The books burned by the Nazis were pseudo-science books mostly written by leftists. For example hyper-sexualization books, sexualization books meant for minors, "gender theory", and various other degenerate things. Also books that meant to lie about history.
You know, the same as today.
Oh, and you are the pinnacle of truth? Glad you know everything and are confident enough to outright ban users over it.
Do you know what I hate most? Not mere stupidity, not even arrogance, not even maliciousness. It's this pure arrogance combined with stubbornness and ignorance. You represent that perfectly.
Just think, the comment you deleted CANNOT BE SEEN and you cannot be argued with. WHO THE FUCK would take YOUR word for anything you say? Who do you even want to convince?
And what the fuck is with your post history... you are a rabid janitor who is out of control, sniffing his own farts. You are just hated by most people, and you do a terrible job... unless your job is to ruin the forum.
You are the type of person who'd fit perfectly into some censorship job as a cogwheel in the machine of the Soviet Union. You know, for example when someone requests documents, you are the one striking through large swaths of text with a black marker. Or, in a higher position, you'd be the one determining which returning Soviet soldier has to be put into gulags for witnessing things he wasn't allowed to. Pathetic.
It's almost like the victors of WWII wrote history, and it happens to align perfectly with their narratives and their intent to push homosexuality and racial "diversity."
Imagine I tell you about 2 games and everything I say about the first is positive, and everything I say about the second is negative. Oh and if you question anything, or ask questions, I can legally apply violence.
What a coincidence! Truly peculiar.
And immediately debased it.
You mean during the war that was forced upon Germany? Or before, in which case do you have some source to read up on that?
I mean the economic boom occurred anyway, so regardless of that, it lasted long enough for that.
Read Gobbels accounts of the war.
How about you link something instead of me having to go through data for hours, in order to eventually counter myself? I tried to look for it myself btw, but it seems made up.
I can't quite tell if it's just more ignorance of history or outright lies.
I don't lie. Lying is pathetic and truth is on my side.
The NSDAP did literally none of those things.
Uh, based! But still, they are complaining about the holocaust till today. But yeah, they pretty much removed a lot of bad influences from the people.
None of those things are jewish influences, first and foremost.
Did you even check the links I provided before? The book burnings are quite relevant to this btw. "What type of books were burned?" is something nobody asks:
A recently published book, Gay Berlin, reveals the history of the city as a liberal hotbed of homosexuality before the Nazis came to power in 1933. Berlin was known as a mecca for cross-dressers, transsexuals, and those seeking male-to-female surgery.
The Frankfurt School, a group of German-Jewish intellectuals in the early 20th century, has been credited as the architects of leftism.
They, including Magnus Hirschfeld, were the authors. They also created the terms "homosexual" and "transvestite." Please don't belittle jewish contributions!
homosexuality was present within the NSDAP itself
What, there were 2 closeted homosexuals? And that is equal to a "liberal hotbed of homosexuality"? Oh come on, that attempt was very cheap.
because most people already weren't allowed to get loans under the Nazis
Good. Being in debt is not something anyone should strive for.
The economic recovery of Germany occurred under the Weimar period.
Oh, you mean before Hitler replaced the currency with a system in which 1 hour of labor equaled 1 of the currency? Was it when people were pushing wheelbarrows of money due to hyper-inflation, which was urgent because over the course of 1 day it may have become worthless? Was it before or after Germany stopped paying insane reparations for WWI? Was it after or before they arrested a Rothschild? I think you are mixing up time a bit.
This is why Germany was suffering a famine in 1941 while it was winning the war.
What? I can't find anything about that. Did you just make it up?
Foreginers can't exist in Fascist or National Socialist states. Most of the time in Fascist states, they would be assimilated.
During Olympics foreigners are required, as guests. And the Red Cross from Switzerland that visited the concentration camps and made reports. And other Whites can be guests as well. This "foreigner" thing was really only about jews to be honest. Germany had no problems with Austrians, Swedes, Norwegians, Hungarians, Belgians, Swiss, etc.
It's your policy.
No. Literally nobody cares about it.
Your position is his position.
I haven't told you my views at all. What Hitler did at his time was reasonable (arrest and deport communists, degenerates, self-declared enemies of Germany), but today we are facing much bigger issues.
Asserting "jewish" influences solely defined by Marxism, degeneracy, and usruy.
Oh, not "solely"... you can add Feminism and Consumerism to the mix too, if that's any consolation.
No, you're intentionally assuming things.
Maybe you weren't clear with: "There isn't a difference."?
No, you're intentionally conflating preference and "I will exclusively hire people of my race". That is ideological.
So you think hiring 90% of a certain race ("preference") vs 100% ("exclusive") is such a big difference that one is ideological, and the other is natural? If we'd go by nature, it would be 99%+ btw... so wouldn't it make sense to assume the former with the "preference" is the ideological one that is deviating from the norm? Maybe an ideology that ignores everything except pure selfish monetary benefit, that is sociopathically utilitarian in that pursuit? At which % does it start to become more like the leftists' ideology? 75%? 60%? 50%? 0%? They literally have quotas btw.
National Socialism.
It's so weird how dangerously close that is to that "Common sense" ideology. Unless of course you consider "Nature" to contradict common sense... in that case damn that filthy evolution!
Yes, because National Socialists are Leftists. Most of their agenda is the same.
That's exactly what I said in the past too. Boy was that stupid. Common conservative rhetoric nonsense. But let me highlight their agendas in a comparison:
Marxist Socialists: They believe in "equality", believing all humans are born equal, and stripped of equality due to the inherent corruption of society. Thus altering society according to their ideas of wealth equality should bring society to a "fair" and "just" status.
Problem: Equality is a fabrication, a myth, entertained only as an idea, as fiction, but with no root in reality. So it ended in genocide and a LOT of corruption to a point bribery was often occurring.
National Socialists: They believe foreign interference causes harm to a nation, and that only natives of that country should be in charge of the country. They seek to eliminate harmful vectors like degeneracy and usury, usually coming from foreigners in order to improve all people of the country.
The rest? Not sure if that matters much, but being nationally protectionist is clearly important to them. Communists called them "capitalists" if that means anything.
And here is the third side: Conservatives: They have no inherent belief except to preserve the status quo, and maybe lean towards Libertarianism while ignoring all consequences in a naive way. They are patriotic to the imagination of what their country is, but they have zero intent to EVER restore it to its former glory. Instead they pride themselves about how they are not "racist" (and accuse leftists to be), how they are the ones who actually love homosexuality and transvestites. But it should just be reasonable, you know? At least inform the parents that you are going to chop their dicks off - that is the right amount of pushback for them. They long settled with the idea of homosexual marriage, and that the "cultural melting pot" is forever going to haunt them and their children.
The political spectrum is a triangle, "left" and "right" is insufficient to describe them. It leads to the mistake that you conflate 2 ideologies that are in staunch opposition to another.
No, hierarchies in society form naturally regardless of race or ethnic group.
Oligarchy is not the result of mere hierarchy. And it also matters if it's merit that lands you there or pure exploitative-amoral behavior. You could argue it's normal that it's the latter.
You're thinking that evidence of one jew in a hierarchy means evidence of a jewish racially controlled hierarchy.
One? Well, someone did some research and calculation. If the Rothschild wouldn't be artificially excluded from these lists, they'd all occupy the top 9. Of the "official" top 9, Mark Zuckerberg, Larry Ellison, Michael Bloomberg are jewish. So of the top 18 there are 12 jews, which makes it 66%. That's a little more than "one", isn't it?
There isn't a difference.
So you think discriminating against all races except your own, and discriminating against Whites only is practically the same? We are entering 2+2=5 area here. They are not the same, you just pretend it is out of ideological reasons. Maybe you believe the only relevant distinction is "racist" vs "non-racist"?
Yeah, those are the same thing, and it's not 'natural' behavior.
Preferring your own species, race and tribe is natural for humanity for its entire existence minus the past century for Whites, and natural for ALL other humans and animals. So what "ideology" are you talking about? "Common sense?"
or affiliated with, members of the NSDAP, who are championing the anti-white rhetoric they have now.
So do we have to talk about the very concept of "change"? This is just some wild, baseline nonsense in a desperate attempt to make a point. You know it's nonsense, but you will play it in hopes it lands.
Leftists of the past were "racist" by your definition, and it's quite plausible to assume they had interactions with the NSDAP, as they likely shared agendas. After WWII, things started to change. The Marxists have taken over the US Democrat party, and it slowly turned into the neo-Marxist mess it is today. Not a single person would vote for both, the US Democrats of the past and today.
Oligarchy is not a natural outcome of rulers being jews. That's actually sillier than I anticipated.
Weird how it always happens though. In the Soviet Union corruption was rampant, and there were "party members" who were filthy rich and powerful. Today, well, is that even in question? With a plethora of international big corporations and Rothschild central banks installed everywhere? Plus Blackrock and Vanguard? And ESG?
No, you'd be a DEI officer.
Oh, I thought I'd be a "white supremacist" then? But to clarify, DEI doesn't work like you think it works. Anybody can be a DEI hire, and the point is to seek racial and gender quotas, prioritizing that over competence and the well-being of the business. If you hire your own race, it's just natural behavior. You could argue that an Indian hiring only Indians qualifies as a DEI agenda, because being anti-White is part of it, but that violates even DEI principles of forced diversity. They may tolerate it though, because being anti-White is their highest priority.
Leftism is not inherently anti-white.
Weird, let me reiterate some agendas:
- They promote degeneracy, weakening the cultural-societal foundation of our people
- They promote the mass importation of foreigners, which effectively is a genetic genocide
- They promote the resource transfer from Whites to foreigners (welfare)
- They promote race mixing ("cultural melting pot")
- They promote acts of violence against Whites
- They accuse Whites of "racism" whenever possible, but ignore things like racial groups that discriminate against Whites
- They enact injustice directed against Whites
- They have Antifa as "civil" troops to target White dissidents
Oh, or do you mean they are not blatantly explicit about it? Well, they are...
In a 2021 lecture at Yale University titled “The Psychopathic Problem of the White Mind,” psychiatrist Aruna Khilanani described her “fantasies of unloading a revolver into the head of any white person that got in my way, burying their body and wiping my bloody hands as I walked away relatively guiltless with a bounce in my step, like I did the world a favor.”
Is that blatant and obvious enough?
Leftism was invented by whites.
"Invented" is a weird term. But let's see: Feminism was spearheaded by jews. The term "cultural melting pot" was coined by a jew (Israel Zangwill). Bolshevism was a predominantly controlled by jews (70% in the Russian congress were literal jews masquerading as Russians). Mass immigration is predominantly lead by jews (listen to one tell it herself).
Also the reason is simple, their average IQ ranges from 70 to 80. From there everything else follows, including lack of impulse control, high aggression, low work ethics, welfare leeching. Today it's 60% of crimes committed by ~12% of the population (it was 13/50 before).
Even now, you are attempting to deflect from the primary argument: "the jews are in a race war".
What kind of statement is that even? Who made it? There is no race war.
You don't believe that you are in an eternal race war with the Indonesians.
Sure, the Indonesians do not control our media, promote 3rd world immigration, own the central banks, run ESG, have almost all politicians in their pockets, have spearheaded every Bolshevik coup, spearheaded feminism, promoted every degeneracy in existence.
Only the jews,
Well. Guess who didn't do any of that: Muslims, Indians, blacks, gypsies, women, men, aristocracy, monarchy.
and it is because you are pushing Judeo-Capitalism.
Huh? Do you mean Oligarchy? That's a natural outcome of their rule. It was no different in the Soviet Union, no different in the West today.
you're not even arguing as a racist, just a socialist.
Uh, I've argued only 2 points. One was about racial preferences, one was about the concept of "conspiracy" versus natural behavior, which reaches into the topic of evolution itself. For example I am not having a conspiracy with my neighbor when I mow her lawn.
I don't see any disagreement on your side btw.
Yes, that actually requires a conspiracy by a specific DEI hire.
A conspiracy requires the collusion of multiple people (she did it alone, unbeknownst to others in the company), whereas the parties have to neglect their actual interests (hire competent workers) for the sake of another agenda (only hire same race as oneself). So it was a conspiracy between her and the brick wall or what? No, it was her own doing. And it's not some rare exception to the rule - there is a noticeable pattern.
And it didn't even have to be DEI if she was Indian herself. I wouldn't be a "DEI hire" if I'd only hire Whites as the same role.
but they are not being done by a race. They are being done by Leftists. This is one of the reasons why white people accept it.
All based on an ideology that is openly anti-White. Let me introduce you to the reason for its existence, explained by a jew himself.
And here's a link about who the leaders of ESG are, just in case there way any doubt.
but because Leftists agree with themselves.
Sure... but how does one become a leftist? This is not the outcome of a process of aristocratic thinking. It's the result of indoctrination and propaganda.
Inferiority? What? Didn't he just claim something about how they managed to convince White people to neglect their own racial self-preference, which no other race does?
And that's provable fact btw. If politics isn't already telling, surveys have shown that ONLY Whites say they have no racial preference towards any race while Blacks, Hispanics, Indians, Orientals all prefer their own race/nation over others.
conspiracy [theory?]
Does it soothe your mind if it's just their natural behavior to do things that lead to race wars (aka being leftists up to the most extreme leftists), that doesn't require any collusion?
Just as some Indian HR lady who got newly hired on some big company ONLY hired Indians, which went on for how long... until they got ~20 new employees, all of whom were Indians? There was no collusion, therefore no "conspiracy" either.
Or there is an ESG system in place that incentivizes companies to abide by their ideological doctrines simply for monetary reasons?
So, you don't even recognize the problems, there you go.
Everything is fine, why are these silly goyim so upset, right?
And then one day, for no reason at all, out of nowhere... how could this happen?! Why am I persecuted so much?!
You need to assume I'm jewish
It really doesn't matter. If you are, you should know. If you aren't, you should know too. If you think I am wrong, feel free to pick any topic and argue about it - I seek to be correct and adhere to truth.
Everything revolving around WWII, Weimar times, the creation of israel, USS Liberty, Bolshevism, Transatlantic Slave Trade, coin clipping, human sacrifice rituals, the Gates of Toledo, 9/11, ESG, Blackrock, Rothschild, Vanguard, social media shapeshifting, feminism, various other examples of today, the oh-so "sacred" 6 million number appearing since ~1920, the myth of jews being prohibited from doing manual labor.
Pick any topic you feel most confident in. Sure I am a misguided idiot, right? It should be easy to prove me wrong.
- If you do not recognize the problems, it means you indulge in or even enjoy the disintegration of society. It's politically what the Democrats stand for.
- If you recognize the problems, but refuse to accept the perpetrators (and therefore do nothing against it), you are in the camp of Conservatives and Republicans.
- If you recognize the problems, and identify the perpetrators, you are an evil Nazi. Or a jew who supports it (aka the problems are seen as positives, and the perpetrators are the good guys).
So which one applies to you?
Everything you said is wrong
Amazing argument. Wow, it's probably up there with "no."
and jews don't care about you
They knowingly and willingly indulge in market losses by injecting hardcore leftist agendas in movies, series and games. So apparently they care more about having strong females and black injects than economic feasibility. Oh and just today I heard a black guy on Twitch wanted all White slave owners and their descendants be dead, and he got no repercussions for that. Is that a good indicator for you how they do care? (btw, 40% of jews owned slaves in the US, while <1% of Christians did)
That's why my children aren't in danger from them, but from you.
As my people are in danger from you and your kin. In the last century the jews have caused the death of tens of millions of Whites. But this time it's just the soothing genocide via importing hordes of non-Whites as race-mixing is vehemently promoted. Oh, that's totally better than a regular genocide! Actually it's my favorite way of getting genocided by jews!
If your people succeed, you will be in physical danger from non-White hordes. What do you think happens when that buffer of Whites is gone, aside from the collapse of infrastructure, rolling blackouts, rise in crime? They will come for those who are more successful than "dirt poor" and call them white devils.
If we succeed, well, yes. And you'd be surprised how quickly it would solve ALL the problems. Or do you even deny that there is any problem at all?
and do worse than what you think jews would do
I don't think that's possible. I mean mass murder via exhaustion from slave labor is already quite on top. And the world wars exactly fun and games either.
All I see is: "Yes, you summed up the position quite succinctly"
Mostly, yes. I just told you why that position emerged and why it's reasonable to have it. Why are jews obsessed with the idea that they have been persecuted for millennia for no reason at all except maybe that the stupid goyim were jealous of them. The narcissism, arrogance and deception is insane. Well - the answer is to continue the deception and eternal victimhood narratives.
I mean just imagine one day a bunch of children including yours were missing, and then the boys in the village found them at some shady demonic human sacrifice ritual, but they were killed on an altar. And it's not one deranged crazy person who did it, but a group of people who are all jews and worshiped some satanic deity (Moloch = Satan). Of course they have been executed and/or expelled after such things.
Inter-temporal means "throughout all time"
I know what it means, and I know you meant it derogatorily. And to be precise, it means "across time", or "involving different time periods" - and not "all time." So you were actually correct.
If this upsets you, you should be mad at your people. Everything could have been fine, but jews HAD to be cosmopolitan internationalists who seek to unite the world if they want it or not. And that harms us all, even you.
international
This is a 100% fit.
inter-temporal
Spanning longer time periods? Some say centuries, some millennia, some would argue 2000+ years.
racial conspiracy
Yes. Or why do you think almost every White country is flooded by excessive amounts of non-Whites? It's not like we have an international migration of all races everywhere - it's all one way. So clearly it happens - if it's a "conspiracy" is irrelevant. It happens and requires the cooperation of a lot of systems and people to occur, while the vast majority of populations oppose it.
to use Judeo-Capitalism to fund and break down civilization through Judeo-Bolshevism
Bolshevism was an overwhelmingly jewish ideology, """intellectually""" driven, financed and lead by jews. Many even have these peculiar German sounding names.
"Judeo-Capitalism" is a silly term, but what you may mean is that the central banks, and therefore the finance system is in the hand of filthy rich jewish families, who finance all sorts of leftist agendas, by providing money to those who push it into the media and culture. If they fail, they fall on a cushion. Like that Assassin's Creed game with a black guy in 15th century Japan. It's obvious.
And when you see people who push these pro-homosexual, pro-transvestite, pro-pedophilia, pro-degeneracy, pro-race-mixing agendas, they are very often jewish and happen to be openly zionists. You'd think it should be ~2%, but it's way more. We are talking about overrepresentation ranging 2000-5000%.
in order to eradicate the last remaining descendants of the Aryan Hyperboreans.
To subjugate Whites and create their race-mixing utopia, in which they believe to throne over all as the intellectual-leadership elite. That's their vision, not ours. Ours is to be around our own race only. This is not different from basically every non-White country.
The issue is that we both know you'd kill me, my friends, and my entire family if you had the will to do so, and you wouldn't stop laughing to yourself about it for decades.
Oh, we'd all be fine if jews weren't as they are. But alas, they are. That's the exact way they think about their anti-White agendas, including outright murdering Whites. They did that in the last century. Eisenhower's holocaust caused the death of 10 million Germans after the war. Dresden's bombing killed hundred thousands of civilians - there were no military targets, and they knew a lot of refugees were there. They did that to "demoralize the Nazis." They killed civilians intentionally. They used bombs explicitly for that purpose, causing Germans to literally burn alive as they sink into the asphalt.
The Bolsheviks killed a fair share of Whites and the Russian monarchy - what followed then was a century long tyranny, in which saying the wrong thing lead to slave labor with eventual death in gulags. 20+ million Christians were murdered that way, and God knows how many had to suffer slave labor. All of this was conducted overwhelmingly by jews.
And the reason Nazis emerged in Germany is because they knew about that. They knew about the jewish threat. And the past ~2 decades were filled with jewish atrocities - jewish-communist coup attempts, WWI orchestrated by bankers, Germany surrendering WWI the worst possible way, excessive levels of degeneracy (homosexuality, transvestism, pornography, prostitution, pedophilia, child prostitution, hyper-inflation).
The "Allies" even provoked WWII. Do you know why? They couldn't let Germany show the world how to get unhooked by the jewish banking systems and remove their degeneracy AND still thrive. Oh, they thrived a lot, they had an economic boom that was unprecedented. So they had to be destroyed ASAP. How did they provoke WWII? Simple. Britain assured Poland to help if Germany declares war on them... for murdering Germans in occupied German areas like Danzig.
So let me get this straight - there is a group of 100 aliens (green skin, weird eyes, weird language), who push manage to push an agenda, and then there are 5 who are the most notorious pushers of that agenda... directed at humans. These 100 aliens aren't so convincing, but oh boy, these 5 people are really significant.
So you claim the 100 aliens are irrelevant and that these 5 are spearheading it?
But why is everybody in glass tanks fueling alien spaceships' propulsion then?
He cries in pain as he strikes you.
Basically this. Not only are the elections fraudulent, the fraud must be INSANE. A close 50-50 race in Georgia? Laughable. This is programmatically achieved. Then there is that spike again that flips everything.
You accuse him of "lying", not fraud, because fraud is a criminal act that is intended to gain material personal advantage, and it does not necessitate the act of lying. Deception and psychological tricks can do it too.
That's exactly what you did. Here:
You claimed X happened, someone else (probably) said Y happened, and you claim that you are right and he is wrong. And not only did you delete his comment (to deprive everybody from reading it), you also banned him (so that he cannot even prove his points).
Isn't that the standard thought process of all who persecute dissidents since humanity exists, neatly summarized in the word "denial"? It suggests there is an unquestionable truth, and then some bigot asshole chooses to be evil and say the wrong thing for the lulz. Then he gets censored, jailed, burned, killed, etc.
And what if you just called it a lie (even "fraud" to make it sound scarier) so that you have a publicly legitimately appearing excuse to ban him? What if YOU were the dishonest one? You lied about it being a "fraud" after all (ignorance or an attempt to deceive?), so will you punish yourself too? Of course not, honesty, which you demand from others, is not important for you. You just want a particular narrative to prevail. And if others lie, but it's something that aligns with you, they don't face repercussions.
That is censorship. Just admit it.