I assume the twisted logic would be something like "the left/"liberal" side is the the champion of minorities, which includes natives, so anything against natives is against the left, context be damned, and anything against the left is far-right."
Yes, actual pain and suffering go out the door as a concern because of hairy little niggers considered being considered automatically lower than little brown stone-age faggots because of genetic totem-poling.
Well, back about 30 years ago, Toronto Humane (which, at the time, had an extensive urban wildlife rescue section) was running anti-trapping ads; nothing was said about who did what, it basically just showed the cruelty of trapping. So the federal government told them to cut that out or lose their tax-free/charitable status, for being "racist".
Since when are anti-fur groups far-right though?
I assume the twisted logic would be something like "the left/"liberal" side is the the champion of minorities, which includes natives, so anything against natives is against the left, context be damned, and anything against the left is far-right."
Yes, actual pain and suffering go out the door as a concern because of hairy little niggers considered being considered automatically lower than little brown stone-age faggots because of genetic totem-poling.
Well, back about 30 years ago, Toronto Humane (which, at the time, had an extensive urban wildlife rescue section) was running anti-trapping ads; nothing was said about who did what, it basically just showed the cruelty of trapping. So the federal government told them to cut that out or lose their tax-free/charitable status, for being "racist".