How come it hit the front page?
Is there anything I am missing?
Reddit is full woke brainwashed as far as I can tell but this hit the front page and I can see upvoted comments about how Biden carpetbombed Syria and no media outlet or twitter trend cares because it is not Trump.
Also people calling bullshit on stats saying white men are the main demographic of mass shooting.
Every now and then a post "breaks containment" and you get a sampling of the suppressed viewpoint before all the bots and shills can overwhelm the system with the "approved" one.
The last one I remember was the last Bill Nye AMA where all his answers were heavily downvoted despite generally providing standard redditor answers to all of his questions. One of his answers questioned the existence of the Deep State and called it a "conspiracy theory", and he got a lot of push-back on that.
Denial of the deep state is the dumbest blue pill position that can possibly exist.
The military industrial complex and banks have control over the government, and elected officials may change out of office, but their appointments and bureaucrats may stay in power between administations... but those exact same forces would never be able to allow their own former employees to stay and support them regardless of the administration that was elected.
If you are Left-wing and believe that the deep state isn't real, but the military industrial complex is, then you're a useful idiot for the establishment.
If you are Left-wing and believe that the deep state isn't real, but the military industrial complex is, then you're a useful idiot for the establishment.
When I think mass shooting I think Columbine or Virginia Tech. They changed the definition of it to be any crime involving 2-3+ people being shot, which lumps almost all petty violent crime into the mix if it involves a gun. You know we don’t have a shitton of mass shootings because if we did they’d all be in the news because they’d love to be able to use that for narrative purposes. All you get is the occasional one with people lying about it. Technically most Arabs are ‘white’, but by that count so are the Spanish and ‘Latinos’.
Apparently black people are the most prolific mass shooters and need to be stopped by their definitions. I’ve chosen to identify as black, and feel offended by my own comment and demand reparations as well as ammunition. It’s getting harder to find as everyone worries me and my fellow joggers are going to pay them a visit.
There are very few Spanish people in America, but plenty of Spanish speaking. All the Spanish speaking are brown, so eventually you just associate Spanish language with brown. The same way Arab and Muslim are basically synonymous to most people.
For America its like a 95% success rate, so its hard to say its a problem. Its not like Spain is relevant in almost any discussions in the modern era.
There are absolute tons of Spanish people in the Americas (I'm not sure if the "America" you meant USA or the Americas). But they don't illegally immigrate so as americans we see them less. But pretty much every famous hispanic is of spanish descent. Shakira, white. Demi Lavato, white. Selena Gomez, white. AOC, whiiiiiiiiite. Ted Cruz, white. Marc Antony, white, Pitbull, white. It's funny that the spanish were far more brutal than the british but their descendants get a free pass.
They did leave. Boabdil and some other Moors already left in 1493, because they could not bear to live under the infidel. Between 1499 and 1525, several edicts were enacted expelling Muslims who had not been converted. But most of them pretended to convert, while still practicing their religion of peace. And between 1610 and 1614, all Moriscos (converted Moors) were expelled - of whom some were unfortunately sincere Christians.
They changed the definition of it to be any crime involving 2-3+ people being shot, which lumps almost all petty violent crime into the mix if it involves a gun.
Likewise someone an heroing in their car near enough to a school will be counted as a "school shooting" despite only one person involved.
It's the inner city culture that is born from welfare policies that incentivizes single mother homes.
You wanna know what the biggest indicator of someone growing up to be a shitty person, criminal, murderer?
No father.
We gotta quit playing the race game. The left says all white people are privileged and have it easy, we laugh at that. Then folks like you do the same thing about crime. You need to have principles and self awareness.
If a commie doimg something is retarded, doing something similar makes you retarded
You wanna know what the biggest indicator of someone growing up to be a shitty person, criminal, murderer? No father.
You are vastly underestimating the effects IQ have. Something that is highly inherited and we have an unfortunate amount of data about the average IQs in certain races, ethnic groups, and areas.
We can't also play the Left game where we ignore all data and science because we don't like it and it makes us uncomfortable.
You could probably argue that a lot of the no father problem stems from low IQ related issues, like inability to delay gratification, poor long term planning, and need for government assistance to survive.
You could probably argue that a lot of the no father problem stems from low IQ related issues, like inability to delay gratification, poor long term planning, and need for government assistance to survive.
Blacks had more intact families before the 1960s. So I don't think whatever effect IQ does have, necessarily has an impact on that.
It's the inner city culture that is born from welfare policies that incentivizes single mother homes.
It's both. It's a combination of individual behaviors and population statistics.
The difference between 'us' and 'them' is that we still judge individuals as individuals, while the left demands that we "not see race" and judge everybody based on their immutable characteristics.
Denying genetic makeup for intelligence is just as stupid as judging an individual based off of their genetics over their actions. We all know that black people on average have lower iq scores, just as we know that Anglo-Saxon, Slavic and Germanic tribes were once considered to be the dumbest by the Islamic golden age. What this shows, however, is that no race is inherently superior consistently, or that even smaller subsections under race have vastly different results due to better practices over generations.
How come it hit the front page? Is there anything I am missing?
Reddit is full woke brainwashed as far as I can tell but this hit the front page and I can see upvoted comments about how Biden carpetbombed Syria and no media outlet or twitter trend cares because it is not Trump.
Also people calling bullshit on stats saying white men are the main demographic of mass shooting.
Every now and then a post "breaks containment" and you get a sampling of the suppressed viewpoint before all the bots and shills can overwhelm the system with the "approved" one.
The last one I remember was the last Bill Nye AMA where all his answers were heavily downvoted despite generally providing standard redditor answers to all of his questions. One of his answers questioned the existence of the Deep State and called it a "conspiracy theory", and he got a lot of push-back on that.
Denial of the deep state is the dumbest blue pill position that can possibly exist.
The military industrial complex and banks have control over the government, and elected officials may change out of office, but their appointments and bureaucrats may stay in power between administations... but those exact same forces would never be able to allow their own former employees to stay and support them regardless of the administration that was elected.
If you are Left-wing and believe that the deep state isn't real, but the military industrial complex is, then you're a useful idiot for the establishment.
If you are Left-wing
and believe that the deep state isn't real, but the military industrial complex is,then you're a useful idiot for the establishment.When I think mass shooting I think Columbine or Virginia Tech. They changed the definition of it to be any crime involving 2-3+ people being shot, which lumps almost all petty violent crime into the mix if it involves a gun. You know we don’t have a shitton of mass shootings because if we did they’d all be in the news because they’d love to be able to use that for narrative purposes. All you get is the occasional one with people lying about it. Technically most Arabs are ‘white’, but by that count so are the Spanish and ‘Latinos’.
Apparently black people are the most prolific mass shooters and need to be stopped by their definitions. I’ve chosen to identify as black, and feel offended by my own comment and demand reparations as well as ammunition. It’s getting harder to find as everyone worries me and my fellow joggers are going to pay them a visit.
There are very few Spanish people in America, but plenty of Spanish speaking. All the Spanish speaking are brown, so eventually you just associate Spanish language with brown. The same way Arab and Muslim are basically synonymous to most people.
For America its like a 95% success rate, so its hard to say its a problem. Its not like Spain is relevant in almost any discussions in the modern era.
There are absolute tons of Spanish people in the Americas (I'm not sure if the "America" you meant USA or the Americas). But they don't illegally immigrate so as americans we see them less. But pretty much every famous hispanic is of spanish descent. Shakira, white. Demi Lavato, white. Selena Gomez, white. AOC, whiiiiiiiiite. Ted Cruz, white. Marc Antony, white, Pitbull, white. It's funny that the spanish were far more brutal than the british but their descendants get a free pass.
Except for their absolute conquest by radical Leftists, particularly of the Femminist sort.
Spain was invaded in the 700's by Moors/Muslims, it was conquered all the way to the Pyrenees. They never really left...
Same sort of logic for a good portion of the Baltic's.
They did leave. Boabdil and some other Moors already left in 1493, because they could not bear to live under the infidel. Between 1499 and 1525, several edicts were enacted expelling Muslims who had not been converted. But most of them pretended to convert, while still practicing their religion of peace. And between 1610 and 1614, all Moriscos (converted Moors) were expelled - of whom some were unfortunately sincere Christians.
I identify as black too - because I need a new TV and the Chauvin acquittal riots are coming up.
Remember George Floyd!
Why buy a TV, when you can just peacefully protest?
Likewise someone an heroing in their car near enough to a school will be counted as a "school shooting" despite only one person involved.
'European Caucasians' would include the Ashkenazi Jews, but they are most hated by people who are with least cause most proud of being white.
It's not race.
It's the inner city culture that is born from welfare policies that incentivizes single mother homes.
You wanna know what the biggest indicator of someone growing up to be a shitty person, criminal, murderer?
No father.
We gotta quit playing the race game. The left says all white people are privileged and have it easy, we laugh at that. Then folks like you do the same thing about crime. You need to have principles and self awareness.
If a commie doimg something is retarded, doing something similar makes you retarded
You are vastly underestimating the effects IQ have. Something that is highly inherited and we have an unfortunate amount of data about the average IQs in certain races, ethnic groups, and areas.
We can't also play the Left game where we ignore all data and science because we don't like it and it makes us uncomfortable.
You could probably argue that a lot of the no father problem stems from low IQ related issues, like inability to delay gratification, poor long term planning, and need for government assistance to survive.
Blacks had more intact families before the 1960s. So I don't think whatever effect IQ does have, necessarily has an impact on that.
It's both. It's a combination of individual behaviors and population statistics.
The difference between 'us' and 'them' is that we still judge individuals as individuals, while the left demands that we "not see race" and judge everybody based on their immutable characteristics.
Denying genetic makeup for intelligence is just as stupid as judging an individual based off of their genetics over their actions. We all know that black people on average have lower iq scores, just as we know that Anglo-Saxon, Slavic and Germanic tribes were once considered to be the dumbest by the Islamic golden age. What this shows, however, is that no race is inherently superior consistently, or that even smaller subsections under race have vastly different results due to better practices over generations.