No, it's just a voter persuasion attempt. Musk won't get arrested.
When you're that rich, you only get arrested if you get exposed for Epstein levels of crime that risk the system's stability if the public's cry for justice is ignored.
Is there any reason why a streamer would use a single platform exclusively?
If I streamed, I'd target all available platforms simultaneously. That way, I'd get more exposure and damage mitigation if I got banned somewhere.
I don't get why there are "twitch" streamers instead of everyone being a universal streamer. Is it laziness or what?
Profiling like that goes against any reasonable standard under which a tolerable society can function. There is no individual who can't be unfairly discriminated against under some category they share.
I've had competent and respectable female bosses.
The original's appeal depended on not being able to see much further so that memory played a part in speeding through levels. Multiple replays of levels was also assumed. Aside from a few niches, today's games have mostly evolved away from multiple replays, and 3D cameras let you see towards the horizon.
Sonic's original idea is very hard to adapt to 3D.
I wasn't talking about the 1% of streamers, but all the rest instead. Why are they exclusive?