Also, if the whole world and every other race was seemingly against the "Asian" grouping, and schools were even teaching Asians to hate themselves, it would make sense to embrace the identity. Sure, don't let it erase the sub-identities, but if your enemies have grouped you together for extermination, maybe group together to fight against against it too.
I don't spend a whole lot of time there, I'm only banned from one or two...the most memorable reason being because I answered someone asking if I'd been banned for a bullshit reason...and then I got permabanned for "discussing moderation actions"...which isn't even explicitly against the rules.
Fucking bullshit. Thousands of hours in XCOM, and I get banned initially for calling out 2K, then for "discussing mods" and derailing threads...for answering someone else's question specifically directed at me. Faggots. Turbo-faggots, in fact.
Basically all I did there was help people bypass their stupid launcher that broke the game for people, and was met with nothing but approval. I literally helped people play the game, and got banned for it. No, I'm not salty, why do you ask?
Oh, come on. Don't misrepresent. Having the wrong/unapproved opinion gets you dogpiled in reported.
I like the badge, personally. It's useful to see who does or does not own the game, and it's just as useful against leftist interlopers as it is against our side's anti-woke crusaders.
Sadly, it all comes down to who is in charge, and that's leftist Steam community mods. Doesn't matter if you have the badge or not, what matters is which side you're arguing for or against.
It's made a lot simpler by the fact that switching doors is meaningless rather than detrimental if the host has no extra knowledge.
Yup. I hadn't done the full rationale, but it does seem to always break even. If chosen randomly, remaining doors minus no-prize doors, you're still left with an even chance versus your initial pick. In the three-door scenario, it's 1/3rd vs 1/3rd, and the last third is missing, so equal chances, i.e. 50/50.
And, that's a good point, even if you don't know how he's choosing, you always switch, because if he is choosing randomly it's a coin flip, and if he isn't you're increasing (sometimes very drastically depending on number of doors) your chances, so it's an overall gain.
Destiny fans are wild.
They were also in an open relationship, and he did get to fuck other girls
Didn't he himself say he wasn't fucking other women? And he looked fucking miserable in that open relationship. Sorry, super fucking cringe. I actually felt bad for him, he just looked devastated when asked if he was happy.
Also, I'm not sure if it was that relationship, but I think it was, but wasn't his girlfriend/wife basically grooming him to bang dudes? Like, they got off on it? Basically...Destiny's wife was banging sidedudes...and so was he? He wasn't just a cuck, he was a bi cuck.
His wife divorced him for a guy who threatened suicide if she wouldn't start dating him. So honestly I think she downgraded.
Yeah, I think she did. Which is wild.
And all I'm saying is, as someone who isn't adverse to talking about Jews sometimes, I also get tired of how a lot of people will act like someone is a Jew, just because they might be, and did something they don't like. This isn't directed at you, by the way, it's just something I've seen in general.
I'm not ready to say Southern is a Jew, just because there are questions floating around, and she's been shitty on some things. That's just not it, at least for me. Best I can do is she might be a Jew, but has certainly done some shitty things.
No, I was actually wrong, sadly. It does matter if it's random or intentional. It get's pretty hard to grasp, but there are ways to prove it.
When you picked, you had a 1/3 chance to pick “right.” Since probabilities sum to 1, that means there is a 2/3 chance that the prize is behind a door you did not pick. One of those doors is then eliminated and you are shown that door did not contain the prize.
In that example, if the choice is random, and he doesn't reveal the car...he had a 50% chance of the 66% chance to reveal the car, and didn't...meaning the remaining door is also 33% chance, just like the door you already chose. Or, since they're equal chance, now each is 50%, and it doesn't matter if you switch.
If he intentionally removes a known non-car, it is your example; 33% vs. 66%, and you should switch.
It can be a bit much to wrap ours heads around, since the whole concept of predetermined but random outcomes isn't really standard fare, but it does make sense.
Where it gets crazy is, to make your decision on whether you should switch doors, you need to know how the host made his decision in eliminating doors. It gets pretty mindfucky.
" You will know them by their fruits."
Yeah, except I prefer logic. You don't just get to say "Jews bad" and thus "bad people Jews." I'm not even saying there isn't Jewish behavior, and that...some undisclosed percentage of it is bad...but it's just not a compelling argument. Because non-Jews also do bad stuff. So if you know someone by their fruits, all you know is that they are bad.
"I hate Jews, and this person did something I hate, so they're a Jew" is not helpful to anyone.
It is a shame. Lauren Southern was hot, and no, I won't apologize for thinking so, and she was saying some pretty damn based things...but it was all a grift, as evidenced by her turning on them and accusing them all of sexism and retarded shit like that, and totally softening her rhetoric to try to appeal to new audiences. She should have at least committed to the bit; even if it was phony, she at least wouldn't have appeared to be a liar and hypocrite, if she'd just stuck with one bit, instead of branching out into feminism and betrayal.
I've said it before, but all women are at least partially feminist. They can't seem to help it, and it usually comes out at one point or another. It's a real shame. No matter how based she might be, any woman seems to carry that spark of feminism, that massive and innate in-group preference. She might never act on it, but the potential is always there.
Okay, yeah, if that last one is a real Tweet...that's Jewish. "I'm not Jewish, I'm just Jewish" is fucking retarded.
Yeah. It's amazing. Weird part is, I don't think she's being dishonest, in her own head. Which is why it gets so weird when people say they aren't Jewish. They have their own definition of what that means, and don't think they're lying. Wild.
But, yeah, I had ancestors who fled the Nazis, and I don't have any Jewish heritage. Which is why I was giving her the benefit of the doubt, having only seen the first one. Plenty of Germans fled the Nazis.
But, yeah...if you're Jewish...you're kinda Jewish. That really is wild. Do you happen to have an archive of that Tweet?
No, if he chose randomly and didn't reveal the car by pure chance then both doors remain equally likely
Yeah, I think I was wrong. I was thinking about it before I left for work, but didn't have time to edit. It's weird to think about, and still hard to completely grasp, but I do believe intent matters. It's just like how something crazy improbable can happen, and it doesn't affect the next result. You can flip 99 coins, and have them all turn up heads...you're already in the crazy universe, but the next flip is still a 50/50 chance.
So, you could have ten doors, and the host could randomly remove eight losers...the remaining two doors are still equally likely, you just got a really unlikely outcome...which I suppose means logically if not mathematically, you actually have more likelihood of the car being behind the already chosen door.
So, if the host chooses randomly, and you know that, I suppose you're actually better sticking with your choice. The more doors he reveals (again, if randomly, and you know it's random) without revealing the car, the more likely the car isn't in the doors that were unchosen.
Ugh. This gets more and more confusing, because you do have to know he's not choosing randomly, to be able to reach the "answer." If you don't know how he's choosing, it gets into more mind games than logic or math.
So I suppose I was a little hasty. I was still right that all those people on Twitter were retards and didn't even get the basics, but there were more assumptions you have to make than I took into account, initially. You have to know how the host is removing doors to be able to calculate whether or not you switch.
Well, we can't outright call for violence, but I think some people are definitely thinking it. But I agree with you, and that was kind of my point; anything that doesn't work toward saving your son, and might land you in jail, should not be attempted until, at the very least, you save your son. And if you do, you probably don't do the other stuff, because your son needs his father.
So, yeah, we're in complete agreement; saving the son comes first. If you can't...well, then I can see how you might resort to other actions. As the top comment in this chain implies, a man with nothing to lose is a dangerous prospect. If you no longer have the modulating influence or the goal of saving your son, some other options might seem more appealing in comparison.
Family comes first. Revenge, if you still have the chance to save your family, is counterproductive, and just means you're giving up on your family instead of helping them.
Yeah, she is. She once admitted she had Jewish heritage
I'm not sure. I forget that specific, but often this stuff gets pulled apart and blown out of proportion by that crowd, and becomes "fact" when it totally isn't. I've certainly seem questions floating around, but I think her "admittance" was taken out of context or something, as I recall. I've seen stuff like that happen a few times, and I wish the autists would give it a rest.
Lauren Southern has enough issues to criticize without potentially falsely labeling her Jewish.
...the 'Absolute' universe was created, allowing the writers at DC to offer up their imaginings of these characters.
Why on Earth would anyone want such a thing?
Instead of Batman being a rich billionaire who watched his parents get murdered, he's the lower-middle-class orphan...
So...not Batman.
Wonder Woman isn't a creation of clay raised on the utopian island of Themyscira anymore. In this universe, she was cursed by the gods and raised in Hell.
So...not Wonder Woman.
...Superman...In this version, the 'S' represents the members of Krypton's lower class, who suffered under the upper class which led to the destruction of the planet....this Superman is described as "a little bit of an outlaw and much more of an underdog..."
So...not Superman. Definitely not Superman.
Superman is back to his social justice roots...
Oh, fuck right off.
Jesus Christ!
That (both the still image and the video) is something straight out of a horror flick.
You can't trick me, Demon.
It really is a spiritual battle we're in. There are some creatures, such as this one, that just are wrong when you look at them. Whitmer and Hochel being some more off the top of my head, as well as some of those hedge fund people. I wish I could remember where, but I saw a picture of some CEO or something a week or two back, that just screamed "Demon."
It's crazy, too...because it comes through even in pictures. There is evil out there.