At this point I wouldn't trust a Harvard trained doctor regardless of demographic. I'm a straight white guy and there's so much diversity shit in medicine these days that I simply can't be confident that I'm getting the best care from a doctor educated at an elite school. I get along with PAs better anyway. I'm the type who questions what I'm told and doctors are more likely to be egotistical.
The ego is their likely downfall. They're too important to fall in their minds. So, when tech doesn't need them or is used to use way less than them, it hurts their ego. Get ready to see them rage against anything that comes out that could replace them.
My Dad was trained to be a surgeon, but the title of his degree created a huge thing. He was a lower level doctor and the bigger degrees didn't like it. Now his job is slowly being replaced by a tech. It scares him to the point that I can't talk tech with him, which is half my job.
The medical field is ideal for a large percentage of the work to be replaced by AI.
I've had a number of ailments over the years that the doctor failed to diagnose and ultimately just went away on their own, sometimes after months or years. Got a strange rash, or a headache, or a weird pain? If it's not something common and widely known they're probably not going to figure it out.
This is where AI and databasing can actually be used for good, instead of the usual government oppression nonsense. Imagine a catalog of millions of symptoms cross referenced to photographs and blood test results and a computer powerful enough to search all of them and make correlations.
There will always be a need for human oversight, but computers can process information like this so much more efficiently and effectively than people.
At this point I wouldn't trust a Harvard trained doctor regardless of demographic. I'm a straight white guy and there's so much diversity shit in medicine these days that I simply can't be confident that I'm getting the best care from a doctor educated at an elite school. I get along with PAs better anyway. I'm the type who questions what I'm told and doctors are more likely to be egotistical.
The ego is their likely downfall. They're too important to fall in their minds. So, when tech doesn't need them or is used to use way less than them, it hurts their ego. Get ready to see them rage against anything that comes out that could replace them.
My Dad was trained to be a surgeon, but the title of his degree created a huge thing. He was a lower level doctor and the bigger degrees didn't like it. Now his job is slowly being replaced by a tech. It scares him to the point that I can't talk tech with him, which is half my job.
The medical field is ideal for a large percentage of the work to be replaced by AI.
I've had a number of ailments over the years that the doctor failed to diagnose and ultimately just went away on their own, sometimes after months or years. Got a strange rash, or a headache, or a weird pain? If it's not something common and widely known they're probably not going to figure it out.
This is where AI and databasing can actually be used for good, instead of the usual government oppression nonsense. Imagine a catalog of millions of symptoms cross referenced to photographs and blood test results and a computer powerful enough to search all of them and make correlations.
There will always be a need for human oversight, but computers can process information like this so much more efficiently and effectively than people.
Exactly this. Talking to Harvard grads will dispel you of the notion that Harvard is a good university.