/pol/ level trolling
This doesn't quite rate. This is simple inversion; it lacks the twist of "it's okay to be white" or "Islam is right about women."
You'd be better off with a pic of Malcolm X, and his quote about white liberals being black people's worst enemy, over a pic of Biden and Harris, along with an anti-Biden quote.
The leftist did. And the host was confused and let it happen, and then had to apologize to Newt the next day. (Host Harris Faulkner is black, and is probably still programmed to let anything that smells like a racism accusation against a white to fly.)
Andrew Klavan, Jewish writer, "Why aren't we going to mention George Soros? Because George Soros is an evil-doer who uses his money to do evil, he has been doing evil for a long time, and he believes America is the problem with the world.... and he is a collection of anti-Semitic cliches. He's cosmopolitan, he has no loyalty to any state, he uses his money to operate behind the scenes, he's very wealthy and he uses that money to influence politics."
"The old system" is ESI, employer-sponsored (health) insurance. The old system is what led us directly to the massive failure we are experiencing now.
"These days"??
Welcome to the party, pal!
https://www.city-journal.org/html/america%E2%80%99s-most-successful-communist-12882.html
https://pjmedia.com/eddriscoll/2014/01/28/pete-seegers-totalitarian-trifecta-n258270
An interesting take, but would his response be any different if the wokesters were Asian? If not, then I don't see how his response is anti-white.
Sorry to Poe and Adams, but MM got there first:
Muggeridge’s Law: there is no way that a writer of fiction can compete with real life for its pure absurdity.
Poe's original law said: "Without a winking smiley or other blatant display of humor, it is utterly impossible to parody a Creationist in such a way that someone won't mistake for the genuine article."
The same happened to Muggeridge:
When Malcolm Muggeridge was the editor of the British satirical magazine Punch in the early 1960s, Khrushchev had announced he was going to tour England alongside its prime minister. Muggeridge wrote up a list of the silliest tour stops he could think of, and then put the article to bed, ready for publication. When the actual tour list was drawn up, he had to massively rewrite the article. At least half the tour stops in his satirical piece were actually on Khrushchev and the British PM’s agenda.
If BK or McD's put ads in The Advocate, or in a gay neighborhood, with gay or lesbian couples sitting in their restaurants doing cute PDAs (like playing the Pocky game, only with a french fry), I would not mind one bit.
Imagine a pictorial ad with a man and a woman taking kids to a fast food joint. You have no idea where the kids came from. It's not relevant. For all you know, that's not a family, that's a guy and his female (platonic) roommate, or girlfriend, taking the neighbor kids who raked his yard for $10 out to a restaurant as a thank you for doing such a good job.
That's because SEX IS NOT THE POINT OF THAT AD.
Even the first ad I mentioned is not sexual because you don't know they're gay. It could be two straight guys acting out a dare, or two straight girls. SEX IS NOT THE POINT.
Given that advertising works best when the person seeing the ad can project his own psyche on the ad, this is a good general rule to follow.
The BK ad above is breaking all those rules. Sex is the point. And it is political pandering, pure and simple.
And you're ignoring self-selection and rhetorical exaggeration.
I'm sure the women the guidance counselors are speaking to are the ones who need the most guidance, and I'm sure the counselors have seen a jump in student e-thottery, a jump large enough to make his mother say "nearly every girl."
You need to let go of the rhetorical incidentals and get to what the mother was actually saying: "We've seen a jump in student e-thottery that has us alarmed."
See? Quit applying linear math to a network visibility problem.
US demographics: Female, 15–24, 21,137,826, or 2.11 million 18-year-old females. 450K is 21% of that.
Now consider how many females are on other e-thot sites.
Now consider how many girls joined, held out for 2-3 months, and quit (probably completely creeped out). In other words, that 450K is a rolling total.
Are you still sure about your math here?
From SupremeReader on old KiA2: DomitiusOfMassilia:
I believe the message is, "When in clown world: suck the clown tongue, bigot!"
The Breitbart article: “We thought, what a better way to convey our values than by portraying an all-encompassing kiss between Burger King and McDonald. We wanted to show that in the end, love always wins.”
I'm bisexual, and this is unspeakably nauseating.
https://satwcomic.com/masquerade
Of course, this doesn't mean Scandis are somehow smarter...
https://satwcomic.com/balancing-act