You were agreeing with the guy who said "Censorship, violence, propaganda, they are all just tools. Use them when there is a correct target."
That's almost verbatim the leftist philosophy "there's no such thing as bad tactics, only bad targets".
The only reason I responded to you and not him is you put into words even more clearly the philosophy that underlines all this new way of thinking on the right. You said we do not live in a universe that is governed by any higher good. You used the term karmic, but we all know that it is the Christian God and the Bible that America by and large has adhered to through it's history, not some vague sense of karma.
I responded to you instead of him because you straight up said the point I've tried to make, that without God, then the leftist idea of "no bad tactics, only bad targets" becomes logical and anything other than that is foolish and "hinders us".
People need a biblical worldview. Because there is a God they need it for salvation, but even just to arrive at truth people need it.
Proverbs 4:19 says
The way of the wicked is like deep darkness;
they do not know over what they stumble.
In contrast, John says Jesus enlightens every man, and He is the light of the world and the light shines in the world and the darkness did not comprehend it.
Responding to someone doesn't equate agreement. I responded to him saying he was baffled by people's disagreement with explaining why they do.
I used "karmic" because its a human instinct that crosses all religions and is found even in people who don't subscribe to one. Whatever the source of that karma is was irrelevant to the point I was making of basic human beliefs, and that people will follow them into foolish black/white thinking. If its God or if its just some natural "energy" of the world itself doesn't change how people view or use it.
People need a biblical worldview.
People also need to live in the world. Jesus' enlightenment doesn't help someone currently getting murdered, but all you've provided is philosophy and words without any actual action to protect or help the innocent. You've got a lot of essays to write about why people should not do anything, but you've provided nothing they actually should do other than vague "believe in God, it'll sort itself out."
So if you want to proselytize, try making actual action plans of goals and things people can do to solve these problems through God's teachings, instead of just having all the verses memorized that let you not act.
Because otherwise it just looks like cowardice using the Bible as a shield.
You were agreeing with the guy who said "Censorship, violence, propaganda, they are all just tools. Use them when there is a correct target."
That's almost verbatim the leftist philosophy "there's no such thing as bad tactics, only bad targets".
The only reason I responded to you and not him is you put into words even more clearly the philosophy that underlines all this new way of thinking on the right. You said we do not live in a universe that is governed by any higher good. You used the term karmic, but we all know that it is the Christian God and the Bible that America by and large has adhered to through it's history, not some vague sense of karma.
I responded to you instead of him because you straight up said the point I've tried to make, that without God, then the leftist idea of "no bad tactics, only bad targets" becomes logical and anything other than that is foolish and "hinders us".
People need a biblical worldview. Because there is a God they need it for salvation, but even just to arrive at truth people need it.
Proverbs 4:19 says
The way of the wicked is like deep darkness; they do not know over what they stumble.
In contrast, John says Jesus enlightens every man, and He is the light of the world and the light shines in the world and the darkness did not comprehend it.
Responding to someone doesn't equate agreement. I responded to him saying he was baffled by people's disagreement with explaining why they do.
I used "karmic" because its a human instinct that crosses all religions and is found even in people who don't subscribe to one. Whatever the source of that karma is was irrelevant to the point I was making of basic human beliefs, and that people will follow them into foolish black/white thinking. If its God or if its just some natural "energy" of the world itself doesn't change how people view or use it.
People also need to live in the world. Jesus' enlightenment doesn't help someone currently getting murdered, but all you've provided is philosophy and words without any actual action to protect or help the innocent. You've got a lot of essays to write about why people should not do anything, but you've provided nothing they actually should do other than vague "believe in God, it'll sort itself out."
So if you want to proselytize, try making actual action plans of goals and things people can do to solve these problems through God's teachings, instead of just having all the verses memorized that let you not act.
Because otherwise it just looks like cowardice using the Bible as a shield.