Norwegian experts say deadly blood clots were caused by the AstraZeneca covid vaccine
“Our theory that this is a powerful immune response most likely triggered by the vaccine, has been confirmed”, says professor and chief physician Pål Andre Holme. Three Norwegian health workers under the age of 50 have been hospitalized. One is dead.
If that's the case it's important to not give AZN to the young, but the vaccine isn't necessarily a write-off. A vaccine that you can only safely give to the most vulnerable is still worth giving to the most vulnerable.
“Our theory that this is a powerful immune response most likely triggered by the vaccine, has been confirmed”
Well, that post by some dumbfuck on Twitter that read "I just got the shot, bring on the cytokine storm!" as if that was a good result seems even more retarded now.
No bluecheck, actually, just some oncologist (with a tendency to give speeches, based off what little I can see) with 3000 followers. I must've caught it through a retweet.
The European Medicines Agency's (EMA) said that after an investigation the AstraZeneca vaccine was "safe and effective" and not linked to an increased risk of blood clots.
It's almost as though 37 out of 17 million recipients of the AZ vaccine have had blood clots, a lower number than would normally be expected within a comparable population.
Professor Holme does not come out of this with credibility.
My grandmother went through multiple blood clots when in the hospital with the China virus despite not really having an issue with blood clots in the past. Perhaps it's something directly from the virus itself.
It's all stuff that would have come out in controlled testing. I'm just not seeing the reward from me getting one of the vaccines relative to the risk involved. I already had the virus and my experience was it was barely a mild inconvenience. Why would I risk any of this when apparently the reward is nothing more than it dulls the symptoms? I'm leaning very heavily towards finding a vaccine card filled out for me. Perhaps I'll look the same places that hundreds of thousands of ballots are found.
Yeah I was thinking it would for sure just because of the sheer length of typical testing. Vaccine approval timelines are usually measured in number of years, not months. I could be wrong on whether or not it would come out.
I'm not anti-vax, but with this one, the risk-reward proposition just looks really bad. It's not new to Covid for me. I've passed on the flu shot for years because I've not seen any value in it's offering. I have taken plenty of other shots. So far the only reward I can put down for myself with the Covid vaccine is the feeling of being a good obedient citizen of the globalist-socialist regime. Not much of a reward. I mean they can't even tell me I can be normal or burn the fucking mask forever? Everyone should make their own choice and there's others I think the health-based rewards would be valuable to them due to certain vulnerabilities and that's fine for them.
Turns out that "there was a wahmen there" wasn't the best way to invest your money. Of course, the company will collapse from bad publicity and lawsuits if your claims are correct, but you don't have much faith in that either.
Now, if one were to arbitrage companies with a lot of diversity BS vs. those that don't, that would likely be a good way to make money.
mRNA is used by ribisomes to code for proteins. They say only 50% to 75% of the mRNA of a vaccine is the right mRNA. The rest are degraded, impure or mistakes.
Lets assume the correct mRNA does its job.... the impurities, mistakes and etc can be deadly. What if it creates unintended proteins? What if the unintended proteins are deadly or detrimental?
On the one hand they sell the vaccine at cost, so there will not be too many lost sales (but they could get stuck with some unsold inventory I suppose). On the other hand they can not be held liable for side effects. So it realyl shouldn't affect the stonk too much.
I suspect that the Norwegian Prime Minister, who is a wahmen, has a hand in this. Clearly, she had a hand in trying to persuade men not to take money, so more men die. I don't trust them. I believe it's just part of their plan for The Genocide.
Nah man, I'm tired of the conspiracy nonsense myself. If it were the occasional thing I'd just ignore it, but the women = cause of all evil is starting to become the primary message of this board.
Also Antonio : "Women who aren't being actively evil existing disproves that feminists have power."
Which is it? Either there are times when they do the right thing, which doesn't disprove what I said, which is that leftists and women aren't to be trusted...or they never do the right thing and I'm right anyway.
Doing one good thing can be cover for later treachery, just look at Jake Tapper. CNN's "voice of reason" who just happened to drop all the sanity when it was needed to ensure Biden won.
Look at Theresa May's new position of being against further lockdowns, saying that the Johnson government (which is just as bad as hers) makes the data match the decisions rather than vice versa. Are you telling me she is now a good person?
Also Antonio : "Women who aren't being actively evil existing disproves that feminists have power."
"Feminists have too much power" (which is any power greater than 0 is quite different from the claim that they are trying to kill you.
Look at Theresa May's new position of being against further lockdowns, saying that the Johnson government (which is just as bad as hers) makes the data match the decisions rather than vice versa. Are you telling me she is now a good person?
Is there such a thing as a politician who is a 'good person'.
“Our theory that this is a powerful immune response most likely triggered by the vaccine, has been confirmed”, says professor and chief physician Pål Andre Holme. Three Norwegian health workers under the age of 50 have been hospitalized. One is dead.
Actual headline.
All the data on this is skewed, because for some reason, only young people are killed by AZN.
Everyone declaring it safe is because they haven't reached those age groups yet! This is going to be bad...
If that's the case it's important to not give AZN to the young, but the vaccine isn't necessarily a write-off. A vaccine that you can only safely give to the most vulnerable is still worth giving to the most vulnerable.
Give it to blacks and call it reparations.
Baaaaaaa-baaaaaaa
Well, that post by some dumbfuck on Twitter that read "I just got the shot, bring on the cytokine storm!" as if that was a good result seems even more retarded now.
Link?
If I can find it. It was a few weeks ago and I can't recall offhand which bluecheck it was.
EDIT: Here we go: https://archive.is/c9gP1
No bluecheck, actually, just some oncologist (with a tendency to give speeches, based off what little I can see) with 3000 followers. I must've caught it through a retweet.
The Tories robbed and fucked their people while getting a PR win from cuckservatives for it... again.
It's almost as though 37 out of 17 million recipients of the AZ vaccine have had blood clots, a lower number than would normally be expected within a comparable population.
Professor Holme does not come out of this with credibility.
My grandmother went through multiple blood clots when in the hospital with the China virus despite not really having an issue with blood clots in the past. Perhaps it's something directly from the virus itself.
It's all stuff that would have come out in controlled testing. I'm just not seeing the reward from me getting one of the vaccines relative to the risk involved. I already had the virus and my experience was it was barely a mild inconvenience. Why would I risk any of this when apparently the reward is nothing more than it dulls the symptoms? I'm leaning very heavily towards finding a vaccine card filled out for me. Perhaps I'll look the same places that hundreds of thousands of ballots are found.
Yeah I was thinking it would for sure just because of the sheer length of typical testing. Vaccine approval timelines are usually measured in number of years, not months. I could be wrong on whether or not it would come out.
I'm not anti-vax, but with this one, the risk-reward proposition just looks really bad. It's not new to Covid for me. I've passed on the flu shot for years because I've not seen any value in it's offering. I have taken plenty of other shots. So far the only reward I can put down for myself with the Covid vaccine is the feeling of being a good obedient citizen of the globalist-socialist regime. Not much of a reward. I mean they can't even tell me I can be normal or burn the fucking mask forever? Everyone should make their own choice and there's others I think the health-based rewards would be valuable to them due to certain vulnerabilities and that's fine for them.
I closed out my short at a $15 loss yesterday. Didn't expect the EMA to do anything useful and I was right again.
Turns out that "there was a wahmen there" wasn't the best way to invest your money. Of course, the company will collapse from bad publicity and lawsuits if your claims are correct, but you don't have much faith in that either.
Now, if one were to arbitrage companies with a lot of diversity BS vs. those that don't, that would likely be a good way to make money.
I made it back shorting Goolag and Cuckflix on the possibility of bad news for growth stocks yesterday. Closed out $25 up.
I knew it wasn't going to work, but I'd rather lose out than miss out on a chance to literally get rich off the downfall of my enemies.
The media is still spinning that this is safe, same with some "experts". Nearly 100 people have died from vaccines here now and they still defend it
mRNA is used by ribisomes to code for proteins. They say only 50% to 75% of the mRNA of a vaccine is the right mRNA. The rest are degraded, impure or mistakes.
Lets assume the correct mRNA does its job.... the impurities, mistakes and etc can be deadly. What if it creates unintended proteins? What if the unintended proteins are deadly or detrimental?
Yet their stock hasn't crashed yet.
At this point, I think the Bank of England is holding it up.
On the one hand they sell the vaccine at cost, so there will not be too many lost sales (but they could get stuck with some unsold inventory I suppose). On the other hand they can not be held liable for side effects. So it realyl shouldn't affect the stonk too much.
I suspect that the Norwegian Prime Minister, who is a wahmen, has a hand in this. Clearly, she had a hand in trying to persuade men not to take money, so more men die. I don't trust them. I believe it's just part of their plan for The Genocide.
Jesus Christ Tony, Impossibro really has broken your brain huh? You really gotta rant and rave worse than him in every thread he makes?
Nah man, I'm tired of the conspiracy nonsense myself. If it were the occasional thing I'd just ignore it, but the women = cause of all evil is starting to become the primary message of this board.
Just holding up a mirror. Cause he only makes these sorts of arguments when it's to his advantage.
Antonio : "Not all women are bad"
Also Antonio : "Women who aren't being actively evil existing disproves that feminists have power."
Which is it? Either there are times when they do the right thing, which doesn't disprove what I said, which is that leftists and women aren't to be trusted...or they never do the right thing and I'm right anyway.
Doing one good thing can be cover for later treachery, just look at Jake Tapper. CNN's "voice of reason" who just happened to drop all the sanity when it was needed to ensure Biden won.
Look at Theresa May's new position of being against further lockdowns, saying that the Johnson government (which is just as bad as hers) makes the data match the decisions rather than vice versa. Are you telling me she is now a good person?
"Feminists have too much power" (which is any power greater than 0 is quite different from the claim that they are trying to kill you.
Is there such a thing as a politician who is a 'good person'.
What do you think they're going to use that power for then? There's only so many bullshit laws to pass before you run out of ways to oppress people.
President Donald J. Trump. But even then, he made some complete moron moves.
What was I thinking. Kill you, of course. Makes perfect sense.
I mean, on a personal level, I am not sure he was such a swell guy - adultery, Trump University, etc.
But even he was no politician. I think being a politician is incompatible with being a good person. Very few exceptions in history.