Offer meets consent by free will of choice. Each of us then either acts upon need (adaptation to inspiration) or on want (belief in information). The former represents adherence to self sustenance; the latter represents ignorance thereof in favor for a temptation.
Every word I typed was a choice I had to make.
No. "had to" refers to need. We don't need any words to communicate. These brands are restricting our senses to constantly adapt to what motion has to offer.
The words we type are in adherence to a want (temptation); a fictitious layer of explanations (assumptions upheld as beliefs); of a system based on change, that ignore adherence to change.
Do I truly have free will if the set of choices I can make is limited?
What does free imply? Freedom aka free and dominance aka natural opposites in coexistence with each other. One cannot be free without it being defined by barriers. ONE cannot be without being within ALL. One cannot jump up without coming from a down. If you stand still and make a step to the left; then you established the right as well. Now add the ignored motion to this and it becomes a choice based act of balance in-between the natural opposites...life in between inception and death.
It is the limitation of being ONE (potential) within ALL (potentiality) that allows ONE to perceive the differences in potential; which are needed to inspire adherence to self sustenance.
As for limitation of choice...there's only two. Adherence (need) or ignorance (want). Yet look what balance (momentum) can achieve within motion?
Even if that limit is created by the tyranny of my own potential ignorance?
That refers to an added limitations within ONEself aka a lack of potential aka restricted/unused/ignored potential. Within the function of ALL; ignorance simply gets attributed to loss of potentiality through motion; while all the ONEs that adhere to struggle for self sustenance get attributed to the recharge of potentiality within the momentum (balance/resistance) of motion.
ONEs choice of actions and the resulting consequences are limited to the magnetic momentum; while ALL electric motion represents the barrier for the existence of momentum; the natural opposites defined by motion aka the movement from a beginning towards an end; which defines all the ONEs within as being temporary; limited; set into motion.
As for tyranny...the power that ONE represents (potential) is defined by the power that ALL offers (potentiality). It is the velocity of motion that defines the resistance of its momentum; the flow of the electric that defines the sustenance of the magnetic within.
It's similar to you being restricted to typing the words "one" and "all" in capital letters only.
This is me stripping language of complexity to prevent the ignorant to use it to hide behind. I boiled existence down to ONE within ALL and they still want to argue what all means; even if I write ALL My favorites are those who try to argue for there being more than all; because it shows the corruption of wants set into motion...it can never be enough. That inspires me to tackle ignorance within myself way more efficiently.
Offer meets consent by free will of choice. Each of us then either acts upon need (adaptation to inspiration) or on want (belief in information). The former represents adherence to self sustenance; the latter represents ignorance thereof in favor for a temptation.
No. "had to" refers to need. We don't need any words to communicate. These brands are restricting our senses to constantly adapt to what motion has to offer. The words we type are in adherence to a want (temptation); a fictitious layer of explanations (assumptions upheld as beliefs); of a system based on change, that ignore adherence to change.
What does free imply? Freedom aka free and dominance aka natural opposites in coexistence with each other. One cannot be free without it being defined by barriers. ONE cannot be without being within ALL. One cannot jump up without coming from a down. If you stand still and make a step to the left; then you established the right as well. Now add the ignored motion to this and it becomes a choice based act of balance in-between the natural opposites...life in between inception and death.
It is the limitation of being ONE (potential) within ALL (potentiality) that allows ONE to perceive the differences in potential; which are needed to inspire adherence to self sustenance.
As for limitation of choice...there's only two. Adherence (need) or ignorance (want). Yet look what balance (momentum) can achieve within motion?
That refers to an added limitations within ONEself aka a lack of potential aka restricted/unused/ignored potential. Within the function of ALL; ignorance simply gets attributed to loss of potentiality through motion; while all the ONEs that adhere to struggle for self sustenance get attributed to the recharge of potentiality within the momentum (balance/resistance) of motion.
ONEs choice of actions and the resulting consequences are limited to the magnetic momentum; while ALL electric motion represents the barrier for the existence of momentum; the natural opposites defined by motion aka the movement from a beginning towards an end; which defines all the ONEs within as being temporary; limited; set into motion.
As for tyranny...the power that ONE represents (potential) is defined by the power that ALL offers (potentiality). It is the velocity of motion that defines the resistance of its momentum; the flow of the electric that defines the sustenance of the magnetic within.
This is me stripping language of complexity to prevent the ignorant to use it to hide behind. I boiled existence down to ONE within ALL and they still want to argue what all means; even if I write ALL My favorites are those who try to argue for there being more than all; because it shows the corruption of wants set into motion...it can never be enough. That inspires me to tackle ignorance within myself way more efficiently.