Not to mention the frankly incredible rates of disease.

It "seems" like I'm drawing an analogy between something that kills the host once it reaches critical mass in numbers, and so call immigrants. Who kill the host once they reach critical mass in numbers.

And it "seems" like that to several dozen other people who upvoted me because that's exactly what it is.

Are you unaware of the concept of a metaphor?

In the freezer, wrapped in butcher paper.

"this was not an act of terrorism".

A virus exists solely to propagate itself.

Same thing they always do then.

Oh my God he was S1? No wonder.

Native Texan.

Shamsud Din Jabbar. As Texas as Frito Pie.

[Edit: I don't know why that posted twice.

Native Texan.

Shamsud Din Jabbar. As Texas as Frito Pie.

Liberals then, not muslims like NO. Muslims actually know how to build a truck bomb.

Why? That's not hard to figure out.

It was the exact same reason as why aid workers were told to leave Trump voters to die. Because of who said it.

And moments after, an ugly black woman FBI agent with a nose ring and dreadlocks immediately proclaimed it to not be terrorism.

So we know exactly what it was.

I for one hope that the Film Actors Guild is totalled over this.

Only way they'll learn.

And I've heard a theory that dark matter is the interdimensional gravitic bleed through of a two dimensional fluidic substance. Doesn't mean a damn thing unless it's observable though.

No that literally is the reason.

They aren't like people. Talking to them isn't a dialogue, they're just imitating human speech to try and get what they want from you, and any agreement invariably ends up with importing more pajeets.

Hiring them for menial phone jobs is exactly how this happened.

I'd argue that the quality of drivers is as much an impact as any of those factors, if not moreso.

Funny enough this is a wonderful example of the kind of thing that the Interstate Commerce Clause is supposed to prevent.

If it were ever enforced honestly CA would have to abolish hundreds of state laws.

Well that's a somewhat larger kettle of fish, but yes. Economics is subtractive, but not a zero sim game and the two are often muddled.

Well yes it's silly but only because the greatest enhancement for human life in history is the semi automatic firearm.

Personal vehicles on the other hand are a distinct aspect of not just personal freedom but personal sovereignty. In much the same way that owning a weapon is.

If you are armed and you can go where you please, you aren't a subject, you're a citizen.

Liberals falsely claim that freedom is being free of burden. This is because their philosophy has its core in selfishness, jealousy, laziness and greed.

Freedom actually is being free from imposition. Possessing the means of defense, mobility and sufficiency.

I'll say the same thing I usually say to liberals.

If you really want to compare causes of death, we can...

More importantly nobody taught them that success is not the result of either luck or perfidy.

That's the foundation of economic leftism. The idea that if someone has more stuff than you do that they attained it illegitimately.

Which of course has it's roots in satanic ideology. All the founding ideas of leftism go back to the devil.

RE cities being badly designed... By them. They have been in control of the cities for more than half a century. They own that problem, so I wouldn't say it's something they are "right" about.

And honestly that's the case in a lot of other ways too.

Insurance is a mess? Yes it is. But insurance is a leftist contrivance that was devised by Roosevelt and his cabal of Bolsheviks. So that one gets hung around their necks too.

In just about every other regard I can think of, they either are the problem or are outright wrong about it.

That's just how it is when you're a dis-civilizational force founded on bad faith.

That isn't "the left" though, is the funny part.

It's Tik Tok, and that means it's China.