So she labored long and hard to get a PhD in cognitive neuroscience to earn her thesis on Sequence Learning in Patients with Parkinson's Disease which I’m sure was groundbreaking and changed the field and then, rather than continue to find treatments or cures for Parkinson’s - she promptly got a “science writing” certificate and became a “science journalist.“ Winning awards for “great journalism” like “how science helps us live longer” and “vaccines - you can trust the science” (but yknow - non-GMO food is poison) Scientific American stopped being known for it’s science long ago and is to science what readers digest was to literature.
You've heard the story about how a state government wanted to change Pi from 3.14 to just "3" because they thought that would make math easier for children?
The bill was written and it had the votes to pass until a mathematician stepped in during a recess and the bill was tabled on return from recess.
It's not "trickery" - he's arguing for SUBJECTIVE math where "facts" can mean different things depending upon "context". Y'know like... race... or sex... or whatever the communists into thought control want you to believe today. The point is to take away your agency. YOU are never qualified to form your own opinion as to what is real - those in charge will tell you citizen.
That's why there's "57 genders" (with new ones being discovered every day). That's why Feminists are now evil if they don't believe that men are women.
It's not about truth or objectivity anymore - it's all about destabilizing the populace and to keep changing the narrative so that they either give up or slovenly follow the edicts from on high.
So... from his murderpedia page he wanted to "kill a whitey", confessed to the shooting and shot the white teenager point blank in the face after ordering him onto the ground execution style.
But "racism" affected his trial and the death penalty is too harsh. Followed probably by being released for Covid reasons.
Which brings me to my warning: if you are an Open Source developer and own/lead a project, and have an established name, brand, logo or trademark for it, please think twice about joining this "commons" that will become the owner of your work's identity; the part of the Open Source software that makes your project yours. Don't think you are too small of a developer to be interesting; and don't think you need a lawyer to own a trademark (all that takes is doing some research on previous uses of your brand name, and if not in conflict, simply publicly making a claim with intent to actively use the trademark (TM) and defending it if someone tries to steal it from you). Don't give away your IP, certainly not to the likes of an org that seems very heavily Google-influenced and Google-sourced! As far as I can tell they will be able to, and likely will, hold your trademark and brand hostage.
Murkowski has already tweeted she won’t vote for SC justice until after the election.