2
XBX_X 2 points ago +2 / -0

It is a well known "what are you going to do about it" scenario. But nobody ever had anything solid to bring a case forward.

It was just an accusation. An insider confirming it in court would implode the whole operation.

1
XBX_X 1 point ago +1 / -0

Personally, I hate crypto. It's a giga scam and nobody will convince me otherwise. It's just dudes in the know "rug pulling" other dudes who think they know. And for what? Dollars. All that circus for "coins" that are bought, valued and sold for Dollars. At the end of day, none of it matters if you can't trade them in for good ol' American Greenbacks!

A bag of subway tokens has more value than your average shitcoint.

1
XBX_X 1 point ago +2 / -1

LOL. Where's the meme? This is a news report, dummy. Who you calling "fool" again?

Wipe your own ass, clean your own room, and do your own research, loser. All it takes is one search of the woman's name to pull up the story.

-4
XBX_X -4 points ago +1 / -5

Wipe your own ass, clean your room and do you're own research, loser. 👍

2
XBX_X 2 points ago +2 / -0

If the 80's were defined by the "Drug Lord," then today we have the "Technomafia," for sure.

-4
XBX_X -4 points ago +1 / -5

Your post is 60 words, 324 characters. You could have just copy/ paste the headline into your browser -- no words typed -- and gotten a hundreds of results. Instead, you wasted 60 words, 324 characters, to bitch about the lack of a hyperlink for your personal convenience.

The event happened. Look up his name. Pick the source that you trust most. It's that simple. But you're right, lazy people -- like yourself -- will waste more energy bitching about the thing than it takes to do the thing. We can agree on that. 🤣

9
XBX_X 9 points ago +9 / -0

Absolutely. For example, have a Psychiatrist clear you for mental capacity beforehand, then record a video deposition with your lawyer present. Have your signed statement of evets/ facts notarized with two witnesses, etc. Then make a Torrent of those files and email to WikiLeaks and others.

I'm sure there's other things I'm missing here. I would love to see the online community develop a "protocol" for doing it properly.

2
XBX_X 2 points ago +10 / -8

Notice: It's not my "job" to steer you to any one news source. If you wish to learn more, look up the victim's name in your search engine of choice and take your pick from the sources reporting on the matter. That's your right of agency to exercise. Thanks.

14
XBX_X 14 points ago +14 / -0

I'd have to say that Hollywood quit making real films in 2007 with "There Will Be Blood" and "No Country for Old Men."

Then came the Obama occupation and all the woke propaganda it brought with it. Nobody every wants to say it out loud. All this bullshit started with the Obama occupation. That's when the levee broke and we got flooded with interracial, anti-White, pro-LGBTQWERTY propaganda.

-2
XBX_X -2 points ago +4 / -6

I'm not asking anyone to trust me, I'm saying "Look it up for yourself."

Quit being a lazy cunt. I'm not your secretary. Look it up yourself. It's that simple, loser.

-4
XBX_X -4 points ago +3 / -7

Maybe in the days of hard print. Now we have search engines, dude.

Type "Ashley McGovern" into a search engine and take your pick. It's not complicated. Quit it with the lazy excuses.

5
XBX_X 5 points ago +6 / -1

There was a recent case where children were removed by CPS for being allowed to walk home from school. I can't see how it would be too "traumatic" to separate this kid from the whore that abandoned him coked-up in the woods. Then again, the same gov't let her walk free, so anything is possible.

-4
XBX_X -4 points ago +3 / -7

It's not my "job" to steer anyone to any particular news source, hence why I posted the picture. If you really want to know more there's plenty of information (like the perps name) for you to use your search engine of choice and read more from your news source of choice.

Take some agency and responsibility for yourself.

1
XBX_X 1 point ago +1 / -0

... knowledge to orchestrate the con.

No fucking way. She doesn't even know how to make her morning coffee. She was approached by people who knew exactly what they were doing and going to do. She isn't named in the complaint because the lawyers know better. At most she'll be deposed for what she does know, but that's it.

3
XBX_X 3 points ago +5 / -2

If this were done with a stock, it would be deemed a "pump-and-dump scheme" and everyone involved would have already been tried, convicted and sent to federal prison in a single afternoon.

But crypto ain't that, which is why it was invented. To have a technically legal means of baiting people into another pump-and-dump scam. There's no case law that applies to crypto, and if they bought it on an exchange, they likely agreed to an arbitration and indemnity clause that waives their right to sue. Like you said, "You bought dick girl's coin? Get fucked, nerd."

5
XBX_X 5 points ago +5 / -0

There is a model where celebrities endorse shitcoins for a set amount of real money (U.S. Dollars). Trump endorsed some shitcoin before the election, was paid for it, but it was only available in Europe. She definitely made money from it, if not from people pumping the value or from an endorsement fee. If it was just an endorsement, they can't pin for anything.

3
XBX_X 3 points ago +8 / -5

Nothing will befall her. The case will be swiftly kicked out of court. For one, pump-and-dump scams are very, very illegal ... with stocks. Which is why crypto coins were invented, so scammers could pull off the same pump-and-dump scams with "not stocks" shitcoins.

THAT is the reason crypto was invented. For pump-and-dump scams. There's no debate about it. That's what they fucking are. A huge scam.

31
XBX_X 31 points ago +31 / -0

But God help you if you don't pay that speeding ticket, or they'll put out a warrant on your ass!

And people wonder why nobody respect the politicians, judges, lawyers or cops.

1
XBX_X 1 point ago +1 / -0

Cite your sources, even just once. Show me one time he was actually critical. One example.

6
XBX_X 6 points ago +6 / -0

payment processor censorship in Japan

Absurd. We need our own bank. A non-woke bank. Credit Unions only need $1m to incorporate. It can be done.

-1
XBX_X -1 points ago +1 / -2

Yeah, well, I don't watch the The Daily Zionist so I wouldn't know.

I'm just offering clarity so people don't assume that films are picked without being submitted.

-7
XBX_X -7 points ago +1 / -8

The Academy only considers films that are properly submitted for consideration. A film has to screen for two weeks in New York and Los Angeles AND be submitted for review to be considered. I doubt The Daily Zionist submitted their doc for consideration.

view more: Next ›