At this point I wouldn't trust a Harvard trained doctor regardless of demographic. I'm a straight white guy and there's so much diversity shit in medicine these days that I simply can't be confident that I'm getting the best care from a doctor educated at an elite school. I get along with PAs better anyway. I'm the type who questions what I'm told and doctors are more likely to be egotistical.
Bad link. Try this one:
Yeah, that's fair. I guess I just have a bit of a hair trigger for the anti-porn crowd missing the forest for the trees. They're not wrong, they're just a bit too focused a problem that's downstream from the real issue.
Although I think porn is bad, porn games are already pretty far down the rabbit hole. Considering how much easier it is to just watch porn (which is its own issue), if you're going out of your way to play porn games, the damage is already done.
I'd be inclined to agree if the relations between the sexes were functional. As it stands ugly dudes do less damage to themselves playing porn games than allowing themselves to be put on the business end of a divorce rape.
I'd consider giving benefit of the doubt if there were any evidence that she's not a garbage tier gutter slut, but you know damn well she didn't care if the baby daddy was "willing to cuddle without always trying to immediately fuck."
trying to have a sexless relationship, though the "moist hole" line leads me to think otherwise
The sexless relationship is for Mr. Beta Provider. Her moist hole is for the dude she's banging on the side, most likely the baby daddy.
The step dad part is obviously the biggest problem, but "get intimate without sex" is a pretty big red flag even taking the other dude's kid out of the equation. There's nothing wrong with providing if she's holding up her end of the deal, but there's a difference between providing for a well behaved woman and being a sexless pay pig.
Is this the kind of suicide that just so happens to be convenient for the Clintons?