A good chunk of this sexual liberation nonsense started with madmen like Kinsey and Money performing literal sexual experiments on children and infants. Anyone with eyes to see could have seen this coming.
I'd have to do some digging, I read it in a book... probably over a decade ago now. But apparantly a lot of his research involved molesting the children of willing parents as test subjects and reporting their obvious discomfort and pain as "orgasm" and the like, since they were too young to speak. The description stuck with me, for how depraved it was, and how people were happy to go along with it, since it supported their presuppositions about sexuality. But, again, I read the source for this years ago, so don't take my word as gospel.
Even if your word isn't true, his Wikipedia alone is damning. And that's the sanitized version Wikipedia would let you read, so you can only fill in the blanks with the more horrific shit they are hiding. He was openly recruiting pedophiles to "inform" him all the juicy details of how children reacted to being raped.
Its amazing how all these landmark researchers for sexual liberation and LGBT rights are also massive child predators.
Non-leftists really dropped the ball. It would've been a lot easier to deal with the things these people are writing decades ago before they really got going with their influence
At this point I don't even think that's appropriate. State control of what gets taught to our children has turned into brainwashing propaganda and degeneracy, meant to influence our kids a certain way, think the way they want, say what they want, do what they want, and not otherwise. Lefties don't have enough kids for their movement to remain stable and long lasting. Lefties breed by indoctrinating our kids into their movement, which is done through TV, music, globohomo culture, social media, mainstream media, and education.
Humans have been around a long time, most of which didn't require telling teens how to have kids, and the human race did just fine. Seriously, if someone is too stupid to figure it out, they don't deserve to have kids.
By what standard do you make that argument? That in first grade they aren't sexually mature? They'll use that as an argument why it should be taught: so they're not caught unaware once they are. That they won't understand? They'll pull out some study that "shows" they do.
And they've been quite open about this for almost 20 years. This is Jocelyn Elders, US Surgeon General of the United States in 1994 during a UN AIDS conference. She was fired for saying the quiet part out loud too early.
As per your specific question in regard to masturbation, I think that is something that is a part of human sexuality and it's a part of something that perhaps should be taught. But we've not even taught our children the very basics. And I feel that we have tried ignorance for a very long time and it's time we try education.
That certain women would live out their pedo fantasies?
They opposed sex ed because it threatened their failing and heavily propped up marriage institution. If young adults knew they could have sex safely without pregnancy, the tradcon sex before marriage ploy wouldn't work.
I'm still shocked women didn't realize their meal ticket was slipping away.
Less and less soft targets existing, hence the massive drive to take over society quickly.
As with women and their motivations today, Christians and traditionalists had multiple reasons for opposing sex education in schools. Even the major influencers in those groups don't all act in lockstep. Protecting marriage through the sanctification of sex is only one reason only some people had.
When they didn't, the states required that sex ed be part of all school curricula. In some cases it mandated that certain things (eg. condom use) be taught as part of that curriculum.
My private Christian high school was required by law to teach both, and they made sure to tell us all they were doing it under protest.
Yet another thing the Christians were right about 30 years ago when sex ed entered the public school curriculum.
A good chunk of this sexual liberation nonsense started with madmen like Kinsey and Money performing literal sexual experiments on children and infants. Anyone with eyes to see could have seen this coming.
I feel stupid for never having thought to look into Kinsey. Holy shit! Sexual Behavior In The Human Male has well documented child rape.
Spez: Table 34
Dear god, 5 months? It’s disgusting and amoral for early teens, but for literal infants? Cruel and unjust are understatements.
Wow and I thought A Serbian Film was fiction...
Incredible.
What is the source for these quotes?
Wow I knew her from when she spoke to Jordan Peterson. She seemed normal but this is insanity.
Woah, I knew the stuff about Money but what's the scoop on Kinsey?
I'd have to do some digging, I read it in a book... probably over a decade ago now. But apparantly a lot of his research involved molesting the children of willing parents as test subjects and reporting their obvious discomfort and pain as "orgasm" and the like, since they were too young to speak. The description stuck with me, for how depraved it was, and how people were happy to go along with it, since it supported their presuppositions about sexuality. But, again, I read the source for this years ago, so don't take my word as gospel.
Even if your word isn't true, his Wikipedia alone is damning. And that's the sanitized version Wikipedia would let you read, so you can only fill in the blanks with the more horrific shit they are hiding. He was openly recruiting pedophiles to "inform" him all the juicy details of how children reacted to being raped.
Its amazing how all these landmark researchers for sexual liberation and LGBT rights are also massive child predators.
That's screwed up.
Non-leftists really dropped the ball. It would've been a lot easier to deal with the things these people are writing decades ago before they really got going with their influence
Funded by feminists, don't forget that.
Also, the woman who famously claimed women are lesbian by default was a massive pedophile.
Sex ed is fine...if you're teaching teens. And not using porn to teach.
Teaching 1st graders sex ed isn't even remotely okay. And using porn to teach any child, regardless of age, is never okay.
At this point I don't even think that's appropriate. State control of what gets taught to our children has turned into brainwashing propaganda and degeneracy, meant to influence our kids a certain way, think the way they want, say what they want, do what they want, and not otherwise. Lefties don't have enough kids for their movement to remain stable and long lasting. Lefties breed by indoctrinating our kids into their movement, which is done through TV, music, globohomo culture, social media, mainstream media, and education.
Humans have been around a long time, most of which didn't require telling teens how to have kids, and the human race did just fine. Seriously, if someone is too stupid to figure it out, they don't deserve to have kids.
By what standard do you make that argument? That in first grade they aren't sexually mature? They'll use that as an argument why it should be taught: so they're not caught unaware once they are. That they won't understand? They'll pull out some study that "shows" they do.
And they've been quite open about this for almost 20 years. This is Jocelyn Elders, US Surgeon General of the United States in 1994 during a UN AIDS conference. She was fired for saying the quiet part out loud too early.
That certain women would live out their pedo fantasies?
They opposed sex ed because it threatened their failing and heavily propped up marriage institution. If young adults knew they could have sex safely without pregnancy, the tradcon sex before marriage ploy wouldn't work.
I'm still shocked women didn't realize their meal ticket was slipping away.
Less and less soft targets existing, hence the massive drive to take over society quickly.
As with women and their motivations today, Christians and traditionalists had multiple reasons for opposing sex education in schools. Even the major influencers in those groups don't all act in lockstep. Protecting marriage through the sanctification of sex is only one reason only some people had.
It's really quite sad that you felt the need to make a third account. Or is this your main?
Take your two comment handshake account back to your feminist cesspit.
When they didn't, the states required that sex ed be part of all school curricula. In some cases it mandated that certain things (eg. condom use) be taught as part of that curriculum.
My private Christian high school was required by law to teach both, and they made sure to tell us all they were doing it under protest.
Do you do anything other than complain?
Also, calling other people dumb when you said "to dumb" is fucking rich.