I doubt Ukranian women have a particularly high murder rate for the simple reason that, like women everywhere else in the world, when they want to murder someone they get the nearest man to do it.
Nah, the issue isn't men simping for hardcore feminists who tend to be rather unattractive, but rather men thinking with their dicks and simping for attractive women who are only trying to use them.
Lesson isn't that all women are bad, but rather men need to stop thinking with their dicks. Sex is a weapon used by manipulative women, and making your whole life about getting sex is simply playing into their hands. There are far more important things in life than pussy.
MGTOW men generally think women are emotional, superficial and aren't worth the effort. They don't think that women need to be avoided because they are coordinating of a vast conspiracy to destroy men .
Nah, his narrative is literally the feminist mindset, with feminists already having succeeded. The only way we could be living in a matriarchy completely controlled by women is (1) women are, in fact, more capable of pulling of a vast conspiracy than men ("female supremacy") and (2) the only reason this didn't happen in the past is because men held women back to prevent them doing this (the "patriarchy").
(And yes, those two ideas are actually at odds with each other, but such is the feminist mindset).
Because she's a pretty face. Duh. Sex sells.
Let’s be clear: the work of science has nothing whatever to do with consensus. Consensus is the business of politics. Science, on the contrary, requires only one investigator who happens to be right, which means that he or she has results that are verifiable by reference to the real world. In science consensus is irrelevant. What is relevant is reproducible results. The greatest scientists in history are great precisely because they broke with the consensus.
Crazy thots thrive on attention. And here we are giving her attention with two posts about her.
Maybe we should stop talking about her rather that doing what she wants.
We're not allowed to do anything except die
We need to stop fighting on their turf and make our own turf. Decentralise. Not being reliant on single systems. Step out of the digital world and into the real world.
Here in NZ, our current protestors occupying Parliament just weathered a large storm in tents. They now have an overload of supplies - hay to soak up the mud delivered by farmers, wet weather gear, ear plugs to block out harassing music, portable heaters, a huge supply of food. The thing is, none of these came from donations to a single website. It was all bought or collected, donated, and delivered by volunteers. Volunteers were offering these people showers and places to get dry. Decentralised individuals. There's no easy way to shut that down. Sure, we're a small country and it was all somewhat haphazard, but it works. And more than that, it involves people doing a lot more than clicking a few buttons, and instead getting off their arses and actually being involved in the movement. Becoming an actual part of it. That is how we build a new society. That is how we win.
I'm confident the Canadian truckers will find a way around this. They're competent and resourceful people. They fix problems. And they have a sufficient public support to keep the movement supplied, in one way or another.
GIF compression is lossless but limited to 256 colours. This image is uploaded as a JPEG and looks like it has JPEG compression artifacts.
LOL. The majority of women in any country that gets taken over don't run, they stay and fuck the victors.
He's a feminist (well, his beliefs are) so no surprises there.
Realistically, the number of people they can visit is rather small, given the man-hours it would take. I'm starting to think reports like this do more to undermine the protest movement, by keeping people afraid, than they do to help by making people aware of police corruption. Not that it shouldn't be reported, but more that the shouldn't be sensationalized.
The fight is well and truly underway in NZ. What are you waiting for over there?
You might want to look up Tess Lawrie as well, and note the difference in her behaviour to Andrew Hill.
Omicron is suspicious as fuck. The genetic distance from BA1 variant to Wuhan is so large it doesn't seem to be a descendant of that virus (they instead likely have a most recent common ancestor a few years back). The BA2 variant is distant from BA1 and Wuhan as well, most recent common ancestor estimated to be circa 2017-2018. Likely evidence that SARS-CoV-2 existed prior 2019. But with evidence also of gain-of-function stuff, who knows.
permanently now
What are you going to do when MSFT goes full pro-women? The fireworks will be fun. Smart money is not being "permanently" anything but avoiding lock-in as far as possible. Company goes too "woke" then take your money elsewhere.
Have you tried, I don't know, actually doing something rather than just whining about other people not doing something about it?
I'm convinced the whole "victimhood" narrative is a trap set up by left-wing individuals (who are actually racist) to ensure these minorities never gain any ground. To improve oneself and one's community requires hard work and a focus fixing one's faults and getting more skilled and more capable. This is impossible if one focuses on how one is a "victim" in an "unfair" world as that worldview ultimately results in a loss of agency.
Regardless, I didn't even mention them, you did
Yeah, I admit, it was me, not you, who brought up the topic of women. It's because I've had a bone to pick about this and saw an opening so went for it.
When I originally saw your comments regarding women (years/months ago) , I quite liked them "Here is someone that isn't a tradcuck, who doesn't believe women are all angels and must be protected from all the evil men."
It didn't take long for me for these comments to rub me the wrong way in a bad way. Somewhat embarrassingly, I've only just figured out why. It's because your beliefs are closely aligned to that of a feminist.
The core feminist idea is "patriarchy theory", which posits that men have been conspiring to keep women down for centuries. Closely connected to this is the idea of female supremacy, that women are somehow better and more capable than men. These two ideas cannot really logically co-exist - if women were actually more capable than men, then men could not have held them at bay for that long. Equally, if men were actually capable of conspiring to keep women down, and successful at that for centuries, then it would be prima facie evidence that men really were more capable than women, not the other way round.
The only way your ideas of a vast female conspiracy can be true is if (1) women really are better than men (whether this is at deceiving/blackmail or whatever, they still are better) and (2) patriarchy theory is true - it was only men conspiring to keep these vastly capable women from coming to power than protected men from the horrors of this matriarchy. In other words, your core beliefs are feminist. And this is why I dislike them.
The actual reality is both ideas are bunk - men and women are different on average, and historically had different domains of influence and power. Women's obsession with being "equal" or "better" than men largely stems from an inferiority complex, where they are focused in trying to prove themselves better than someone else (i.e. men, and usually futilely), rather than focusing on trying to improve themselves as individuals. Women are also no more capable off pulling of such a vast conspiracy than men would be, because ultimately, they just flawed humans, not omnipotent goddesses. Of course, women are capable of discriminating against men, whether in education, in justice or family law, or something else, but this is simply bigotry, not a vast conspiracy.
If women/feminists really were capable of pulling off a vast global conspiracy where they specifically targeted boys with "vaccine" injury, then honestly, they probably do deserve to be in charge because that would show they vastly outplayed men.
But they're not, of course. They're really good in acting in unison and whining for men to fix things, but not so good at actually accomplishing anything directly.
Your over-the-top obsession with women reeks to me of an inferiority complex. Stop it. Be a man. You don't need to whine about things. Just be better than them. Outcompete them. Like a man.
A literal clown or a literal fucking clown? Because I don't see much fucking happening - and here you had me all excited!
Or being the driving force of the hysteria from day one?
To be fair, this is partly on men for being a bunch of wusses. "A woman made me do it" is a tale as old as time, and that well-known story in a well-known book about this is meant, in my mind, to be a call for men to not blindly follow what a woman says, and to not expect that "I was just listening to a woman" would be any excuse when the reckoning comes.
No shit. Have you just figured this out?
I think you're giving them too much credit. I don't think they actually have a big master plan. They're just weak people driven by their basic, flawed, impulses.
Yep. A lesson men have to learn is to keep it in their pants. Far too many men seem to think that sexual liberation was a boon for men. Sure, it has some benefits for some men, but it also has normalised sex as an obsession for men - how many men see their "notch count" as some kind of measure of success? This isn't success, it's just an indication of how much power men have willingly given to their sexual urges, and by implication, those they keep trying to bed.