks and called vile things by the MSM.
88 Duke professors signed a petition with a list of insane demands.
It was an utter shitshow. The DNA evidence was totally false. A judge let the men go. Nifong actually got arrested and disbarred. The media ran with nothing but a narrative for an extended period and then when it fell apart it was like “welp, nothing to see here.”
Just wait, In ten years “conservatives” will be perfectly fine with beastiality.
Democrats are the real beastialiphobes!
Depends if women want them to be.
Remember how they targeted those who voted for women to be drafted?
Necrophilia has always been a conservative value
Never forget your Mortal Kombat, beastiality is bestiality :)
God help us, Postmodernism and Critical Theory are intellectual malignancy.
Forget all the big words and the permutations - they are literally trying to twist logic to argue against morality. It's the same thing they do with literally everything.
Forget the sexuality arguments - take a simpler example: stealing.
Thou shalt not steal. Stealing is wrong. This is true in every human culture that I can think of save for some Pacific Islander nations where there was no external threat and they lived in relative abundance (but they are obviously the exception to the rule).
But is stealing always wrong? What about the person who steals to feed their starving family? There's a moral exception there.
Because black people have historically had a harder time feeding their families, and have historically suffered under unfair legal treatment, it should be excusable when they steal.
Throw some more buzzwords in there, hire an intellectual to make it sound compassionate and smart, and boom, this is how we arrived at San Francisco refusing to prosecute shoplifting.
The only problem -- this is staring into the abyss. And the abyss, by definition, has no bottom.
Human reason is imperfect. Postmodernism proved we can deconstruct anything, and rationalize away what we don't like.
I don't understand everything you just said but I probably agree?
Anyway deconstruction applies perfectly here because that's the core tactic underlying critical theory. It is a mental framework common to all liberalism, but taken to the extreme with the postmodern movement. You take a world view that was always known to be accepted and correct, and analyze it from the point of view of being just one alternative on a spectrum of multiple alternatives. Then when your ideology "wins", suddenly what was normal before becomes a fringe belief.
The author:
/dogpill
Debased and dogpilled.
Is that real...? Has she really acknowledged the deprave act of having sex with dogs?
It's real.
All this has ever been is the promotion of degeneracy. From the very beginning these deviants wanted society remade in their image. This means they must completely destroy heteronormativity, they have repeatedly admitted this and this was the basis of “gender theory”. This is why everyone must be non binary, why everyone must use pronouns, any semblance of normal or natural must be destroyed.
It's the same picture.
who could have possibly predicted this outcome?
Some of you folks may be too young to remember this, but in 2006 there was a case at Duke where a stripper claimed she was raped by 3 men at a Duke Lacrosse party attended by 30 people. Everyone there said it didn’t happen. The DA, Mike Nifong, was in an election and falsified evidence and used that to arrest 3 men. These men were paraded out in front of a gaggle of cameras for televised perp walks and called vile things by the MSM.
88 Duke professors signed a petition with a list of insane demands.
It was an utter shitshow. The DNA evidence was totally false. A judge let the men go. Nifong actually got arrested and disbarred. The media ran with nothing but a narrative for an extended period and then when it fell apart it was like “welp, nothing to see here.”
I feel sorry for the dogs, but if they can convince all the feminists to not chase men, that's surely good for everyone?
So, not much change for the Fourth Reich, who see every relationship as an opportunity for financial exploitation.
It'll never happen because the Fourth Reich wouldn't allow it to. That's their main financial inflow.