I'm pretty sure that there are far more than 300 hate groups, but they're not right-wing. They include Global "News", CTV, VICE and other fake media sources.
They consider anti-fur groups to be "hate" groups because of redskin supremacists holding onto obsolete bullshit, worse than slavers. At least a slaver has an interest in keeping its beasts alive and healthy. Fur trade is useless obsolete nonsense holocaust-level evil.
I don't have a problem with fur and leather. I do have a problem with approaching it with no eye for grace. There is no need to be inhumane in gathering resources, either animate or inanimate.
I don't have a problem with slavery as long as the Master is kind and provides decent food and lodging, coz after all, you need your slaves healthy and happy anyway.
Domestic leather from cows and pigs is one thing, we eat those. No one ever ate mink and martin, and the beaver was thrust out front because it's edible, sure, but not on the industrial holocaust scale the fur trade actually is, and was.
I assume the twisted logic would be something like "the left/"liberal" side is the the champion of minorities, which includes natives, so anything against natives is against the left, context be damned, and anything against the left is far-right."
Yes, actual pain and suffering go out the door as a concern because of hairy little niggers considered being considered automatically lower than little brown stone-age faggots because of genetic totem-poling.
Well, back about 30 years ago, Toronto Humane (which, at the time, had an extensive urban wildlife rescue section) was running anti-trapping ads; nothing was said about who did what, it basically just showed the cruelty of trapping. So the federal government told them to cut that out or lose their tax-free/charitable status, for being "racist".
I'm pretty sure that blacks, even if pretty , are not on the same level as whites. /s
And retards are on the same level as no one (and this statement is no fucking joke.)
Why does everythign have to be a COMPETITION? Better than, worse than, better thn means you can pick on worse than? That's the goddamn problem. And that is, by definition, supremacism.
Can't humans see that non-humans are just DIFFERENT, and not "less than"? I really fail to see how a head-banging retard - a biological DEFECT - is better than any cognitively normal anything.
Non-humans are not fail!humans.
So they're not good at technology - THEY DON'T NEED TO BE. And neither are the Sentinelese. Humans that aren't people.
Frankly, in my 50 years of Observing, humans aren't smart or special. They're good at technology, that's it. And then only SOME of them, the rest just ride the minority's coat-tails. And they're good at technology only because it was the only way for an ape to spread itself beyond rainforest effectively (and btw, I would gather that the common ancestor of humans, chimps and gorillas used tools, too. And ate meat.) Man is basically a specialist fail!beast who can't survive without his loincloth and fire.
Apparantly there are 300 hate organisations in a country of 35 million and I can't find even one to join.
I guess I'll have to make it 301.
I'll join to, it can then be "transatlantic hate group"
Are we not considered a hate group?
Dammit now I'll have to find one and wear some stupid matching jacket or vest...
We should call ourselves Jews, make our private club around "protecting ourselves from the next holohoax" and just do what we do.
I wonder what tiny minority group is behind this?
I'm pretty sure that there are far more than 300 hate groups, but they're not right-wing. They include Global "News", CTV, VICE and other fake media sources.
They consider anti-fur groups to be "hate" groups because of redskin supremacists holding onto obsolete bullshit, worse than slavers. At least a slaver has an interest in keeping its beasts alive and healthy. Fur trade is useless obsolete nonsense holocaust-level evil.
so the methodology here is:
...and taxpayers are funding this research. and the journalists that are reporting on it.
I don't have a problem with fur and leather. I do have a problem with approaching it with no eye for grace. There is no need to be inhumane in gathering resources, either animate or inanimate.
I don't have a problem with slavery as long as the Master is kind and provides decent food and lodging, coz after all, you need your slaves healthy and happy anyway.
Domestic leather from cows and pigs is one thing, we eat those. No one ever ate mink and martin, and the beaver was thrust out front because it's edible, sure, but not on the industrial holocaust scale the fur trade actually is, and was.
Livestock and wildlife are not the same.
Are you completely mad, or just a troll?
Just a class B douche.
No, that's just what that apologia shit sounds like to my ears.
Since when are anti-fur groups far-right though?
I assume the twisted logic would be something like "the left/"liberal" side is the the champion of minorities, which includes natives, so anything against natives is against the left, context be damned, and anything against the left is far-right."
Yes, actual pain and suffering go out the door as a concern because of hairy little niggers considered being considered automatically lower than little brown stone-age faggots because of genetic totem-poling.
Well, back about 30 years ago, Toronto Humane (which, at the time, had an extensive urban wildlife rescue section) was running anti-trapping ads; nothing was said about who did what, it basically just showed the cruelty of trapping. So the federal government told them to cut that out or lose their tax-free/charitable status, for being "racist".
I'm pretty sure that animals, even if furry, are not on the same level as human beings.
I'm pretty sure that blacks, even if pretty , are not on the same level as whites. /s
And retards are on the same level as no one (and this statement is no fucking joke.)
Why does everythign have to be a COMPETITION? Better than, worse than, better thn means you can pick on worse than? That's the goddamn problem. And that is, by definition, supremacism.
Can't humans see that non-humans are just DIFFERENT, and not "less than"? I really fail to see how a head-banging retard - a biological DEFECT - is better than any cognitively normal anything.
Non-humans are not fail!humans.
So they're not good at technology - THEY DON'T NEED TO BE. And neither are the Sentinelese. Humans that aren't people.
Frankly, in my 50 years of Observing, humans aren't smart or special. They're good at technology, that's it. And then only SOME of them, the rest just ride the minority's coat-tails. And they're good at technology only because it was the only way for an ape to spread itself beyond rainforest effectively (and btw, I would gather that the common ancestor of humans, chimps and gorillas used tools, too. And ate meat.) Man is basically a specialist fail!beast who can't survive without his loincloth and fire.
So, there's 300 maple glowies in the anti-hate-crime group. Gotcha.