You proclaim to not be a believer; yet consent to believe in false authority within the same sentence. You're living a contradiction...athe-ISM represents a belief system you consented to by free will of choice; which puts you under the false authority of others.
I'm an atheist...straight to hell.
An atheist Christian nonetheless...or are you from the atheistic judeo-Christian branch?
I think the insinuation here is that fwoc thinks you're taking the most literal, naïve view of the nature of god, and that if you were to adopt a more flexible, abstracted definition of god you probably would arrive at not being atheist.
In some regards it's very tragic that christianity entails a literal anthromorphized god.
The issue is one didn’t come to that conclusion oneself, you submitted yourself to the false authority of the atheipriests like degrassi tyson, bill nye, or if you’re slightly less stupid, Dawkins and Hitchens
how "following authority" and "not believing in god" are contradictory
In short..gaining authority over self (free will) from reality (god); to then giving authority back to reality (god) contradicts the need for having authority; doesn't it?
There's obviously more going on here....
a) one cannot give authority to anyone; because free will isn't transferable. One can only ignore having the sole authority over self (free will).
b) one does not consent to God when believing. One consents (by free will) to another one; acting in the name of God (in nomine), while offering (by his free will) the term "God", which represents a substitute (idol) for the alleged real authority figure over all reality (God). The believer is tricked to consent to a contract of belief with another one; who offers an idol; a word; a brand. That's what the believers believes in; and what the one offering it then gains the power to act in the name of; to define and redefine by his free will of choice.
The trick is to use suggestion (belief) to get one to consent by free will to ignore free will for the suggestion made by the free will of another...to submit ones free will to another ones free will.
c) to believe represents choice of action; and both action and choice (balance) require motion to work, so the foundation for free will of choice represents balance within motion. That's our reality (motion); defining through its function the fundamental laws of nature.
d) to follow also represents choice of action; but when comprehending motion (reality), then free will of choice has a foundation...ones choice within motion represents adherence to self sustenance (need) or the ignorance thereof (want). In otehr words adhering to reality; or ignoring reality for...fiction aka upheld (affixed) assumptions in ignorance of motion (beliefs).
e) Motion represents authority for the ones within; yet the balance within motion allows the ones to have free will of choice aka the sole authority over oneself. Why? Because both choices (adherence or ignorance) represent two opposite functions of motion...recharge and loss.
Motion represents energy; energy represents the source of ALL information (potentiality), and motion applied to energy represents loss of potentiality. Meanwhile loss of potentiality (motion) represents the need for self segregation of ALL potentiality into individual ONE potential within the momentum (balance) of motion. And within that balance; ONEs free will of choice to adhere to self sustenance represents the increase of ONEs potential, which collectively represents the recharge of potentiality through the unity of potential.
In short...energy creates motion; motion creates energy; both together represent the function of ALL energy; potentiality; information; which is...self sustenance.
We are being tricked to ignore reality (ALL) by believing another ONE that we need to ignore ONEs sole authority over self (free will) for believing; having faith in; submitting to; consenting to a false authority over us (personified; unquestionable deities).
The reality we live in does not use words to communicate information to us; it uses motion to communicate inspiration to our senses (perception), which we then need to adapt to to sustain ONEself within ALL.
The reality we live in does not require us to believe anything; it demands adaptation. It does not judge us in any way; shape or form; it instead offers us limited access (potential) to unlimited resources (potentiality) in exchange for sole authority and responsibility over ONEself within ALL.
That responsibility over free will of choice to adhere to need over want represents morality as defined by motion. Reality does not morally restrict any action; it offers unrestricted use of action; which then creates the consequences of those actions as inspiration and temptation for all others.
Living beings have hierarchical deference in their kernel
Needs and wants create the hierarchy of growth/corruption. The leadership principle is being called like that because "ship" represents ONE vessel within ALL motion; which implicates motion defining the rules for those within. The bees don't submit free will to the Queen; they collectively adhere to self sustenance; while protecting the source of it. Then there's the wolf-pack under the alpha who utilize free will of choice to a) put the collective sustenance under the most efficient individual; while b) always choose to keep challenging the alpha to maintain collective sustenance.
We were tricked to mimic both; while the inversion suggested us to believe in submission of free will to not just an unquestionable authority up top; but to a nonstop expanding hierarchy (corruption) of false authority underneath aka the chain of command...a pyramid scheme; a world wide caste system based on using beliefs for suggestion to gain consent to false authority; while ignoring sole authority over self (free will).
The Kernel of all existence is self sustenance, which for the ONEs within ALL represents the need to utilize free will of chocie to adhere to ALL; not to believe; submit; consent to another ONE offering ALL aka acting in the name of ALL (in nomine).
we don't have free will.
What made you respond? Peer pressure? Suggestion? Force? How many choices did you make between perceiving what was written; comprehending it; and acting upon it?
Ask yourself why all religions demand belief; faith; submission; agreement; consent etc. from each ONE within ALL? Because natural law (as defined by motion) demands adaptation by choice of action.
If you want
Want or need...who makes the choices between inception and death for each action?
a problem of metaphysics
METAPHYS'ICS, noun (Gr. after, and physics). That's where we are (after physics); so let's question the origin. Energy represents ALL information (potentiality); motion the loss of it; which causes momentum within motion aka resistance to motion aka friction causing vibration; causing form to temporarily balance within the momentum (magnetic) of motion (electric).
The physics we perceive represent the consequences of actions set into motion; communicated by ALL as inspiration to ONEs senses. That's the origin; while "metaphysics" represents the inversion suggested to us that tricks us to consent to a conflict of reason about body vs mind; when both represent natural opposites in coexistence to each other; which allows the balance of "self" in-between.
What represents the self we can sustain during temporary life? Blood within the ongoing bloodline aka the accumulation of that which was; within that which is; with the free will of choice to set into motion that which will be aka the real past; present; future (time represents the inversion) within the ever changing moment within motion; and the real history (not his-story by ONEs own story written by ONEs choice of actions within ALL).
propositional logic.
PROPOSI'TION, noun s as z. [Latin propositio, from propositus, propono.] - "that which is proposed; that which is offered for consideration, acceptance or adoption; a proposal; offer of terms". This represents ALL offering inspiration to ONEs senses (perception).
LOG'IC, noun [Latin id; Gr. from reason, to speak.]. That represents ONEs choice of ignorance towards ALL (reality) for the offered belief (fiction) of another ONE, which then causes the conflict of reason (believe in truth versus false).
Nature does not offer false; and motion does not offer affixed truth either; because motion represents constant change. The only thing that cannot change are the rules that define how motion operates (the laws of nature), which each ONE needs to mentally comprehend (gaining self discernment) so that he get build his physical assumptions within motion on a foundation of comprehension.
Reality isn't about building something; but about the act of building as a need for the maintenance of self aka constant adaptation to inspiration. This is also why our parasites are known to not be creators; only alleged destroyers; but what they're really doing is exploiting ignorance of motion; while suggestion the created within to those who created it; as to attach them to it (temptation of want); while flushing them down the flow of motion(loss); which corrupts and destroys all creation set into it. They call this energy harvesting.
You proclaim to not be a believer; yet consent to believe in false authority within the same sentence. You're living a contradiction...athe-ISM represents a belief system you consented to by free will of choice; which puts you under the false authority of others.
An atheist Christian nonetheless...or are you from the atheistic judeo-Christian branch?
They're not, for your conception of god.
I think the insinuation here is that fwoc thinks you're taking the most literal, naïve view of the nature of god, and that if you were to adopt a more flexible, abstracted definition of god you probably would arrive at not being atheist.
In some regards it's very tragic that christianity entails a literal anthromorphized god.
The issue is one didn’t come to that conclusion oneself, you submitted yourself to the false authority of the atheipriests like degrassi tyson, bill nye, or if you’re slightly less stupid, Dawkins and Hitchens
It’s not that they contradict, it’s that the two issues are orthogonal.
One who defers to authority is just as likely to attend the church of God as attend the church of Science
Inspiration represents the 'cure' for ignorance.
In short..gaining authority over self (free will) from reality (god); to then giving authority back to reality (god) contradicts the need for having authority; doesn't it?
There's obviously more going on here....
a) one cannot give authority to anyone; because free will isn't transferable. One can only ignore having the sole authority over self (free will).
b) one does not consent to God when believing. One consents (by free will) to another one; acting in the name of God (in nomine), while offering (by his free will) the term "God", which represents a substitute (idol) for the alleged real authority figure over all reality (God). The believer is tricked to consent to a contract of belief with another one; who offers an idol; a word; a brand. That's what the believers believes in; and what the one offering it then gains the power to act in the name of; to define and redefine by his free will of choice.
The trick is to use suggestion (belief) to get one to consent by free will to ignore free will for the suggestion made by the free will of another...to submit ones free will to another ones free will.
c) to believe represents choice of action; and both action and choice (balance) require motion to work, so the foundation for free will of choice represents balance within motion. That's our reality (motion); defining through its function the fundamental laws of nature.
d) to follow also represents choice of action; but when comprehending motion (reality), then free will of choice has a foundation...ones choice within motion represents adherence to self sustenance (need) or the ignorance thereof (want). In otehr words adhering to reality; or ignoring reality for...fiction aka upheld (affixed) assumptions in ignorance of motion (beliefs).
e) Motion represents authority for the ones within; yet the balance within motion allows the ones to have free will of choice aka the sole authority over oneself. Why? Because both choices (adherence or ignorance) represent two opposite functions of motion...recharge and loss.
Motion represents energy; energy represents the source of ALL information (potentiality), and motion applied to energy represents loss of potentiality. Meanwhile loss of potentiality (motion) represents the need for self segregation of ALL potentiality into individual ONE potential within the momentum (balance) of motion. And within that balance; ONEs free will of choice to adhere to self sustenance represents the increase of ONEs potential, which collectively represents the recharge of potentiality through the unity of potential.
In short...energy creates motion; motion creates energy; both together represent the function of ALL energy; potentiality; information; which is...self sustenance.
We are being tricked to ignore reality (ALL) by believing another ONE that we need to ignore ONEs sole authority over self (free will) for believing; having faith in; submitting to; consenting to a false authority over us (personified; unquestionable deities).
The reality we live in does not use words to communicate information to us; it uses motion to communicate inspiration to our senses (perception), which we then need to adapt to to sustain ONEself within ALL.
The reality we live in does not require us to believe anything; it demands adaptation. It does not judge us in any way; shape or form; it instead offers us limited access (potential) to unlimited resources (potentiality) in exchange for sole authority and responsibility over ONEself within ALL.
That responsibility over free will of choice to adhere to need over want represents morality as defined by motion. Reality does not morally restrict any action; it offers unrestricted use of action; which then creates the consequences of those actions as inspiration and temptation for all others.
Lastly; thank you for the inspiration.
Needs and wants create the hierarchy of growth/corruption. The leadership principle is being called like that because "ship" represents ONE vessel within ALL motion; which implicates motion defining the rules for those within. The bees don't submit free will to the Queen; they collectively adhere to self sustenance; while protecting the source of it. Then there's the wolf-pack under the alpha who utilize free will of choice to a) put the collective sustenance under the most efficient individual; while b) always choose to keep challenging the alpha to maintain collective sustenance.
We were tricked to mimic both; while the inversion suggested us to believe in submission of free will to not just an unquestionable authority up top; but to a nonstop expanding hierarchy (corruption) of false authority underneath aka the chain of command...a pyramid scheme; a world wide caste system based on using beliefs for suggestion to gain consent to false authority; while ignoring sole authority over self (free will).
The Kernel of all existence is self sustenance, which for the ONEs within ALL represents the need to utilize free will of chocie to adhere to ALL; not to believe; submit; consent to another ONE offering ALL aka acting in the name of ALL (in nomine).
What made you respond? Peer pressure? Suggestion? Force? How many choices did you make between perceiving what was written; comprehending it; and acting upon it?
Ask yourself why all religions demand belief; faith; submission; agreement; consent etc. from each ONE within ALL? Because natural law (as defined by motion) demands adaptation by choice of action.
Want or need...who makes the choices between inception and death for each action?
METAPHYS'ICS, noun (Gr. after, and physics). That's where we are (after physics); so let's question the origin. Energy represents ALL information (potentiality); motion the loss of it; which causes momentum within motion aka resistance to motion aka friction causing vibration; causing form to temporarily balance within the momentum (magnetic) of motion (electric).
The physics we perceive represent the consequences of actions set into motion; communicated by ALL as inspiration to ONEs senses. That's the origin; while "metaphysics" represents the inversion suggested to us that tricks us to consent to a conflict of reason about body vs mind; when both represent natural opposites in coexistence to each other; which allows the balance of "self" in-between.
What represents the self we can sustain during temporary life? Blood within the ongoing bloodline aka the accumulation of that which was; within that which is; with the free will of choice to set into motion that which will be aka the real past; present; future (time represents the inversion) within the ever changing moment within motion; and the real history (not his-story by ONEs own story written by ONEs choice of actions within ALL).
PROPOSI'TION, noun s as z. [Latin propositio, from propositus, propono.] - "that which is proposed; that which is offered for consideration, acceptance or adoption; a proposal; offer of terms". This represents ALL offering inspiration to ONEs senses (perception).
LOG'IC, noun [Latin id; Gr. from reason, to speak.]. That represents ONEs choice of ignorance towards ALL (reality) for the offered belief (fiction) of another ONE, which then causes the conflict of reason (believe in truth versus false).
Nature does not offer false; and motion does not offer affixed truth either; because motion represents constant change. The only thing that cannot change are the rules that define how motion operates (the laws of nature), which each ONE needs to mentally comprehend (gaining self discernment) so that he get build his physical assumptions within motion on a foundation of comprehension.
Reality isn't about building something; but about the act of building as a need for the maintenance of self aka constant adaptation to inspiration. This is also why our parasites are known to not be creators; only alleged destroyers; but what they're really doing is exploiting ignorance of motion; while suggestion the created within to those who created it; as to attach them to it (temptation of want); while flushing them down the flow of motion(loss); which corrupts and destroys all creation set into it. They call this energy harvesting.