Isn't the next presidential election still 2 years out? Unless he can actually produce consistent results, empty promises are probably going to backfire by then.
In France, smearing secularists as "crypto-nazis" gets you absolutely nowhere.
It's easy and extremely safe political points to take a strong stance for the right to criticize of mock all religions and against religious nuts using terrorism to de-facto enforce blasphemy laws.
You can even name them in France if you make sure to target the anti-secular Muslims by comdemning Islamists.
It's popular even among secularized Muslims and Jews in France. Macron has nothing to lose saying that, and it would damage his support if he weaseled into a passive weak victim-blaming like Trudeau the cuck.
See also : English Canada's journos, elites, and local Regressives totally losing their shit when Québec banned people in position of autority from wearing religious symbols during their work hours for the government. ( Contrary to what the media would have you think, ordinary Anglo-Canadians are about 40% in favor of a similar ban. )
The more you nag and degrade the Québécois for it, the more they support banning religious symbols on the job. Because we know someone calling that "racist" and x-phobic is a manipulator insulting our intelligence.
Multiculturalism is a cancer that will lead to the collapse of most Western Civilizations.
When did Macron grow a spine?
The election is approaching and he wants to be able to beat Marine Le Pen again.
Oh i'm sure thats the reason. Just so strange to see him be anything other than a lapdog to other powers.
Macron is using standard neocon lines, and the EU isn't disowning him. He is still a lapdog, probably Blair's.
Isn't the next presidential election still 2 years out? Unless he can actually produce consistent results, empty promises are probably going to backfire by then.
As if she isn't a fraud... She just has to spout some right wing nonsense and she's the heroine of the right wing
I did not comment on whether or not she is a 'fraud', but you did not provide any evidence that she is.
BREAKING: TheImpossible1 doesn't like woman.
breaking, ad hominem is still not an argument.
In France, smearing secularists as "crypto-nazis" gets you absolutely nowhere.
It's easy and extremely safe political points to take a strong stance for the right to criticize of mock all religions and against religious nuts using terrorism to de-facto enforce blasphemy laws.
You can even name them in France if you make sure to target the anti-secular Muslims by comdemning Islamists.
It's popular even among secularized Muslims and Jews in France. Macron has nothing to lose saying that, and it would damage his support if he weaseled into a passive weak victim-blaming like Trudeau the cuck.
See also : English Canada's journos, elites, and local Regressives totally losing their shit when Québec banned people in position of autority from wearing religious symbols during their work hours for the government. ( Contrary to what the media would have you think, ordinary Anglo-Canadians are about 40% in favor of a similar ban. )
The more you nag and degrade the Québécois for it, the more they support banning religious symbols on the job. Because we know someone calling that "racist" and x-phobic is a manipulator insulting our intelligence.
Multiculturalism is a cancer that will lead to the collapse of most Western Civilizations.
When he realised that the only way he can stay in power if he starts talking like Le Pen.
The thing is, it's just talk. He will do nothing.
I thought he was saying that his solution is French-style laicite uniformity. Am I missing something?