In fairness, that's not a SWAT team. Maybe someone's a SWAT officer, and they have a van; but they're not suited up, and they are not geared up, they're not setting up a perimeter, and it looks like they had zero intention of going inside.
In fairness, that's not a SWAT team. Maybe someone's a SWAT officer, and they have a van; but they're not suited up, and they are not geared up, they're not setting up a perimeter, and it looks like they had zero intention of going inside.
You proclaim to not be a believer; yet consent to believe in false authority within the same sentence. You're living a contradiction...athe-ISM represents a belief system you consented to by free will of choice; which puts you under the false authority of others.
I'm an atheist...straight to hell.
An atheist Christian nonetheless...or are you from the atheistic judeo-Christian branch?
I think the insinuation here is that fwoc thinks you're taking the most literal, naïve view of the nature of god, and that if you were to adopt a more flexible, abstracted definition of god you probably would arrive at not being atheist.
In some regards it's very tragic that christianity entails a literal anthromorphized god.
The issue is one didn’t come to that conclusion oneself, you submitted yourself to the false authority of the atheipriests like degrassi tyson, bill nye, or if you’re slightly less stupid, Dawkins and Hitchens
Few things you’ve inspired me to comment on, so thanks for your insightful reply:
I wasn’t trying to straw man or debate fallaciously, infact when I used the word “you” I had hoped the general and not the specific would be assumed, as the comment chain was already kind of depersonalized in that you were adding a comment to a thread between two others, regardless sorry if you or anyone else interpreted it that way lol
I draw a distinction between someone who employs the “scientific method” (known by many names throughout history, long before “the enlightenment”) and those who prostrate at the idol of Science (trust it btw or else you’ll be branded a herati...I mean Science Denier)
In some senses, A-Theism (“without a philosophy of god”/“a philosophy without god”) does result in anarchy. Now this “philosophy of god” can take uncountable myriad forms. Upon inspection however, many if not all “scientific” philosophies end up at an obfuscated God (the Big Bang is just Creatio Ex Nihlo rebranded under the new regime). This was Nietzsche’s main thesis, and I think there’s a lot of value to be had in understanding the arguments at play here.
how "following authority" and "not believing in god" are contradictory
In short..gaining authority over self (free will) from reality (god); to then giving authority back to reality (god) contradicts the need for having authority; doesn't it?
There's obviously more going on here....
a) one cannot give authority to anyone; because free will isn't transferable. One can only ignore having the sole authority over self (free will).
b) one does not consent to God when believing. One consents (by free will) to another one; acting in the name of God (in nomine), while offering (by his free will) the term "God", which represents a substitute (idol) for the alleged real authority figure over all reality (God). The believer is tricked to consent to a contract of belief with another one; who offers an idol; a word; a brand. That's what the believers believes in; and what the one offering it then gains the power to act in the name of; to define and redefine by his free will of choice.
The trick is to use suggestion (belief) to get one to consent by free will to ignore free will for the suggestion made by the free will of another...to submit ones free will to another ones free will.
c) to believe represents choice of action; and both action and choice (balance) require motion to work, so the foundation for free will of choice represents balance within motion. That's our reality (motion); defining through its function the fundamental laws of nature.
d) to follow also represents choice of action; but when comprehending motion (reality), then free will of choice has a foundation...ones choice within motion represents adherence to self sustenance (need) or the ignorance thereof (want). In otehr words adhering to reality; or ignoring reality for...fiction aka upheld (affixed) assumptions in ignorance of motion (beliefs).
e) Motion represents authority for the ones within; yet the balance within motion allows the ones to have free will of choice aka the sole authority over oneself. Why? Because both choices (adherence or ignorance) represent two opposite functions of motion...recharge and loss.
Motion represents energy; energy represents the source of ALL information (potentiality), and motion applied to energy represents loss of potentiality. Meanwhile loss of potentiality (motion) represents the need for self segregation of ALL potentiality into individual ONE potential within the momentum (balance) of motion. And within that balance; ONEs free will of choice to adhere to self sustenance represents the increase of ONEs potential, which collectively represents the recharge of potentiality through the unity of potential.
In short...energy creates motion; motion creates energy; both together represent the function of ALL energy; potentiality; information; which is...self sustenance.
We are being tricked to ignore reality (ALL) by believing another ONE that we need to ignore ONEs sole authority over self (free will) for believing; having faith in; submitting to; consenting to a false authority over us (personified; unquestionable deities).
The reality we live in does not use words to communicate information to us; it uses motion to communicate inspiration to our senses (perception), which we then need to adapt to to sustain ONEself within ALL.
The reality we live in does not require us to believe anything; it demands adaptation. It does not judge us in any way; shape or form; it instead offers us limited access (potential) to unlimited resources (potentiality) in exchange for sole authority and responsibility over ONEself within ALL.
That responsibility over free will of choice to adhere to need over want represents morality as defined by motion. Reality does not morally restrict any action; it offers unrestricted use of action; which then creates the consequences of those actions as inspiration and temptation for all others.
Living beings have hierarchical deference in their kernel
Needs and wants create the hierarchy of growth/corruption. The leadership principle is being called like that because "ship" represents ONE vessel within ALL motion; which implicates motion defining the rules for those within. The bees don't submit free will to the Queen; they collectively adhere to self sustenance; while protecting the source of it. Then there's the wolf-pack under the alpha who utilize free will of choice to a) put the collective sustenance under the most efficient individual; while b) always choose to keep challenging the alpha to maintain collective sustenance.
We were tricked to mimic both; while the inversion suggested us to believe in submission of free will to not just an unquestionable authority up top; but to a nonstop expanding hierarchy (corruption) of false authority underneath aka the chain of command...a pyramid scheme; a world wide caste system based on using beliefs for suggestion to gain consent to false authority; while ignoring sole authority over self (free will).
The Kernel of all existence is self sustenance, which for the ONEs within ALL represents the need to utilize free will of chocie to adhere to ALL; not to believe; submit; consent to another ONE offering ALL aka acting in the name of ALL (in nomine).
we don't have free will.
What made you respond? Peer pressure? Suggestion? Force? How many choices did you make between perceiving what was written; comprehending it; and acting upon it?
Ask yourself why all religions demand belief; faith; submission; agreement; consent etc. from each ONE within ALL? Because natural law (as defined by motion) demands adaptation by choice of action.
If you want
Want or need...who makes the choices between inception and death for each action?
a problem of metaphysics
METAPHYS'ICS, noun (Gr. after, and physics). That's where we are (after physics); so let's question the origin. Energy represents ALL information (potentiality); motion the loss of it; which causes momentum within motion aka resistance to motion aka friction causing vibration; causing form to temporarily balance within the momentum (magnetic) of motion (electric).
The physics we perceive represent the consequences of actions set into motion; communicated by ALL as inspiration to ONEs senses. That's the origin; while "metaphysics" represents the inversion suggested to us that tricks us to consent to a conflict of reason about body vs mind; when both represent natural opposites in coexistence to each other; which allows the balance of "self" in-between.
What represents the self we can sustain during temporary life? Blood within the ongoing bloodline aka the accumulation of that which was; within that which is; with the free will of choice to set into motion that which will be aka the real past; present; future (time represents the inversion) within the ever changing moment within motion; and the real history (not his-story by ONEs own story written by ONEs choice of actions within ALL).
propositional logic.
PROPOSI'TION, noun s as z. [Latin propositio, from propositus, propono.] - "that which is proposed; that which is offered for consideration, acceptance or adoption; a proposal; offer of terms". This represents ALL offering inspiration to ONEs senses (perception).
LOG'IC, noun [Latin id; Gr. from reason, to speak.]. That represents ONEs choice of ignorance towards ALL (reality) for the offered belief (fiction) of another ONE, which then causes the conflict of reason (believe in truth versus false).
Nature does not offer false; and motion does not offer affixed truth either; because motion represents constant change. The only thing that cannot change are the rules that define how motion operates (the laws of nature), which each ONE needs to mentally comprehend (gaining self discernment) so that he get build his physical assumptions within motion on a foundation of comprehension.
Reality isn't about building something; but about the act of building as a need for the maintenance of self aka constant adaptation to inspiration. This is also why our parasites are known to not be creators; only alleged destroyers; but what they're really doing is exploiting ignorance of motion; while suggestion the created within to those who created it; as to attach them to it (temptation of want); while flushing them down the flow of motion(loss); which corrupts and destroys all creation set into it. They call this energy harvesting.
OCCUR', verb intransitive [Latin occurro; ob and curro, to run.] See, an allegory for motion aka energy aka the source of ALL information. It's not creation of new; it's transmutation out of ALL that already is; and the natural opposites are defined by each others coexistence within the motion of ALL energy.
There's no 0 (off); it's always 1 (on aka ONE aka ALL).
Academic ONEism destroys +0- brain.
Academic means belonging to false authority; which implies ignoring sole authority over ONEself within ALL (free will of choice). It's consent to any offered -ism that corrupts ONE comprehension (potential) of ALL perceived (potentiality).
Until you can tear and burn
Until represents ignorance of that which is for that which might be. Tear and burn represents ignorance of the status quo within motion; which corrupts and destroys all set into it. Motion represents ongoing order; momentum represents temporary chaos. We represent chaos out of order; not the inversion.
escape
Ignorance of ALL for belief in the want of more.
your educated brilliant brain
I grew up anti-authoritarian. My education (indoctrination) was about getting out as quick as possible, while burning as many bridges as possible.
equator
EQUA'TOR, noun [Latin from oequo, to make equal.] The parasite inversion of equality at play...ALL is ONE in energy (that's the real equality) and motion self segregated ALL (potentiality) into individual ONEs (potential); which is why we are all different; which is needed as inspiration to get us to adhere to self sustenance; which would reunite the potential; based on individual adherence to self sustenance...only by ONEs free will of choice to adhere to ALL.
SO'LAR, adjective [Latin solaris, for sol, the sun.]
Heat accumulation through the velocity of motion meeting the resistance of momentum causing friction and vibration. And what need does heat create? Liquid cooling and in comes the self (blood).
antipode
AN'TIPODE, noun [Gr. opposite, and foot.] Allegory for the act of balancing by choice of action.
equal to nothing
Could you direct me to the inequality of nothingness for reference?
Offer meets consent by free will of choice. Each of us then either acts upon need (adaptation to inspiration) or on want (belief in information). The former represents adherence to self sustenance; the latter represents ignorance thereof in favor for a temptation.
Every word I typed was a choice I had to make.
No. "had to" refers to need. We don't need any words to communicate. These brands are restricting our senses to constantly adapt to what motion has to offer.
The words we type are in adherence to a want (temptation); a fictitious layer of explanations (assumptions upheld as beliefs); of a system based on change, that ignore adherence to change.
Do I truly have free will if the set of choices I can make is limited?
What does free imply? Freedom aka free and dominance aka natural opposites in coexistence with each other. One cannot be free without it being defined by barriers. ONE cannot be without being within ALL. One cannot jump up without coming from a down. If you stand still and make a step to the left; then you established the right as well. Now add the ignored motion to this and it becomes a choice based act of balance in-between the natural opposites...life in between inception and death.
It is the limitation of being ONE (potential) within ALL (potentiality) that allows ONE to perceive the differences in potential; which are needed to inspire adherence to self sustenance.
As for limitation of choice...there's only two. Adherence (need) or ignorance (want). Yet look what balance (momentum) can achieve within motion?
Even if that limit is created by the tyranny of my own potential ignorance?
That refers to an added limitations within ONEself aka a lack of potential aka restricted/unused/ignored potential. Within the function of ALL; ignorance simply gets attributed to loss of potentiality through motion; while all the ONEs that adhere to struggle for self sustenance get attributed to the recharge of potentiality within the momentum (balance/resistance) of motion.
ONEs choice of actions and the resulting consequences are limited to the magnetic momentum; while ALL electric motion represents the barrier for the existence of momentum; the natural opposites defined by motion aka the movement from a beginning towards an end; which defines all the ONEs within as being temporary; limited; set into motion.
As for tyranny...the power that ONE represents (potential) is defined by the power that ALL offers (potentiality). It is the velocity of motion that defines the resistance of its momentum; the flow of the electric that defines the sustenance of the magnetic within.
It's similar to you being restricted to typing the words "one" and "all" in capital letters only.
This is me stripping language of complexity to prevent the ignorant to use it to hide behind. I boiled existence down to ONE within ALL and they still want to argue what all means; even if I write ALL My favorites are those who try to argue for there being more than all; because it shows the corruption of wants set into motion...it can never be enough. That inspires me to tackle ignorance within myself way more efficiently.
He banished them like demons. It's a bit sad though that he says they came during the time of worship, but you can see at the beginning that there's no one else inside the church worshiping.
Massive gatherings to promote critical race theory: this is fine
Small gatherings to observe sacred religious traditions: BREACH! BREACH! ON THE GROUND NOW!
That's a strange way to describe a riot.
They will be punished harshly. Possibly used as Progressive Death Cult blood sacrifices. I hope they enjoy their knife fights in prison.
The man is a beast, ran them off his property again. So much respect for this guy.
So they brought a SWAT team and all it took to run them out was an angry Pole? Canada, this is why people pick on you.
In fairness, that's not a SWAT team. Maybe someone's a SWAT officer, and they have a van; but they're not suited up, and they are not geared up, they're not setting up a perimeter, and it looks like they had zero intention of going inside.
In fairness, that's not a SWAT team. Maybe someone's a SWAT officer, and they have a van; but they're not suited up, and they are not geared up, they're not setting up a perimeter, and it looks like they had zero intention of going inside.
Always happy to see a Pole doing their duty and serving God. Sacrifice is in our blood.
Maybe Poland cannot into space, but Poland sure can stick up for itself. Happy to have you along for the ride.
I'm an atheist and I think these police need to be sent straight to hell.
You proclaim to not be a believer; yet consent to believe in false authority within the same sentence. You're living a contradiction...athe-ISM represents a belief system you consented to by free will of choice; which puts you under the false authority of others.
An atheist Christian nonetheless...or are you from the atheistic judeo-Christian branch?
They're not, for your conception of god.
I think the insinuation here is that fwoc thinks you're taking the most literal, naïve view of the nature of god, and that if you were to adopt a more flexible, abstracted definition of god you probably would arrive at not being atheist.
In some regards it's very tragic that christianity entails a literal anthromorphized god.
The issue is one didn’t come to that conclusion oneself, you submitted yourself to the false authority of the atheipriests like degrassi tyson, bill nye, or if you’re slightly less stupid, Dawkins and Hitchens
It’s not that they contradict, it’s that the two issues are orthogonal.
One who defers to authority is just as likely to attend the church of God as attend the church of Science
Few things you’ve inspired me to comment on, so thanks for your insightful reply:
I wasn’t trying to straw man or debate fallaciously, infact when I used the word “you” I had hoped the general and not the specific would be assumed, as the comment chain was already kind of depersonalized in that you were adding a comment to a thread between two others, regardless sorry if you or anyone else interpreted it that way lol
I draw a distinction between someone who employs the “scientific method” (known by many names throughout history, long before “the enlightenment”) and those who prostrate at the idol of Science (trust it btw or else you’ll be branded a herati...I mean Science Denier)
In some senses, A-Theism (“without a philosophy of god”/“a philosophy without god”) does result in anarchy. Now this “philosophy of god” can take uncountable myriad forms. Upon inspection however, many if not all “scientific” philosophies end up at an obfuscated God (the Big Bang is just Creatio Ex Nihlo rebranded under the new regime). This was Nietzsche’s main thesis, and I think there’s a lot of value to be had in understanding the arguments at play here.
Inspiration represents the 'cure' for ignorance.
In short..gaining authority over self (free will) from reality (god); to then giving authority back to reality (god) contradicts the need for having authority; doesn't it?
There's obviously more going on here....
a) one cannot give authority to anyone; because free will isn't transferable. One can only ignore having the sole authority over self (free will).
b) one does not consent to God when believing. One consents (by free will) to another one; acting in the name of God (in nomine), while offering (by his free will) the term "God", which represents a substitute (idol) for the alleged real authority figure over all reality (God). The believer is tricked to consent to a contract of belief with another one; who offers an idol; a word; a brand. That's what the believers believes in; and what the one offering it then gains the power to act in the name of; to define and redefine by his free will of choice.
The trick is to use suggestion (belief) to get one to consent by free will to ignore free will for the suggestion made by the free will of another...to submit ones free will to another ones free will.
c) to believe represents choice of action; and both action and choice (balance) require motion to work, so the foundation for free will of choice represents balance within motion. That's our reality (motion); defining through its function the fundamental laws of nature.
d) to follow also represents choice of action; but when comprehending motion (reality), then free will of choice has a foundation...ones choice within motion represents adherence to self sustenance (need) or the ignorance thereof (want). In otehr words adhering to reality; or ignoring reality for...fiction aka upheld (affixed) assumptions in ignorance of motion (beliefs).
e) Motion represents authority for the ones within; yet the balance within motion allows the ones to have free will of choice aka the sole authority over oneself. Why? Because both choices (adherence or ignorance) represent two opposite functions of motion...recharge and loss.
Motion represents energy; energy represents the source of ALL information (potentiality), and motion applied to energy represents loss of potentiality. Meanwhile loss of potentiality (motion) represents the need for self segregation of ALL potentiality into individual ONE potential within the momentum (balance) of motion. And within that balance; ONEs free will of choice to adhere to self sustenance represents the increase of ONEs potential, which collectively represents the recharge of potentiality through the unity of potential.
In short...energy creates motion; motion creates energy; both together represent the function of ALL energy; potentiality; information; which is...self sustenance.
We are being tricked to ignore reality (ALL) by believing another ONE that we need to ignore ONEs sole authority over self (free will) for believing; having faith in; submitting to; consenting to a false authority over us (personified; unquestionable deities).
The reality we live in does not use words to communicate information to us; it uses motion to communicate inspiration to our senses (perception), which we then need to adapt to to sustain ONEself within ALL.
The reality we live in does not require us to believe anything; it demands adaptation. It does not judge us in any way; shape or form; it instead offers us limited access (potential) to unlimited resources (potentiality) in exchange for sole authority and responsibility over ONEself within ALL.
That responsibility over free will of choice to adhere to need over want represents morality as defined by motion. Reality does not morally restrict any action; it offers unrestricted use of action; which then creates the consequences of those actions as inspiration and temptation for all others.
Lastly; thank you for the inspiration.
Needs and wants create the hierarchy of growth/corruption. The leadership principle is being called like that because "ship" represents ONE vessel within ALL motion; which implicates motion defining the rules for those within. The bees don't submit free will to the Queen; they collectively adhere to self sustenance; while protecting the source of it. Then there's the wolf-pack under the alpha who utilize free will of choice to a) put the collective sustenance under the most efficient individual; while b) always choose to keep challenging the alpha to maintain collective sustenance.
We were tricked to mimic both; while the inversion suggested us to believe in submission of free will to not just an unquestionable authority up top; but to a nonstop expanding hierarchy (corruption) of false authority underneath aka the chain of command...a pyramid scheme; a world wide caste system based on using beliefs for suggestion to gain consent to false authority; while ignoring sole authority over self (free will).
The Kernel of all existence is self sustenance, which for the ONEs within ALL represents the need to utilize free will of chocie to adhere to ALL; not to believe; submit; consent to another ONE offering ALL aka acting in the name of ALL (in nomine).
What made you respond? Peer pressure? Suggestion? Force? How many choices did you make between perceiving what was written; comprehending it; and acting upon it?
Ask yourself why all religions demand belief; faith; submission; agreement; consent etc. from each ONE within ALL? Because natural law (as defined by motion) demands adaptation by choice of action.
Want or need...who makes the choices between inception and death for each action?
METAPHYS'ICS, noun (Gr. after, and physics). That's where we are (after physics); so let's question the origin. Energy represents ALL information (potentiality); motion the loss of it; which causes momentum within motion aka resistance to motion aka friction causing vibration; causing form to temporarily balance within the momentum (magnetic) of motion (electric).
The physics we perceive represent the consequences of actions set into motion; communicated by ALL as inspiration to ONEs senses. That's the origin; while "metaphysics" represents the inversion suggested to us that tricks us to consent to a conflict of reason about body vs mind; when both represent natural opposites in coexistence to each other; which allows the balance of "self" in-between.
What represents the self we can sustain during temporary life? Blood within the ongoing bloodline aka the accumulation of that which was; within that which is; with the free will of choice to set into motion that which will be aka the real past; present; future (time represents the inversion) within the ever changing moment within motion; and the real history (not his-story by ONEs own story written by ONEs choice of actions within ALL).
PROPOSI'TION, noun s as z. [Latin propositio, from propositus, propono.] - "that which is proposed; that which is offered for consideration, acceptance or adoption; a proposal; offer of terms". This represents ALL offering inspiration to ONEs senses (perception).
LOG'IC, noun [Latin id; Gr. from reason, to speak.]. That represents ONEs choice of ignorance towards ALL (reality) for the offered belief (fiction) of another ONE, which then causes the conflict of reason (believe in truth versus false).
Nature does not offer false; and motion does not offer affixed truth either; because motion represents constant change. The only thing that cannot change are the rules that define how motion operates (the laws of nature), which each ONE needs to mentally comprehend (gaining self discernment) so that he get build his physical assumptions within motion on a foundation of comprehension.
Reality isn't about building something; but about the act of building as a need for the maintenance of self aka constant adaptation to inspiration. This is also why our parasites are known to not be creators; only alleged destroyers; but what they're really doing is exploiting ignorance of motion; while suggestion the created within to those who created it; as to attach them to it (temptation of want); while flushing them down the flow of motion(loss); which corrupts and destroys all creation set into it. They call this energy harvesting.
OCCUR', verb intransitive [Latin occurro; ob and curro, to run.] See, an allegory for motion aka energy aka the source of ALL information. It's not creation of new; it's transmutation out of ALL that already is; and the natural opposites are defined by each others coexistence within the motion of ALL energy.
There's no 0 (off); it's always 1 (on aka ONE aka ALL).
Academic means belonging to false authority; which implies ignoring sole authority over ONEself within ALL (free will of choice). It's consent to any offered -ism that corrupts ONE comprehension (potential) of ALL perceived (potentiality).
Until represents ignorance of that which is for that which might be. Tear and burn represents ignorance of the status quo within motion; which corrupts and destroys all set into it. Motion represents ongoing order; momentum represents temporary chaos. We represent chaos out of order; not the inversion.
Ignorance of ALL for belief in the want of more.
I grew up anti-authoritarian. My education (indoctrination) was about getting out as quick as possible, while burning as many bridges as possible.
EQUA'TOR, noun [Latin from oequo, to make equal.] The parasite inversion of equality at play...ALL is ONE in energy (that's the real equality) and motion self segregated ALL (potentiality) into individual ONEs (potential); which is why we are all different; which is needed as inspiration to get us to adhere to self sustenance; which would reunite the potential; based on individual adherence to self sustenance...only by ONEs free will of choice to adhere to ALL.
Heat accumulation through the velocity of motion meeting the resistance of momentum causing friction and vibration. And what need does heat create? Liquid cooling and in comes the self (blood).
AN'TIPODE, noun [Gr. opposite, and foot.] Allegory for the act of balancing by choice of action.
Could you direct me to the inequality of nothingness for reference?
Offer meets consent by free will of choice. Each of us then either acts upon need (adaptation to inspiration) or on want (belief in information). The former represents adherence to self sustenance; the latter represents ignorance thereof in favor for a temptation.
No. "had to" refers to need. We don't need any words to communicate. These brands are restricting our senses to constantly adapt to what motion has to offer. The words we type are in adherence to a want (temptation); a fictitious layer of explanations (assumptions upheld as beliefs); of a system based on change, that ignore adherence to change.
What does free imply? Freedom aka free and dominance aka natural opposites in coexistence with each other. One cannot be free without it being defined by barriers. ONE cannot be without being within ALL. One cannot jump up without coming from a down. If you stand still and make a step to the left; then you established the right as well. Now add the ignored motion to this and it becomes a choice based act of balance in-between the natural opposites...life in between inception and death.
It is the limitation of being ONE (potential) within ALL (potentiality) that allows ONE to perceive the differences in potential; which are needed to inspire adherence to self sustenance.
As for limitation of choice...there's only two. Adherence (need) or ignorance (want). Yet look what balance (momentum) can achieve within motion?
That refers to an added limitations within ONEself aka a lack of potential aka restricted/unused/ignored potential. Within the function of ALL; ignorance simply gets attributed to loss of potentiality through motion; while all the ONEs that adhere to struggle for self sustenance get attributed to the recharge of potentiality within the momentum (balance/resistance) of motion.
ONEs choice of actions and the resulting consequences are limited to the magnetic momentum; while ALL electric motion represents the barrier for the existence of momentum; the natural opposites defined by motion aka the movement from a beginning towards an end; which defines all the ONEs within as being temporary; limited; set into motion.
As for tyranny...the power that ONE represents (potential) is defined by the power that ALL offers (potentiality). It is the velocity of motion that defines the resistance of its momentum; the flow of the electric that defines the sustenance of the magnetic within.
This is me stripping language of complexity to prevent the ignorant to use it to hide behind. I boiled existence down to ONE within ALL and they still want to argue what all means; even if I write ALL My favorites are those who try to argue for there being more than all; because it shows the corruption of wants set into motion...it can never be enough. That inspires me to tackle ignorance within myself way more efficiently.
Video of the incident on his YouTube channel: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f2Xbo-RB70A
He banished them like demons. It's a bit sad though that he says they came during the time of worship, but you can see at the beginning that there's no one else inside the church worshiping.
My feeling was that a church service had just ended?
You're probably right. It looks like he normally does have a congregation.
https://youtu.be/3fezwXLfb1g?t=4135
Looks to me like it's just getting started.
oooh shit, I think I'm gonna GLOWPOST!!!!