7
Stylishman 7 points ago +7 / -0

The global elite really dont give a shit about that. Its a domination thing.

I mean, look at the Georgia Guidestones, with their announcing that they want the human population capped at 500 million etc.

They revel in their level of control that they could get away with such things, and it reinforces the idea in them that the vast majority really are just stupid sheep - destined to be controlled and used.

1
Stylishman 1 point ago +1 / -0

Tbf, any woman hearing you refer to women as "better halves" instantly pegs you for a supplicant and internally pukes. Be better than that dude.

1
Stylishman 1 point ago +1 / -0

Women operate socially through a "crab-basket effect". When one reaches the top, the others drag her back down. Female nature.

11
Stylishman 11 points ago +11 / -0

Definitely accurate to say that women evolved an in-group preference for other women, while men did not. There is a lot of data to back this up. Doesn't mean it makes women evil or anything - it was necessary for the species for this to exist.

1
Stylishman 1 point ago +1 / -0

https://www.infowars.com/posts/must-see-french-police-join-anti-forced-vaccine-protest/ Yeah this is the only exception I can think of - and it came after days of fighting

1
Stylishman 1 point ago +1 / -0

While I agree with you on a lot of things, I think describing the globalist cabal as a "matriarchy" is a misnomer. Sure, they push feminism to degrade society and divide us. Sure, pushing women into the workforce does nothing but devalue the price of labour (more money for them). But feminism is merely a means to an end for them. Placing women in power positions is also merely a means to an end (more easily controlled).

Call it what you want I guess, but do you see what I'm getting at? The real players don't give a shit about feminism besides how they can use it to ruin and manipulate. Your thinking is where I was 3 years ago, though, so maybe you'll understand this.

Edit: This isn't to say that feminists in their positions of power wont use that power for "the sisterhood" in bigoted fashion, just that they're not the ones really running things - hence my problem describing the vax givers as "the matriarchy"

4
Stylishman 4 points ago +4 / -0

Pfizer pled guilty and paid $2.3 billion for bribing doctors and supressing adverse trial results in 2009. But I am sure they have learned their lesson...

4
Stylishman 4 points ago +4 / -0

North and South Dakota is a similar story. SD, with no masks etc (and greater population density), had less deaths than ND with all their mandates.

2
Stylishman 2 points ago +2 / -0

A woman has verbatim asked me "do you know about the slave trade?" when the topic of feminisation of society came up. My aunt has also explained to me, verabitm quote, "our plan to emasculate men had unintended consequences, it created weaknesses that we find sickening". These are direct quotes from women in my life, only shared with men when the woman perceives the man as behind being behind the curtain of subterfuge (i.e part of the "secret society" mentioned here: http://www.naturalfreedom.info/viewtopic.php?t=1741

26
Stylishman 26 points ago +27 / -1

I think the main reason to hate them is that the emasculation of men by women in the west is fully intentional. Women know theyre doing it, and why theyre doing it (control and power)

4
Stylishman 4 points ago +4 / -0

Ive seen a bunch of your posts, I reckon youd get a lot of value from this site: https://therationalmale.com/ This guy understands gender dynamics like no-one else.