Seattle social worker stabbed to death as city pushes to replace police with social workers
(www.lawenforcementtoday.com)
Comments (19)
sorted by:
Too bad none of them were exercising their second amendment rights....
Are there any stand your ground or castle doctrine laws in Seattle? What are the laws in regards to open/concealed carry? I'd be surprised if the same city trying to eliminate police, also allowed their citizens to arm themselves.
A couple years ago a "right wing" wing reporter was attacked by Antifa in Seattle. He managed to get away and they started chasing him. He drew a pistol and continued to retreat.
He was charged and convicted of 12 or so counts of brandishing/ threatening with a deadly weapon (or something along those lines).
Yes that's it. I guess I got the wrong city. I get Seattle and Portland confused alot. Sorry
man, i already refer to politicians as lamppost decoration, but what shall i call judges donig that shit?
Gutter trash.
seems like the problem will sort itself out
wrong, the problem will intentionally perpetuate itself. that is the democrat way.
social worker holds up hand in U shape. Cries and runs away when Darth Vader's tactics do not work in real life
That happened sooner than I expected
If we armed the social workers ... and gave them shooting training...
And lo did thine city double it’s taxation to provide policing for yon new social worker force
Oh gee replacing the police with social workers is off to such a strong start.
Seattle takes the cake for most braindead city leadership. That says a lot considering there are so many fully Democrat controlled shitholes these days.
important to note that this appears to be a mentally ill dude's random attack on an office worker.
NOT "we sent a social worker instead of a policeman and they died".
seattle is still retarded but the more details like this we miss the more retarded we also are.
Given that Seattle hasn't actually replaced it's police force, that it happened during normal social work is already the default assumption. No reason to think that's a "missed detail" just because it wasn't spelled out explicitly in the title.
It does still illustrate that general social workers are not trained, equipped, or selected to be able to defend themselves, and that's not going to change in a reasonable timeframe.
it's that thing everyone said would happen
If only someone had had the foresight to see this coming.