Until you get stabbed in the neck...
The Irish didn't.
You speak Quebequois...
The problem with the Churches is that they've become so used to being the orthodox morality of society that they take it for granted. Now we are in a pluralistic society and they try, in vain, to hop on fads like Pride and general materialism. They've abandoned every belief in favour of cynical seat filling.
The original church operated out of people's homes, or even caves, while being persecuted. That was a Church worth following.
So you don't unite along religious lines, or ethnic lines, how are you going to be useful, again?
Or are you one of the badass Citizen Vigilantes who's going to murder judges and drive BMWs?
This sounded good when I was 14, but it's pretty cringe now.
You aren't going to get anywhere just pulling a new religion out of your ass. Ask the French.
Christianity is a 2000 year tradition that has guided all the greatest White nations throughout history. And you're going to, what, figure out a better way from your armchair?
I'm personally done with women in movies altogether. I used to tolerate the "one token woman on the team that's as good as the men" trope, but at this point, if I see a woman, I assume it's for demoralisation purposes.
Really, they're only tearing down the synthetic, replacement culture they themselves erected.
I think this may actually backfire if people decide to embrace actual folk culture instead.
everyone stand and have a conversation before shooting
So the whole "line up in front of what is obviously a pill box, without the shields we just had, and get shot to death" scene worked for you as an action scene?
So, pandering? Sorry, more pandering.
That seems to be all this movie is; pandering to the people they just spent the last ten years alienating (Boll included). They think they can put a based guy as the protagonist and kill some foreigners and everything is forgiven, and you ate it up.
Talk about low standards. I guess that's what things have come to.
I just watch an episode of the second season of live action Avatar. This is not appreciably better, it just has a Rightoid veneer instead of a Leftoid one.
Where are your outcomes, then?
Do you control the physical media on which your file are stored? If so, still counts.
Yup, that's why I'm building a physical media library. I only watch movies and shows online if they're worth the work of making a copy and backing it up every year.
It was never theft and it's stupid to give money to people who hate you, for any reason.
Just working normies up to it, starting with "don't pay for something you don't get".
Piracy was never theft, don't fall for the propaganda.
When the Hamburgler is already dead...
but if I had
This right here is the problem. How do you know you had to abandon your principle to get the best outcome? Was there, 100%, no principled way of getting justice? Or are you sacrificing ultimate justice for personal expediency?
A lot of people have a hard time understanding that the principled best outcome is rarely personally satisfying and sometimes happens without you ever knowing.
Agreed; the problem with "conservatives" is not that they try to live by their principles, it's that they've completely failed to conserve their own tradition of principles. Don't tell me you have values when you're fine with soddomy "as long as it's legal".
Frankly, they're more focussed on outcomes, anyway. Look at literally every single "Right wing" party in the world, right now. They throw every principle under the bus to try to appeal to more voters, win seats, gain influence, etc: outcomes. I just heard Rupert Lowe, of Restore Britain (their third attempt at a break off conservative party) say that Britain was a multicultural society and that he wouldn't support race-based deportations. That's the only reason he's popular at all and, even though he hasn't won a single seat yet, he's already prepared to throw his own base under the bus for the outcome of more personal success.
The main problem with outcomes is that you have no control over them. You could make the perfect plan, check every contingency, make 50 backups, and an ant could cross your path at just the wrong time to collapse everything. Then you have no outcome and no principles.
There are other problems. What outcome do you really want, precisely? Do you want a race war, where hundreds of thousands of White children are killed and the global majority all unite against Whites? A lot of outcomes sound good in theory but, if you've never actually experienced them, how do you know they aren't a huge mistake? Think of democracy, where the outcome of having every person in a nation intimately involved with it's welfare ignored the principle of survival of the fittest and allowed outsiders to subvert and control everything to the detriment of the nation.
A lot of the time, the best outcome is a surprise to everyone involved because reality is subtle. By focussing on one specific outcome, you are blind to every other opportunity offered to you by your principles. Rather than bang your head trying to stop a runnaway juggernaught, save your children who are in it's path so they can grow up and take advantage of a time where there's an actual opportunity to pick up the pieces.
All you have, as a conscious human being, is your principles. The good news is, nothing can take them from you but yourself. A slave can rebel for selfish reasons and die a loser or he can defy his master on principle and die a marty; that's the only choice we ever get.
Does that mean they're going to be paying taxes? Or are they just freeloading, like always?
What? Were tons of women given degrees because they were Black and are now realising how worthless that piece of paper is?
As a Millenial, I can't relate at all...