5
SicilianOmega 5 points ago +5 / -0

Their ideal man is some kid who inherited a billion dollars from his dad.

7
SicilianOmega 7 points ago +7 / -0

That's before the comment gets removed and the user who posted it gets banned.

8
SicilianOmega 8 points ago +8 / -0

what do we do to bring men back to the left

And the answer they come up with is "Break up with your boyfriend! 4B!"

12
SicilianOmega 12 points ago +12 / -0

The theater kid is immunized against all dangers: one may call him a scoundrel, parasite, swindler, profiteer, it all runs off him like water off a raincoat. But call him a theater kid and you will be astonished at how he recoils, how injured he is, how he suddenly shrinks back: “I’ve been found out.”

1
SicilianOmega 1 point ago +1 / -0

So, if you're keepin some sort of list of your enemies, then WE SHOULD NOT BE ON THAT LIST!

Unfortunately for them, there are two lists, made by two of their buddies.

10
SicilianOmega 10 points ago +10 / -0

This is just like 2016, when college kids played with Play-Doh to cope with Hillary losing.

24
SicilianOmega 24 points ago +24 / -0

Yeah, because the AP is so impartial.

3
SicilianOmega 3 points ago +3 / -0

Trump is going to take away their classified CIA black budget money, then they won't be able to afford to make unprofitable games.

1
SicilianOmega 1 point ago +1 / -0

What you're suggesting is forgetting how to build a carriage.

Engines are advanced technology that requires other advanced technology to make. We may still have carriages after a collapse, but they'll have horses in front of them.

1
SicilianOmega 1 point ago +1 / -0

The Greeks lost the Antikythera Mechanism, and the Romans forgot how to make concrete. What prevents us from losing the automobile?

13
SicilianOmega 13 points ago +13 / -0

Our involvement in that war was the biggest own-goal in all of history.

1
SicilianOmega 1 point ago +1 / -0

Past civilizations didn't have cars and planes, which are highly complex technologies we wouldn't be able to maintain after a collapse, and we depend on them for everything. If we lost those and had to go back to using horses and sailboats, the size of our continent and the presence of mountains would become significant obstacles, even if the Interstates remained for centuries. Going from New York to Los Angeles would take months, like it did in the 1800s.

1
SicilianOmega 1 point ago +1 / -0

England and South Africa have tiny landmasses compared to America. Even the entire UK has a tiny landmass compared to America, and it's home to at least four distinct ethnicities (English, Welsh, Scottish, and Irish).

There has been no ethnostate of comparable inhabited landmass to the US in human history.

And technology does get lost, particularly when advanced societies collapse. The Greeks had analogue computers and Greek fire, unknown in the middle ages. By WW2, we had reinvented analogue computers, but the closest we've ever gotten to reinventing Greek fire was napalm, which wasn't invented until the Vietnam war. Modern concrete is still inferior to Roman concrete. The Romans had steam engines, didn't exploit them fully, and then they were lost and reinvented 1400 years later. The Egyptians could build giant pyramids that the Romans, Greeks, Chinese, and pre-industrial Europeans could not. We could just barely build them, but the cost would be extreme.

2
SicilianOmega 2 points ago +2 / -0

It'll take a thousand years for Americans' DNA to get so thoroughly mixed that it's a single ethnicity, and it will only happen if society doesn't collapse back into the stone age. Without modern transportation, a Minnesotan would almost never meet a Texan, and over a thousand years their language would diverge.

6
SicilianOmega 6 points ago +6 / -0

America is too big to have a single ethnicity. New Englander and Appalachian are separate ethnicities, for example.

4
SicilianOmega 4 points ago +4 / -0

Censors: expected, except the Viet Cong/commie thing. Is that something that can't even be mentioned? Or just referred to negatively?

I guarantee that they wouldn't have a problem with a game where you play as the VC.

5
SicilianOmega 5 points ago +5 / -0

It's not about the votes anymore. They need to control the narrative around whatever their next move is going to be, whether that's a blatant steal, riots, or a military coup.

view more: Next ›