Btw guys, $1 per minute to have lame phone sex with Alexa or Siri: https://youtu.be/dOMygk4v2oY
Also a key point to anti-thot is to find a video of the thot on a medium outside of her control so you can se her without filters: https://www.famousbirthdays.com/video/caryn-marjorie-ishan-goel-beautycon-2019_31360.html
She's somewhat cute but nothing to get too excited over. Nothing like her thottery photoshopped pics.
My AI Girlfriend Charges $1/Minute and Only Wants to Talk About Sex
Bro this is just a transparent advertisement. Why are you boosting it?
the whole fucking thing is such a gigantic grift. you realize why feminists love this shit, right? they are literally robbing men of their money with a fucking computer program made by men. it's the ultimate in a woman preying on men for their inability to control their impulses.
The only woman Imp will ever support.
An alien tranny (born female) who hates women & wants them to be ruthlessly repressed & forcibly transed. It's his ideal society.
Illegals aren't voting republican. The illegals are overwhelmingly left wing because they want socialism & gibs.
No, it's the hispanics who got here honestly & worked their way up that are the ones who have had enough of the Democrats' bullshit.
The Democrat goal from the beginning was to eventually try to make "white supremacy" synonymous with "Republicans".
It's an old communist tactic. Communists have always called their enemies "fascists" even their enemies on the Left. The Democrat activist class has realized that saying fascist over & over has lost all meaning, so they want to pivot to using "white supremacist" instead.
The fact that the Republican Party is increasingly including large numbers of nonwhites, in particular Hispanics, is an obstacle to their little mindfuck word game.
And what you see in this video is how the communist scum are trying to cope.
They famously called black republican Larry Elder a white supremacist: https://archive.is/wGclj
I'll be surprised. All the elites are united on Ukraine and having a major presence in Europe.
Many republicans now take the opposite position. You can look at various ones like Rubio, Hawley, & others, who endorse a more "America first" approach, which means cutting off the $33b in security subsidies we give to the rich EU every year to subsidize their welfare states.
I'm thinking of in what way I could best contribute to exposing the media and academics.
Start by finding like-minded people with decent reach & following them & making constructive comments, looking at who they engage with & expanding from there. Stay away from negative comments of any kind, particularly on a new account. You can be critical, but negative engagement is not nearly as effective to build up as positive engagement.
Exactly. No legitimate white supremacist would ever do this. They would all know that it would be a gift to the Democrats.
This is just the Fed version of these "White Supremacists". [those are Democrat campaign volunteers who put on silly outfits and ran over to a Glenn Youngkin bus to pose for photos & claim to be white supremacists. I mean, they even had a black guy, lol]
Hey you guys remember these "White Supremacists"?
Ah, well, as much as I like to call you a GOP partisan, you dissent from the GOP elite on some important points - for the better.
GOP is going to need to be a hybrid populist party in order to win. Trump changed that. The Democrats are now a very elitist party, so their populist flank is very open to attack. DeSantis knows this & has been exploiting that in Florida.
I'm not an 'End the Fed' kind of guy, but I was very shocked when I discovered that the Fed buys stocks. How much of the current economy is just a bubble?
This is what "quantitative easing" has always been. The Fed just prints money then uses that money to buy securities like stocks & bonds.
- "In response to the COVID pandemic, the Federal Reserve used quantitative easing (QE) – that is, large-scale purchases of Treasury securities and agency mortgage-backed securities – both to support market functioning and to ease financial conditions and strengthen the economic recovery. Its securities portfolio grew from less than $4 trillion to $8.5 trillion between March 2020 and March 2022." https://www.brookings.edu/blog/up-front/2022/06/01/what-if-the-federal-reserve-books-losses-because-of-its-quantitative-easing/
This is one of the main drivers of inflation. The other being just raw government spending of additional trillions.
He retweets me quite a bit. I've never been able to talk China policy on Reddit or on here, so on Twitter I suddenly was able to interact with lots of top policy experts. I've been very into studying issues surrounding China & Taiwan for years so I've finally been able to put all that to use.
Since I was coming off of debating with you on Russia, I actually started off somewhat hostile to Bridge early on, because I was confusing some of his positions with yours. But then I started to watch his videos & quickly realized I'd gotten him wrong & became a major supporter. Ironically - I've spent the last 6 weeks mostly fighting to reduce the US military in Europe & to reduce US aid to Ukraine.
I think his position is going to be the mainstream position for the Republicans by next year & I think (and hope) he plays a major role in the next administration.
This tweet is engaging with a Ukraine hawk & debating on the merits of shifting US aid away from Ukraine to Taiwan: https://twitter.com/dekach1n/status/1656004491043569726
When you are new to Twitter you have to start slow & get very little visibility, but it grows & starts to snowball.
I would highly recommend you build up your account on there. You are able to reach a whole different level of person on there, and if you're able to make good points, you'll be able to engage with very consequential people.
Interesting, because the GOP has always attacked the estate tax.
Yes because rich old donors literally paid them to. I don't think the same dynamic exists now because the issues have shifted so much. Republicans have to contend with populism now, and death taxes only affect the rich. R donors have much bigger problems to worry about than death taxes.
That said, I don't expect any legislation on death taxes. One of the problems with death taxes is that unless you're a communist, it doesn't produce revenues immediately. You need to wait. Congress is likely to assfuck our economy & debt to the point where they need to raise taxes in an emergency fashion.
Imagine if Elon owns 70% of Tesla and then drops dead. If the government seizes it and then sells it, wouldn't it cause Tesla to crash and burn?
No because the Fed already has trillions in stock on its books & buys & sells them. The Government would not have to sell any stock immediately. It could slowly sell it off over time.
Since people don't all die at once, the government liquidating assets from death taxes would be a trickle, instead of a tsunami hitting all at once.
In 1989, Denmark became the first country to legally recognize a relationship for same-sex couples, establishing registered partnerships, which gave those in same-sex relationships "most rights of married heterosexuals, but not the right to adopt or obtain joint custody of a child".
They didn't call it "marriage" yet but the fags were still having freak show weddings & other nonsense. I remember reading about it in the 90s from US conservative groups that were using Europe as a cautionary tale.
But yes they didn't fully call it "marriage" until the dam broke in 2001.
California actually BANNED it as late as 2008, and this was the law until the faggot Supreme Court overturned it in 2013.
Hell, faggotry was literally a crime in many parts of the US until 2004. Again, Supreme Court overturned that.
That invalid became ambassador to Japan?
Pathetic, isn't it? They almost sent him to China but decided against it & sent a career diplomat there instead. I wish he'd gone to China. His faggotry would have probably been enough to provoke a war on its own.
Black Girl Magic
He literally hosts gay pride parades. No one can match his faggotry.
It's not so simple. Since they almost always hold their money in stock, you can't just "tax" it without destroying the economy. Billionaires all having to sell off a large portion of stock to pay taxes would destroy the stock market.
Similar things have actually happened in history. There was I believe a Roman tax that was essentially a net worth tax on landowners. So what happened? All the land owners had to sell all at once, crashing the prices & destroying real estate values. A small number of ultra-rich were able to take advantage of the situation to vastly increase their wealth by buying low. There was enormous economic damage, the taxes raised were far less than expected, and the result was greater wealth inequality.
Liberals always think they can just make shit happen through force of will, but they're fucking stupid and they always fuck things up. And even though my story comes from over 2000 years ago, the socialist dumbfucks still try to do it today.
My solution is death & gift taxes. Let the billionaires have their money. Once they die, then the government can feast on the corpse of the estate. I couldn't give less of a shit that Paris Hilton doesn't get to inherit billions, and I don't think taking away dead hand control of money would negatively impact risk taking and innovation at all.
It really depends, Zuckerberg is doing a shit job now, and guess what? That's reflected in the stock price. Capitalism generally works.
I have no doubt that Zuckerberg did a lot of really visionary things & brought a lot of innovation to social media in the early days of facebook's development. He entered into a highly competitive emerging area & emerged victorious because he was able to mastermind the best product.
Of course he's made a number of bad decisions in the last few years that have a lot of people bearish on Facebook's future.
None of those billionaires are sitting on some giant amount of assets like the dragon. They just own shares in a company which is worth a lot of money because of its future earnings value.
Unlike smaug, who hoards wealth & stops that wealth from being put to any productive use, all those billionaires built that wealth themselves by making companies people wanted to buy shares of.
Libtards don't understand capitalism or productivity or actually taking risk. Instead they think visionaries & capitalists serve no purpose, and all the value in the world is created by dumbfuck wagies punching their timecards.
This lib worship of human life in the abstract is retarded. Some humans have negative value. Some property has extraordinary positive value. The idea that the worst human life is still somehow more sacred than the most valuable & irreplaceable property isn't serious. It's childish in its refusal to accept reality.
And it's obvious why the libs talk this way: they think it makes them more virtuous. They don't even believe it, either, since if some white MAGA guy burned down a bunch of black people's houses they'd be calling for his execution. Hell, they do that even without the burning of the houses.