The US Economy Now Run By Women
(www.zerohedge.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (40)
sorted by:
Oh, so you are different from men?
Then let's start examining these differences, shall we?
For the record, I don't think this makes even a tiny bit of difference - male or female, they're all in the pockets of corrupt oligarchs.
Women are not empathetic. This is one of the great lies. Women are also not decisive! What a joke.
Women should not be leading anything. They should not be in politics. They should have not been given the vote.
What a clown world where women are running economies into the ground.
Women do not comprehend the difference between empathy and sympathy, they are sympathetic when it suits them and far more violent than any man could be given the power to do so. Abortion should have smacked every sane person in the face. Wait they killed how many millions? They did it for what reasons? They want to continue killing how many a year for equality?
As I understand it, that is LITERALLY the definition of empathy. It's impossible to exhibit care to everybody because you'll quickly run out of energy and resources, so it's designed to ONLY work for those within the in-group. If you are empathetic, you are caring and nurturing for those within your tribe. An hyper empathetic Liberal for example only cares and feels alot for other Liberals and so on.
No, you’re mistaking sympathy and empathy. Sympathy is selectively feeling pity for someone, as in they are beneath you I.E. Savior complex. Empathy is the ability to understand how someone is feeling period. Women have never been able to relate to any male emotions.
Funny how empathy always leads to death and suffering.
Not always. Just when it's extended too far.
This is something I reliazed only resently.
They are not more empathetic, contrary to popular belief.
They are more neurotic. Which means they feel negative emotions more intensely.
Show them a picture of somone suffering and they'll easily be able to well up with feelings of (self)pity and pain, but show them a picture of someone experiencing something positively and their reactions are no more empathetic than men - and more often than not they'll find some unrelated negative emotion to hone in on "oh yeah that must be nice, but have you considered /suffering/ pain/ misery/ misery/ misery".
Yet the whole world has bought this cope that because women are constantly miserable they're somehow better. No, they are just more neurotic and risk-averse, and thus forgiving and submissive towards the in-group, and ruthless and passive-agressive towards the out-group.
They have always carried the flames of whatever ideology is dominant - it's what you would expect neurotic people to do; huddle together and embrace the groupthink for added feelings of protection.
The moment they find a woman even remotely more attractive or assertive than them exists in the same field, they will turnover heaven and hell to put that bitch in the ground.
And they say women can't be funny.