https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/whore
Whore noun [ C ] US /hɔːr/ UK /hɔːr/
Old-fashioned: a female prostitute
Offensive: an offensive word for a woman who is thought to have a lot of sexual partners
A 2004 real estate investment is not evidence that "Soros backs Trump". You intentionally made it sound as if Soros gave to Trump's campaign, not that his investment fund, along with several other investment funds, put up loans to build a building in 2004.
De Simps can't help but mislead, obfuscate and lie. It's all they have.
"Soros funded Trump"? More lies. This is really all you've got, isn't it De Simp? Lies and more lies.
Do you realize how fucking ridiculous you sound?
De Santis' endorsers and donors are a matter of record. Bush and Ryan are on the record. Koch is on the record.
Just be glad I didn't bring up how the Moderna lobbyist showed up at the recent De Santis fundraiser - the one that was held at the offices of the Dominion lawyers.
Yes, really.
Trump will be the nominee, and everybody, including you, and including your bosses at the De Santis campaign, knows it.
But keep taking those sweet, sweet Koch/Bush/Ryan bucks from the De Santis campaign to post here and wherever else you post for him.
You may as well, they pay very handsomely, as far as I understand, and that money won't be flowing for very much longer. Make hay while the sun shines, paid De Simp.
I don't give a fuck what Pedro claims.
YOU claimed that Kassam was the source.
YOU said that, and YOU lied.
The same guy who wrote this piece, MAtthew Boyle, apparently also wrote the "Trump dined with far-right Nick Fuentes" hit piece so beloved of the De Santis campaign.
Most of his recent work is devoted to propping up Pence.
He's not part of Trump 2024 in any way, shape, or form.
Breitbart is not pro Trump. They are pro Israel. What they get out of publishing this piece is to further their previously stated aim of trying to eradicate 'anti-semitism' on the Right.
You said Kassam was THE SOURCE. Not that he was gloating, not that he was sharing it, that he was THE SOURCE for this story, working on behalf of the Trump campaign. Which is entirely untrue and made up by you and the De Santis influencers.
You got caught red-handed in your lie and are now backtracking, but that does not change the fact that YOU LIED.
Again, I direct you to your nearest dictionary.
that tweet from Candace is merely acknowleging reality, as all De Simps will have to do eventually.
Again, making things up about Kassam: "Probably didn't want the blowback". Are you now backtracking on your original lie that Kassam/Bannon was Breitbart's source?
Just admit you made it up out of whole cloth, De Simp. Kassam has his own publication which he is constantly promoting, and he has not spoken to anyone at Breitbart for years now. Bannon has a hugely popular podcast and has not spoken to anyone at Breitbart for years as well. If either was the source for this story, as you claim, they themselves would have published it on their own platforms.
You told more of your usual lies and simply weren't expecting to encounter anyone on here who actually knows the behind the scenes situation between Breitbart and Kassam/Bannon.
You got caught in your lie, De Simp. Just own it, and enjoy your campaign's sinking numbers.
Candace Owens is absolutely NOT a Trump 2024 shill. She dropped MAGA very publicly over a year ago. She does not speak to Trump at all. She's a De Simp like all the other Daily Wire people (except for Knowles).
Again KASSAM IS PERSONA NON GRATA AT BREITBART. He has been for YEARS now.
Kassam has his OWN publication, The National Pulse. Why the FUCK would he leak an explosive story to competitor Breitbart when he could publish it himself first?
De Simps really are astonishingly dishonest people. You all lie SO EASILY. It's second nature to you.
"Whoring" is selling sex for money. Get a dictionary.
There are many more accurate words for that behavior. "Grifter" fits her perfectly. "Whore" doesn't.
How is Kassam, Brueswitz and Loomer in any way associated with the writing of this piece on Gonzalez?
How is Trump 2024 in any way associated with the writing of this piece on Gonzalez?
Breitbart is not at all in the tank for Trump, it is far more neocon than that now.
Breitbart editors are FAR more motivated by Israel and "fighting antisemitism" than they are for anything else.
You clearly have literally NO IDEA who and what you are talking about. I have direct experience with Breitbart. You can't just fucking pull your de Simp lies out of your De Simp ass and pass them over on me. I literally know better.
Also, De Santis' numbers are in fucking free fall. Bullshitters like you are not helping him reverse that steep descent. Quite the opposite.
Nobody at Breitbart even speaks to Raheem Kassam or Steve Bannon. Lots of bad blood from when both were editors there and left.
You have no fucking idea what you are talking about, De Simp.
You are literally inventing things out of thin air and claiming they are fact.
YOU are exactly why De Santis has no chance. You are typical of the disastrous people he has "influencing" for him. Disingenuous liars who are unpleasant to be around to boot.
Go back and tell your boss Christina, or Karl, or whoever's running that shitshow.
Who did Owens whore around with? She's only had one boyfriend since coming on the scene and she's married to him now.
Since when is Breitbart "The Trump Campaign"?
Also, Candace Owens (who he terms "The Negress") is a De Simp just like Gonzalez.
Finally, that article has at least 10 examples in his own words, so it's not exactly a "smear".
They certainly did, didn't they? I'm still amazed at the Time magazine article by Molly Ball which detailed much (not all) of it:
Jeb!'s endorsement is one of the very worst endorsements possible. Right up there with being endorsed by Paul Ryan. To be endorsed by Jeb! is to lose populists everywhere.
Caitlyn's endorsement is relatively meaningless either way. It won't help, but it won't hinder either.
They never fired him. They removed him from air, barred him from company email, but kept paying him. The idea was to keep him silent through 2024 because he was leaning too far Trumpwards and Fox is pushing De Santis.
The conflict now is over whether it was him or them who first breached the contract. They are trying to enforce a non-compete, but apparently Twitter was never listed as a "competitor" so it looks like they've fucked up their silencing gambit entirely.
This is a satire site.
Someone ought to tell that to the Celts.
All A-H cares about is an high ESG score.
A big corporation cares mainly about government and regulations over profits.
A low ESG score means the government will be ON you and hunt you as if as if you were Trump, but a high ESG score means they will breezily ignore you as if you were Epstein. Or Clinton. Or Biden.
No. Be straight and true. Like an arrow.
You're just angry I caught you in the original De Simp lie you told - that Kassam/Trump 2024 is behind this article.
You got caught, and now you're not just a pathetic De Simp. You're a pathetic BIG MAD De Simp. Keep seething - it's fun to watch.