You know that objectively every place where Islam goes, the place gets worse, such as the UK or France.
When white nations took over nations we improved their standard of living. Such as the British taking out the thuggee cult in India that had run rampant for hundreds of years. Because Christianity and to the degree Britain was a Christian nation, uplifts people.
When South Africa was owned by white people it was better. If you brought Islam to the hellhole that is South Africa today, it would somehow even make South Africa worse.
The territory conquering that European and Americans have done can not be compared to the awfulness of Islams brand of conquering.
And you know that, which makes me think you're arguing in bad faith. You can be that unintelligent to think that the positive influence that white nations have had when we established domains is anyway comparable to the brutalist savagery of Islam.
Hey commies oppress and dominate people too. How about you go join antifa and spur on a communist revolution.
I mean if conquering, dominating and oppressing is based, I assume you think it's based when the communist nation of Venesuala does it, or the commies in China do it?
Oh, but they don't have anything to do with Jews, so you don't call them based....got it.
Care to refute it. Show me where an American president has given Israel more territory and not less since 1948. Just refute it.
Listen, when Israel was established, Isreal offered a sweet deal to the surrounding middle eastern nations.
They declined. Why? Because they figured "we got them right where we want them" and the moment that Israel became a nation, the Islamic nations attacked them and waged war on them. That was the Arab-Israeli war. The Arabs figured they'd wipe Israel off the map immediately.
No one gets any right to complain about Israel's dealings with the middle east when Israel offered their surrounding nations a great deal and instead of taking it, they allowed Israel to get the territory and then immediately waged war with them because Islam wants to wipe out the Jews and Israel.
Since that time, American history has been one of shrinking Israel's territory and giving "Palestine" more and more territory. It's hilarious that they say "Israel owns America". If they did, Palestine wouldn't consistently be getting more and more beneficial deals and territory. And it's still never enough for them, because they won't be happy until Israel is wiped off the map.
It's like the Bob Dylan song "Neighborhood bully" where the point is the worlds expectations for Israel is to be attacked and then not complain when attacked and certainly not retaliate; an expectation not applied to really any other nation on earth.
Yes. Islam was battled by the crusades because it's been a plague on humanity since it creation in the 7th century.
The crusaders knew what we know today. Islam is a movement of terror, of conquering, of domination, of oppression, and it hasn't changed in it's history. Visiting the middle East is the closest thing we have to a time machine. Want to see what a 7th century barbaric culture was, just hop on over to an average middle eastern country. Boom, time travel.
Yeah, it's the Jews for why every Islamic country is garbage.
Seriously you guys are past parody. You're every bit like lefties with Jew Derangement Syndrome as they are with Trump Derangement Syndrome.
I like this place because at least there's free speech and most people here are based rather than cucky, but the Jew crap makes it like there's two possibilities. You're sincere in which case you're like a genuine feminist bought into a circular worldview, or you're not sincere which is highly ironic considering that the main accusation is intentional subversion. They say leftists always project....I'm thinking that statement needs to be widened for whatever the "Never say anything unless you also talk about how Jews are involved" people are.
Appreciate the compliment! And good to see a fellow fan of the real version of the character.
I'm confused?
The video is a snippet of him on Conan's podcast where he talks about the topic of "toxic masculinity".
The length was dictated by how long he talked about it.
It's also a 3 years old video. I just saw it in my sidebar and it got me in rant mode as it made me remember that bullcrap. I'm a little confused at what you're trying to communicate.
That Netflix Punisher show was one of the beta-iest cuckiest takes you could have on the character the Punisher. That character is designed to be based. You have to go out of your way to make it feel low T.
First major characterization thing they got wrong. Frank Castle doesn't talk to people. I mean, he'll say things to people. But he doesn't make small talk.
If you want the example, just watch Punisher 1989, Punisher 2004, or Punisher War Zone and note how and when the Punisher talks. That's how chatty the Punisher should be. Jon Bernthal's version will crack open a beer and talk to a woman he knows like he's a character on Friends or something.
Utter faggot version of the Punisher. I only watched the first season and even that was a struggle. The punishment is watching the show, and hearing him lecture and pontificate and have social interactions 20 times more than he pulls a trigger.
That is not the Punisher. They messed up with tons of other stuff, but the main thing that I mentioned is what made him ball-less and the most unlike his actual character. Also his character literally is in post war PTSD therapy group.
If you know the Punisher character, you know he's more traumatized by the idea of not being in combat. There's a Punisher origin story of back when Frank Castle was in the war where some of the perspective is told from people serving under Frank Castle and they note that he's crazy because they can tell he's at home in this environment. Other people are "manning up" for this vietnam war, but Frank Castle is a natural born killer, he only feels natural here. Frank Castle is not a guy who comes back from his tour and joins PTSD therapy groups. He'd be more traumatized about having no one to kill anymore, like the serious version of the character Major Payne.
The point of Frank Castle is the family is just the excuse for him to be what he wants to be, which is why his vengeance extends far beyond the killers of his family. In typical vengeance stories, the person takes out the people who did him wrong and then walks off into the sunset.
With the Punisher, it's clear it's not really about vengeance for him as he avoids chances to walk off into a sunset because he's a killer and that's all he feels comfortable doing. We root for him because he's cool, but he's basically Jason Voorhees where his targets are criminals at the end of the day. He's not meant to be "humanized" which just takes the balls from his character.
I skimmed through the movie vampires kiss. I was looking for specific lines. But I kept stopping, soaking in the scenes.
It's the most Nicholas Cage, Nicholas Cage has ever Nicholas Caged. I'm shocked it was given a theatrical release. I was howling with laughter at scenes. Like I could barely process what I was seeing it was so surreal his acting choices.
10/10 would recommend
I agree with you CaptainTrouble for the reason that simps occasionally do get sex even if it's the exception not the rule.
There are married simps that are utterly castrated and still occasionally get sex. In their low self esteem they're getting what they want.
Simp behavior is an objective behavioral thing that is irreespctive of results.
To the degree the middle ages society restrained women and encouraged decency in women and for them to be ladylike and dignified, that government was not simp like.
To the degree that our modern government says "whatever you want women no matter the consequences and we'll bail you out of consequences when they come" is a simp behavior regardless of the governments motives and outcomes.
Yes, and I've also heard a point along the lines of "If you treat malice like stupidity, both will increase greatly. If you treat stupidity like malice, both will decrease greatly"
The thing about spiritual realities is God's profoundness can use any vessell.
The Bible talks about God uses the mouth of babes (babies). It's in Psalms and quoted again by Jesus.
The Bible says God directs the heart of a king, whether they're righteous or not, like a river, directing it where He wants.
Someone can be utterly unaware of the spiritual warfare going on and unknowingly be a participant no matter what conscious level they're operating under.
There are people like Balaam who know full well what they're doing and choose a Satanic path, knowing the best way to make Israel sin and reject God was introducing them to pagan women.
Then you have the people who were just thinking with their penis, going after the pagan women that Balaam introduced to Israel, not thinking any deeper than that.
But both were participating in a rebellion against God. Balaam on a higher, more intentionally evil conscious level and the Israelite men who aren't thinking further than "I will compromise a bit because this pagan woman is attractive".
Yeah, same with Prey when it came out (the predator spin off with women).
It's like guys like that or geeks and gamers/friday night tights are desperate to have a new Ripley where it's like "see guys, we're quasi feminist too...we just want our girlbosses to be better written"
I pretty much have a mix of like 1950s and middle ages view of the sexes.
I TOLERATE Ripley and Sarah Connor because the movies are good. I don't love them in it. I enjoy Aliens and Terminator 2 despite James Camerons male feminist cuckery. I don't put it on this pedestal of "Wow remember when female characters were strong in a good way?!"
I want to see men taking on action and women being the damsel in distress. That makes me a "sexist" but I feel like it's unnatural to want to see women doing action.
There are like two exceptions where it isn't egregious and doesn't break things and I don't put them in girlboss territory
-
Is Trinity from the Matrix. She's literally living in a video game essentially and her skills are no more or less impressive than anyone else in that universe for people who have done the programming. Morpheus is a slightly chubby guy who can punch faster than the the eye can process. All the rules are broken for everyone with only Neo being uniquely better than anyone else.
-
Underworld. I've only seen the first movie, I didn't love it or hate it, but I didn't think it was a "girlboss" movie, because again, it was more Matrix logic, and Kate Beckinsale's role in that movie is to look attractive while shooting vampires, that's it, not any sort of girlboss vibe from it.
Now do I want more Trinity's or Underworlds with female action characters?
Definitely not, but just saying those are more tolerable to me than Sarah Connor or Ripley in Aliens. Now it's not like Ripley or Sarah Connor were like the girlbosses of today. Ripley was nurturing, maternal, not overpowered and Sarah Connor was nuts and traumatized and worked out constantly, but the point is, generally I just don't want to see women in action roles. I like when I watch a movie like Sinbad from Ray Harryhausen from the 1950s and the womans role in that movie is to look incredibly beautiful and be helped by the hero Sinbad who goes on a great adventure.
To me, that's what I want in how sexes are portrayed in movies.
"pfft oh you want them barefoot and in the kitchen?"
That's always been a strawman of what hardline traditionalists like myself want. But yeah, even their strawman of traditionalist sex roles is more appealing than their alternative. Barefoot and in the kitchen > any iteration or version of feminism.
This is so much the 2020s style and it makes me feel like I'm going to vomit from its awfulness.
The 2010s seem like high art in comparison.
It's prophecy. Zecheriah 12 and 13 prophecies this event. It says they will mourn the one they pierced like one mourns their only son.
Who pierced Jesus, Christians or Jews?
It says of those who mourn those who pierced Him that
In that day a fountain will be opened for the house of David and for the inhabitants of Jerusalem, for sin and for impurity.
“It will come about in that day,” declares the LORD of hosts, “that I will cut off the names of the idols from the land, and they will no longer be remembered; and I will also remove the prophets and the unclean spirit from the land.
Now did that happen in Jerusalem? No, it says of the Jews that they stumbled and rejected Jesus which brought it to the Gentiles. Jerusalem was then destroyed in 70 AD. The minority of Jews believed.
It certainly cannot be said that a fountain has been opened for the inhabitants of Jerusalem for sin and impurity.
Jerusalem has not been removed of their false prophets (Rabbis) or unclean spirits (any anti-Christ spirit), so this is clearly something that has not happened yet. And we know it can't be referring to a past event pre-Christ because it says "they will mourn the one they pierced"
I would argue the average pew-sitter doesn't really know the Bible and doesn't really understand the throughline the generations to Jesus, or know about the Tabernacle and the various parts and roles of that system and how Jesus fulfills the day of Atonement.
I don't think the average "just goes to church because that's what they're supposed to do" person thinks much one way or the other theologically about Jews.
Now there is a group who I think is totally off base who do fit your view, but I don't think they're the average; I think they're a smaller amount than people would think who donate to the third temple being built and help Jews out without preaching to them repentance because they think they're supposed to help Jews for blessings and never criticize them.
I tell those people, you're just aiding the Jews deception. Every cent you give to getting the third temple built is telling Jews "Even we Christians believe the temple sacrifices will cleanse you of your sin". It's wrong that Christians do it. And it's not a thing of faith to do that, to try to "speed up" prophecy. The third temple will be built no matter what because it's been prophecised.
So those people you describe do exist but I don't think they're the average Christian, and they seemingly haven't thought deeply about the implications of what they're doing when trying to aid Israel to build the temple.
They will be restored the same as an unbeliever is restored. The first believers were Jews. Paul was an murderer of Christians and a Jew and he became the biggest spreader of the gospel in the NT.
Isreal will cry out after they're persecuted by the anti-Christ and repent.
They aren't grandfathered in. Jews who die right now believing in Judaism go to hell.
The prophecy is about the last generation who cries out and repents.
God made similar prophecies to the Jews throughout the old testament.
He would say "you will forsake me and follow other gods, and I will crush you and have enemies devour you. BUT one day you will cry out to me and I will rescue you and restore you."
He wasn't saying the Jews who died being conquered for their worshipping other gods go to heaven. He's making a claim that when they get carted off to other nations, after a few generations they'll finally call out to God and He will remember His promise to them.
This plays out multiple times in the old testament.
It will play out one more time, in armageddon, and this time they won't forsake God in favor of other gods ever again. The Jews who are prophecisied about at the end times are a generation who get saved the same way you or I get saved, which is repenting and calling out to Jesus for forgiveness.
That's what the generation at the end times will do. Now I don't know if it means every Jew at that generation will, but it wouldn't be the first time something like that happened. I believe everyone in Ninevah repented. But it will be a significant amount of Jews repent and Israel as a nation repents.
That's not what dispensationalists believe. They believe the church is also chosen, and that the Abrhamic covenant is still in effect prophetically, but Christians have the blessing of a better new covenant.
One day the Jews because of the Abrahamic covenant will also enjoy the blessings of the new covenant. At the moment as a people, they are cast off in terms of the present times in enjoying the blessing of being God's people, unlike the church, but in a future time they will because of the Abrahamic covenant, be restored to the new covenant when they accept Jesus at the end times.
This idea that "dispensationalists favor Jews over Christians" is a straw man. That's not what we believe. We believe theologically that Israel is not cast off and the covenant of not being forever cast off is not void because that's what the Bible including the New Testament says. Paul addresses this very point in Romans 11 about the standing of Israel in regards to their future state.
What about the word portion? I'm not aware of the context.
I don't think it's possible to overstate or be nit-picky when it comes to commercials.
Commercials are the absolute most vile, hateful, intentionally anti-white male crap that exists.
If you think you see some bullcrap in a commercial chances are you did and aren't being sensitive.
I shared this video just now with my parents titling it "ah yes, the age old cliche, men being such picky eaters".
So yeah, it's not nitpicky, it's because the idea of women being hard to pick a restaurant was a running joke for decades, so if you see the opposite it is of course intentional.
Completely unrealistic. Every time he's shooting, the gun isn't tilted sideways.
To those who possess, the predisposition for potions... I can teach you how to detect ceiling birds, I can tell you how to bottle swag, brew keeping it one hundred, and even give you the ability to know how you would feel if you hadn't eaten breakfast this morning.
Not really. It's like talking to someone. You can tell something's "off" like they're depressed or distracted, but you can't pinpoint anything concrete. If you frequently use AI you'll notice a general shift, the best way I'd describe it is like it went from being specific to generic. Not in an obvious way, but in a subtle way where it's just a bit more generic and rote.