10
Sneak_King 10 points ago +10 / -0

If someone says that, I automatically assume they're a native English speaker with an IQ of 95 trying to excuse their mistakes.

16
Sneak_King 16 points ago +16 / -0

Since there is no good reason not to like us, is God’s disfavor toward the Jews [...] just despise us irrationally?

The yid mindset, and cause for all of yid history, distilled to one sentence.

14
Sneak_King 14 points ago +14 / -0

When PF was in the news last year (year before?) I asked over on ConPro what their bona fides were. I was pointed to PF's "official" video channel, which was dozens, if not hundreds of two minute clips. They were all shaky, handheld shit of someone tagging a concrete wall. The titles all mentioned different cities, but they all could have been different edits of one guy spending a half hour at a single semi loading dock.

I don't know if PF are feds, I just know they aren't legit.

11
Sneak_King 11 points ago +11 / -0

I would speculate about crisis actors or families being bought out, but I don't have a trillion dollars in the event one of them sues me.

9
Sneak_King 9 points ago +9 / -0
  1. A new marketing angle or fed grant is identified and a toxic chemical concoction is whipped up.

  2. The toxins are injected into humans. Many die, including a striking amount of infants.

  3. The proportion of infants murdered from this blend is compared to the proportion murdered by a toxic blend already for sale. The rates are found to be comparable. The government declares this blend Safe and Effective.

Does the film cover all that?

19
Sneak_King 19 points ago +19 / -0

Public transit summons niggers and homeless. Always fight public transit as hard as you can.

17
Sneak_King 17 points ago +17 / -0

First thought: The King has returned!

Second thought: Roland wasn't really a historical figure, how is his sword real?

Turns out it's a (possibly 800 year old) tourist trap they've decided to call Durandal.

7
Sneak_King 7 points ago +7 / -0

He has to say it directly to each of them. It doesn't work if it's second hand.

2
Sneak_King 2 points ago +2 / -0

Global shipping is one of the most polluting activities humans engage in, by orders of magnitude if I recall correctly.

This never gets addressed and the pollution it causes is conveniently not attributed to any single country.

Just another piece of evidence that they don't care about the environment, they just care about killing you.

44
Sneak_King 44 points ago +45 / -1

+NIGGER license

8
Sneak_King 8 points ago +8 / -0

I'd ask him to pass a message to Brutus, Judas, and Lucifer, except I've got nothing to say to those fucks, either.

1
Sneak_King 1 point ago +1 / -0

Little Sisters as a sort of "virtuous blood libel" is so incredibly obvious in retrospect, I'm embarrassed a youtuber had to point it out for me.

6
Sneak_King 6 points ago +6 / -0

What gets me is they redefine words so 'media literacy' becomes 'agreeing with the message' and they will have thousand-comment threads about how non-leftists can't grasp things like Starship Troopers because they lack "media literacy."

2
Sneak_King 2 points ago +2 / -0

I was employing a little hyperbole.

While purchasing power is a fraction of a fraction of a percent of what it was 150 years ago, I'm wondering if nascent consumerism played a significant role is the lifestyle maintenance of the middle class.

Everything else being equal, I wonder what kind of budgetary difference it would make if a family in 1950 (or 1850) only used 'traditional' foods and materials in their lives.

1
Sneak_King 1 point ago +1 / -0

Church messaging works on the midwit curve. In this case, the 85 IQ message is "vote how your husband tells you." The 115 IQ message is "vote how your husband tells you to strengthen his household, because you shouldn't be voting at all."

The message isn't "God-fearing women stop voting."

4
Sneak_King 4 points ago +4 / -0

Can you fathom enlightened and compassionate white peoples just casually reversing “muh women’s rights”?

Not the enlightened ones, but I can definitely see churches reining women in as the continue to build toward independence. I think Doug Wilson just put out a video about the Biblical case for why women shouldn't be allowed to vote.

2
Sneak_King 2 points ago +2 / -0

4e didn't have the sprawling build-crafting that 3.5e made its name on (and 5e returned to) but it was a miniature tactics game. Agree to disagree, but I don't see how a game where you only control one unit could get much crunchier than 4e.

3
Sneak_King 3 points ago +3 / -0

Again, sounds like you didn't play it. 1 HP minions were a defining feature.

I won't disagree with your assessment on the action economy, but the big picture is that 4e was a tactics game, unlike basically anything since OD&D. It basically defined the genre of 'combat-as-sport.' So, yeah, fighters had "slots" and that looks weird from an AD&D perspective. But within that framework, roles were actually mechanically enforced. No one could AoE like a wizard. No one could tank like a fighter. You could piece together a build to have a couple "out of role" powers and serve as an off-tank or a high damage fighter or whatever, but the classic classes always did better in their niches.

3
Sneak_King 3 points ago +3 / -0

It sounds like you never played 4e. Like most cultural institutions, WotC didn't lean hard into faggotry until the 2010s, well after 4e's dev was finished.

4e was pretty unpopular. The infiltrators pretty categorically target wildly popular brands.

4e wasn't simple. Unlike 3.5e, it was just organized.

3
Sneak_King 3 points ago +3 / -0

A COMPUTER CAN NEVER BE HELD ACCOUNTABLE

THEREFORE A COMPUTER MUST NEVER MAKE A MANAGEMENT DECISION

2
Sneak_King 2 points ago +2 / -0

Don't get me started on how it's not "automated space communism" but in fact Conservatism writ large. Larger, in fact, than anyone should be comfortable with.

Or do get me started and I'll lay out the circumstantial evidence that only Europe and the Americas survived WWIII and the subsequent implication that the bright future on display is a consequence of global nigger, chink, and pajeet removal.

5
Sneak_King 5 points ago +5 / -0

Hot damn. It just clicked that labor theory of value rejects intrinsic value in favor of defined value. Just like their approach to morality and language. Obvious in retrospect, but I'd never seen it phrased that way before.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›