They’re not really worried about incels. They’re worried about volcels.
Just as well, with a top marginal tax rate of 45%.
Why the hell should you need a driving license when you don’t need a horse license or a boat license or a bike license or a scooter license or a ride-on mower license or fireworks license or a gun license? Because a bunch of Luddites in 1900 were scared of cars and envious of their rich owners?
Which side was witch.
So we agreed all along? It was just a definition-debate?
From the outside looking in, you’re right. It is saying that they have a claim over you forever. If a Jew converted to Islam and then subsequently to Christianity, both Jewish and Islamic law would assert a claim over him forever. His conversion to Islam would be regarded as invalid and a death penalty offense in halacha, and his subsequent conversion to Christianity would be regarded as invalid and a capital offense in both halacha and shariah.
You don’t understand. Judaism isn’t like Christianity. Whether you are Jewish isn’t about what you believe. It’s about the rules of a legal system called halacha.
If you’re born to a halachically Jewish mother, you’re Jewish, and nothing can undo it, even if you go to a Reform synagogue or abandon the religion.
If you’re not Jewish, and you convert under Reform, you’re not halachically Jewish because you didn’t convert under halacha.
May I humbly suggest that you read the Wikipedia page on halacha (if not something more substantial)? Then you will have the information you need to discuss this.
One can not be within Jewish law, while explicitly rejecting jewish law for being judaism.
One is not within it in the sense of adhering to it, but one is within it in the sense of being bound by it.
The Law of Return is a different issue. It encompasses people who are not (and were never) halachically Jewish, generally because Jewish descent is matrilineal or because they converted to Reform Judaism, which does not recognize halacha. And yes, Reform is leftist subversion.
A Jew who abandons Judaism is still halachically (in Jewish law) a Jew. Just a bad one.
I’m a right wing Jew, and I certainly don’t control foreign policy. I also object strenuously to US support for Israel.
Wasn’t Disraeli?
Chill, buddy.
When I tell Zionists online that I’m Jewish (which is true - I even wear the black hat and tassels, etc.), they don’t believe me either. People just use things like that as a way of dismissing uncomfortable viewpoints online. And your username sounds Jewish.
You’re mistaken about the six degrees of separation though. It’s also known as the six handshake rule. According to that, everyone is a Jewish.
The government has no practical way to bypass end-to-end, asymmetric encryption (the kind on which Signal, Telegram and even WhatsApp are based) without hacking and controlling the device in advance. This has been a huge problem for law enforcement for about 10 years. Drug trafficking convictions that would once have been easy based on text messages are now all but impossible, because drug dealers only use end-to-end encrypted communications now.
Generally, when convictions are obtained based on these types of messages (usually organized crime cases), it’s because one of the participants handed over his password. The same man who will hand over his password to the feds will identify you to them if he has met you in person.
I will be surprised if the FBI can ever gain access to Thomas Crooks’ encrypted messages.
Modern communications technology and encryption all but obviate this problem.
There was always something off about Tommy Robinson. It just didn’t seem to add up. He lacks charisma. His support seemed synthetic, like an artificial effort to astroturf him into the public view. This does make sense.
On the other hand, this guy thinks Tommy is secretly an imam called Walid Kempson. 🤣
That's an amazing shot.
🤣
It's not my translation. It's that of Michael Howard and Peter Paret.
Then, as a German-speaker, I dispute their translation. It’s incorrect.
99% of them haven’t actually read Betty Friedan, the same way 99% of us haven’t read John Stuart Mill.
She doesn’t dispute it.
160 yards is a very easy shot.
While his source is Wokipedia.
He controls the minds of leftist young men who would otherwise be tempted by our views.