5
Kaarous 5 points ago +5 / -0

Of course they do. They chose to define themselves by something that is an obvious and self apparent lie. To do this requires you to kill your soul and proverbially set your brain on fire.

13
Kaarous 13 points ago +13 / -0

The shadow cannot create, only mock and distort.

1
Kaarous 1 point ago +1 / -0

I disagree. It is harm inherent and intrinsic to their continued existence.

And I don't believe in silly platitudes from Hollywood.

6
Kaarous 6 points ago +6 / -0

Natural selection does not eliminate moral evil. It persists because it is an ephemeral problem caused by an external, preternatural source. The freaks reproduce by victimizing and infecting others, especially children.

There is a very real moral and societal harm when perverts put on a dress and demand to be called ma'am. Harm to free thought, harm to truth and the right to speak it, and a Soviet style demoralization of everyone who interacts with them.

Letting evil persist is just saying that you can just leave termites alone in your house and that if they don't come into the living room then they're not bothering you.

But it's not about you. It's about the harm they're causing behind the scenes, and there is always harm.

As for personally, it would be hard even with my good command of English to express how much I despise them.

So let me try. If there were two buttons in front of me and I could make two button presses. One button gives me a million dollars and the other button disintegrates every gay man on the planet. I'd push the second button twice just to be sure.

6
Kaarous 6 points ago +6 / -0

The last century serves as the example that there isn't a middle ground. They never wanted to be left alone and they never had any intent of leaving everyone else alone.

In the last decade we have lived through the lie of leaving them alone morph into them slaughtering children en masse and perverts advocating mutilation in preschools. And all it took was the repeal of the century old anti sodomy laws.

Any tolerance has been conclusively proven to be a fatal mistake, even the slightest amount. Active, deliberate formalized intolerance is the sole way to correct it.

8
Kaarous 8 points ago +8 / -0

Not shouldn't promote.

Actively punish, persecute, and discourage.

It is no coincidence that one of the very first things heralding the destruction of a nation is the abomination rearing its head.

12
Kaarous 12 points ago +12 / -0

Switch gays with murderers.

See how silly that argument is? You'll never be done cleaning your house. That doesn't mean you stop. Because the alternative is living in filth. Hygeine is an endless, necessary task. Be it personal, home, societal, or moral.

Actively persecuting them is the only solution.

12
Kaarous 12 points ago +12 / -0

Color me very, very surprised. I've been to that part of Texas before for work in the last five or six years and within an hour of checking in to my hotel there was a mugging visible from my window.

Now just watch as a mudshark acquits him anyway. Maybe that's the angle they're going for here. Trying to defuse the outrage if an all white jury won't convict.

34
Kaarous 34 points ago +34 / -0

"our own unique take" and "our own spin on the story" and every other variation of that sentence are big red flags in and of themselves.

6
Kaarous 6 points ago +6 / -0

You have your chicken and egg mixed up.

Leftism is the godless religion of the chronically inadequate and intrinsically worthless. They believe it precisely because they don't deserve to exist and they know it.

It's society's fault for allowing them to. We've created a dysgenic system that incentivizes and rewards pure mediocrity, where the parasite class rules supreme without any external pressure to actually survive. Of course they behave this way.

3
Kaarous 3 points ago +3 / -0

There was one in Houston last time I was there for work. About three years ago.

15
Kaarous 15 points ago +15 / -0

Oh they can manage it. Hanlon's Razor is total horseshit, used to sucker rubes into complacency.

It is malice. Not incompetence. Because the real maxim isn't blindly assuming that you either have no enemies or that said enemies don't know what they're doing.

"Once is happenstance. Twice is coincidence. Three times is enemy action."

We're way, way past three times.

18
Kaarous 18 points ago +18 / -0

Except said bug eyed black woman, well that's her real face.

8
Kaarous 8 points ago +8 / -0

Sure it is. It's a lie and he knows it, his family knows it, and at least one juror will know it and vote acquittal anyway.

Might take two hung juries but they'll give up eventually. He shouldn't even have been given bail. It has been kid gloves start to finish.

29
Kaarous 29 points ago +29 / -0

Sure it was. Which means that just like every single other lolbertarian principle, it didn't effectively guard against bad faith.

The next society needs to do that.

30
Kaarous 30 points ago +30 / -0

Spoiler, he'll skate. The trial is taking place in a county where they cannot avoid having several niggers on the jury.

But as much of an injustice as that is, it'll further spur the reawakening of race consciousness in Whites.

Frankly this might actually be one of the sparks that makes people admit that the concept of jury trials is fundamentally flawed and inherently lawless.

30
Kaarous 30 points ago +30 / -0

I don't see any shenanigans here. I see justice. Well, actually justice would have been a refusal to indict and giving Chow a medal for public service, but this at least is not open injustice.

23
Kaarous 23 points ago +23 / -0

Is this the nineties? Are we only now figuring out that Paul fucking Krugman is a commie?

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›