On top of that based on their name servers at least I'd presume they are on AWS.
I don't get it, a site worried enough about issues that they have the foresight to create a backup (great), but somehow keep having hosting with places like Amazon. I did better than that with my own cloud crap that's mostly personal use and not likely to be a target at all.
Maybe they had it from long before the woke took control of GoDaddy.
That's entirely possible, but ICANN-accredited registrars like GoDaddy are required to allow you to transfer your domain to another registrar, which they should have done long ago.
In fact, they should still be able to transfer the domain. If GoDaddy won't comply, they can file a complaint with ICANN. Of course, GoDaddy may just be dicks and drag the process out.
That seemed like a fight over who was paying the bandwidth bills. In theory, without net neutrality it could be the ISPs censoring websites by blocking their traffic. ISPs aren't the ones trying to censor right now.
On top of that based on their name servers at least I'd presume they are on AWS.
I don't get it, a site worried enough about issues that they have the foresight to create a backup (great), but somehow keep having hosting with places like Amazon. I did better than that with my own cloud crap that's mostly personal use and not likely to be a target at all.
How old is the site? Maybe they had it from long before the woke took control of GoDaddy.
20+ years. Them and glocktalk started in the 90s.
That's entirely possible, but ICANN-accredited registrars like GoDaddy are required to allow you to transfer your domain to another registrar, which they should have done long ago.
In fact, they should still be able to transfer the domain. If GoDaddy won't comply, they can file a complaint with ICANN. Of course, GoDaddy may just be dicks and drag the process out.
Obama's version of Net Neutrality would absolutely not have stopped a domain registrar from dropping a customer.
That is literally everything they do.
"Election Fairness!" = Massive & unrelenting voter fraud
"Sharing the wealth!" = Violent theft of individual property
"Universal puppy love programs!" = Mandatory puppy rape dungeons
Or the OG misrepresentation: "Liberal" -> proponent of eco-feudalism.
"Liberal" = Communist
misread the first one as erection fairness and got a giggle
That seemed like a fight over who was paying the bandwidth bills. In theory, without net neutrality it could be the ISPs censoring websites by blocking their traffic. ISPs aren't the ones trying to censor right now.
China and North Korea are already there.