This idiot is proof of how dangerous and stupid such blanket policies are, because you know he's calling things racist and bigotry that aren't. He actually seems to think there aren't more black criminals. That somehow the police are only targeting black people and all the streets are full of white thugs they just won't arrest. And if you post news stories about crimes you're playing into the fake narrative that there are more black criminals.
Now, some people posting those stories could be racists. They could be trolls. There are a lot of forum sliders on TD late at night who just post constant "get angry at this random black man in South Africa" memes to keep the mods busy. But in a forum dedicated to posting and discussing random crime stories, there's no reason to assume that. You have to separate the wheat from the chaff. Discussions about the stories could actually inspire some readers to consider what's gone wrong in our society and start thinking of solutions. Fixing the problem instead of ignoring it would help black people since they are victims of crime too. The fact this is being discussed tells me he's not using discernment to identify the real racist trolls, but just banning anything not-PC and telling himself he's against bigotry to feel good about it. If you can't point out a problem, you can't fix it.
So if he's being honest, the only way he could have such a weird idea about the "demographics of policing" is because he lives in a safe bourgeois neighborhood and has no direct experience with crime, only communicates in protected speech bubbles that don't allow deviation from Current Year PC thought, and only get his news from mainstream media that doesn't want to offend minorities. Everyone else said "it's not my problem" and did what was easy and felt good at the time, but society is less well off. He hasn't shown that he's made a "better community" at all.
The funniest thing is they out themselves as the racists they are just by trying to be "anti-racist". Talking about crime statistics? Must be black people doing all the crime- ban it. Talking about apes of any kind? CLEARLY talking about blacks and a racist dogwhistle- ban it!!! Orks > Violent, irrational, angry, terrible parents, no father figure? Basically black people- ban iiiiit~
The only reason to think black people shouldn't be mentioned when they are the perpetrator of a criminal act is if you think ALL black people are criminal, adult-children incapable of reason or civility(who look like monkeys and act like orks). They are the ones holding back the potential of minorities every time they insist they will never succeed in anything they do as long as the White Man (tm) is around to oppress [be superior] to them.
The entire sub falls under a violation of Reddit's harassment rule for being an attack on an identity group.
And the reddit admins know it, too. They banned fragile black redditor and fragile jewish redditor, so its very intentional that they left fragile white redditor.
That's exactly correct, and the "promoting hate against vulnerable groups" is built to explicitly exclude whites, straights, cisgenders, Christians, etc, from being protected by the harassment rule. Which is why I make that copypasta.
I don't have a link, it was posted on here a lot, if anyone does it's probably time to repost.
Basically they "clarified" that their rules don't apply to white or straight people because those aren't "identities" or some such bs in much more weaselly language.
No, they said that some groups (which they refused to specify) don't count as vulnerable identities.
That's why I do the "Reddit Apartheid" copypasta every time the rule gets invoked:
Reddit's recent Apartheid ruling asserts that whatever Reddit defines to be morally degenerate races are not subject to equal protection under the law. I cannot ethically abide by that. However, I can examine this work for it's possible "promotion of hate" as an extension of the harassment rule.
They specifically cited that some groups are not considered vulnerable, and the promotion of hate against them would not be covered by that rule.
They originally used the term "Majority" instead of vulnerable, but it made absolutely no sense. They were using a euphemism treadmill to cover for the fact that they believe certain demographics are inherently morally degenerate and are undeserving of equal protection
No no, there are no Fast cars, there are only Slow cars.
The disadvantaged Slow cars cannot compete on an equal playing field, and so we must reduce the speed of all cars to be equal. We cannot allow Toxic Fastness to continue to exist.
Will fragilewhiteredditor accept responsibility for this guy?
https://archive.ph/AjRzJ
https:// www. ledger-enquirer. com/news/local/crime/article252097433. html
‘I had to have him.’ Columbus police say weekend shooting spree was racially motivated
BY TIM CHITWOOD
JUNE 14, 2021 11:19 AM,
UPDATED JUNE 14, 2021 11:36 AM
The 39-year-old man charged in a weekend shooting spree told in a weekend shooting spree told Columbus police his assaults were racially motivated, targeting white men he felt had taken from him all his life, a detective testified Monday.
Though police allege Justin Tyran Roberts was involved in three separate assaults that wounded five people Friday and Saturday in Columbus and Phenix City, he was in Columbus Recorder’s Court to face charges in just one of those incidents, a shooting around 2 p.m. Saturday under the Oglethorpe Bridge at Broadway and Fourth Street.
That’s where a man was shot in the back as he was getting into his vehicle in a parking area under the bridge, said Detective Brandon Lockhart, who quoted Roberts as telling police, “I had to have him.”
“Basically, he explained throughout his life, specifically white males had taken from him, and also what he described as ‘military-looking white males’ had taken from him,” the investigator said.
Roberts also claimed that such men were “shooting at him in a wooded area with a slingshot,” and the wounds had infected his skin, Lockhart testified. Police saw no injuries to substantiate that, he said.
First, Fragile White Redditor is not dedicated to Critical Race Theory. It's just an anti-white subreddit.
Second, archive that reddit link. What we've seen is that Reddit scans links to websites that are linked to them, and uses that as a just cause for censoring other subreddits. Which means linking to them directly from here, actually puts the Reddit sub in danger.
What's that you say? We're going to need to make a "KIA3" to get away from dumbshit mods that still care about reddit? Sounds like a solid idea to me. Even now this whole site is looking more like containment than escape. Tell me why you never brought back the "contacting advertisers" thing, it was clearly effective.
Just in case you aren't a just pretending to be oblivious, it was about getting advertisers to stop supporting bullshit through emails. It was really effective, so reddit forced the mods to axe it. Of course you faggots are still concerned about reddit, so it seems pretty damn obvious why we haven't had any major threads on that so far.
Certain demographics are over represented. Not due to their own issues but due to racist policing. This mod is an idiot.
Reality is often... racist.
This idiot is proof of how dangerous and stupid such blanket policies are, because you know he's calling things racist and bigotry that aren't. He actually seems to think there aren't more black criminals. That somehow the police are only targeting black people and all the streets are full of white thugs they just won't arrest. And if you post news stories about crimes you're playing into the fake narrative that there are more black criminals.
Now, some people posting those stories could be racists. They could be trolls. There are a lot of forum sliders on TD late at night who just post constant "get angry at this random black man in South Africa" memes to keep the mods busy. But in a forum dedicated to posting and discussing random crime stories, there's no reason to assume that. You have to separate the wheat from the chaff. Discussions about the stories could actually inspire some readers to consider what's gone wrong in our society and start thinking of solutions. Fixing the problem instead of ignoring it would help black people since they are victims of crime too. The fact this is being discussed tells me he's not using discernment to identify the real racist trolls, but just banning anything not-PC and telling himself he's against bigotry to feel good about it. If you can't point out a problem, you can't fix it.
So if he's being honest, the only way he could have such a weird idea about the "demographics of policing" is because he lives in a safe bourgeois neighborhood and has no direct experience with crime, only communicates in protected speech bubbles that don't allow deviation from Current Year PC thought, and only get his news from mainstream media that doesn't want to offend minorities. Everyone else said "it's not my problem" and did what was easy and felt good at the time, but society is less well off. He hasn't shown that he's made a "better community" at all.
He's probably one of those idiots who think police were all founded to be slave-catching groups and just progressed from there.
And they never want to talk about solutions to these high crime areas because that would involve abandoning the popular narratives
"Certain demographics are over-represented", so it must be because of secret racism. Disparate Impact Hypothesis in Action.
The funniest thing is they out themselves as the racists they are just by trying to be "anti-racist". Talking about crime statistics? Must be black people doing all the crime- ban it. Talking about apes of any kind? CLEARLY talking about blacks and a racist dogwhistle- ban it!!! Orks > Violent, irrational, angry, terrible parents, no father figure? Basically black people- ban iiiiit~
The only reason to think black people shouldn't be mentioned when they are the perpetrator of a criminal act is if you think ALL black people are criminal, adult-children incapable of reason or civility(who look like monkeys and act like orks). They are the ones holding back the potential of minorities every time they insist they will never succeed in anything they do as long as the White Man (tm) is around to oppress [be superior] to them.
Pick one.
The entire sub falls under a violation of Reddit's harassment rule for being an attack on an identity group.
And the reddit admins know it, too. They banned fragile black redditor and fragile jewish redditor, so its very intentional that they left fragile white redditor.
That's exactly correct, and the "promoting hate against vulnerable groups" is built to explicitly exclude whites, straights, cisgenders, Christians, etc, from being protected by the harassment rule. Which is why I make that copypasta.
You might have missed when reddit clarified that they do not classify white people as an identity...
LMAO WHAT
I don't have a link, it was posted on here a lot, if anyone does it's probably time to repost.
Basically they "clarified" that their rules don't apply to white or straight people because those aren't "identities" or some such bs in much more weaselly language.
That's fucking hilarious.
No, they said that some groups (which they refused to specify) don't count as vulnerable identities.
That's why I do the "Reddit Apartheid" copypasta every time the rule gets invoked:
They specifically cited that some groups are not considered vulnerable, and the promotion of hate against them would not be covered by that rule.
They originally used the term "Majority" instead of vulnerable, but it made absolutely no sense. They were using a euphemism treadmill to cover for the fact that they believe certain demographics are inherently morally degenerate and are undeserving of equal protection
There is no white identity, only white supremacy.
That doesn't make any sense. If there's no identity, how could you claim that it is superior to other identities.
That's like saying there are no cars, only fast cars.
No no, there are no Fast cars, there are only Slow cars.
The disadvantaged Slow cars cannot compete on an equal playing field, and so we must reduce the speed of all cars to be equal. We cannot allow Toxic Fastness to continue to exist.
I don't make the rules, DoM.
Will fragilewhiteredditor accept responsibility for this guy?
https://archive.ph/AjRzJ https:// www. ledger-enquirer. com/news/local/crime/article252097433. html
You lost them at "accent responsibility".
You could always ask if the guy read, or was inspired by, or was acting adjacently to the principles of, r/fragilewhiteredditor.
Yeah but accepting responsibility is something they're allergic to, lmao. That's the point. Truth doesn't matter to them.
"0 tolerance for any kind of bigotry"
bet this is a lie
Was the subreddit name not enough of a hint for you? lol.
Reddit is cancer Don't use reddit
It's fun, how else would I become a superstar on there?
i love how they wail on about white fragility but the moment you call one spic or a nigger, an entire hood starts chimping out.
It's called "projection".
Whoa, hang on there.
First, Fragile White Redditor is not dedicated to Critical Race Theory. It's just an anti-white subreddit.
Second, archive that reddit link. What we've seen is that Reddit scans links to websites that are linked to them, and uses that as a just cause for censoring other subreddits. Which means linking to them directly from here, actually puts the Reddit sub in danger.
This is a containment board.
Too true. Now that just raises the question of how to restart again, and who can anyone actually trust to run it?
The issue is how much of a problem this is going to be for us, not being able to pull users off it.
You're literally going to allow Reddit to censor us on a DIFFERENT SITE? Jesus, dude, there's caution and then there's just going too far.
I get the complaint, but there is a point to realize that they will use your post as a reason to ban our .win from the site. For the moment, it isn't.
Okay, but who's they? TD.win is going to ban our site because we linked to a subreddit?
Reddit is likely going to remove all links to our kia2.win site on Reddit.
Ah. Well, I guess I can use an archive next time, no harm in that.
OH NO, NOT LE REDDIT!
I guess the tranny jannies can leave reddit, but they can't leave reddit behind.
What's that you say? We're going to need to make a "KIA3" to get away from dumbshit mods that still care about reddit? Sounds like a solid idea to me. Even now this whole site is looking more like containment than escape. Tell me why you never brought back the "contacting advertisers" thing, it was clearly effective.
If you keep the same moderators, the platform you're on is irrelevant.
Why does he need to bring it back? He's there to clean the place. Start a campaign, go ahead, do it yourself. We're not on Reddit.
I don't know what you're talking about. I may not have been here for whatever that is.
Just in case you aren't a just pretending to be oblivious, it was about getting advertisers to stop supporting bullshit through emails. It was really effective, so reddit forced the mods to axe it. Of course you faggots are still concerned about reddit, so it seems pretty damn obvious why we haven't had any major threads on that so far.
I mean, feel free to, I don't care.
Just don't do crazy shit like actually harass people and write letters about how their all jews.
Frankly, between the false flags, and the fact that woke companies don't give a shit, I'm not surprised there's no demand for it.
No one's stopping you.
There's 25k users of that sub. That you can't keep your spaghetti in your pockets is no reason to let you screw things up for them.
Feel free to bring it back yourself.