So, excuses aside, what you're telling me is that you didn't have children. Your dad had children, and your grandfather had children, and your great-grandfather had children, and your great-great grandfather had children. And it goes back that way for literally billions of years.

But you were the special retard who fucked it up. You fell down on the job and contributed to severing a bloodline.

You want to see the real race traitor? Look in the fucking mirror. You have ten million generations of ancestors who didn't fuck it up, only for you to be the first one to drop the ball.

The reason the white race is dying off isn't politics. It isn't Jew craftiness or an invasion of niggers. It's you. It's your failure.

Not a goal for me. Procreating like bug-people isn't how we win. Quality > quantity.

It's the only goal. Everyone who screeches about "white replacement" is missing the most simple and obvious fact of all: the white race is dying out because they're having less than 2.1 children each. By choice. They are choosing to have a non-replacement level of children. Which will mathematically extinct them.

How many kids do you have, CaptainTrouble?

Captain, it's your worldview that's twelve kinds of fucked-up. You're pointing your finger at a white person with three white kids and three white grandkids - one of the people who's actually achieved population replacement level, unlike most white people - and you're screeching that she's a demon because she doesn't want a military made up entirely of Nazi murderers.

Come on, man. Some part of you has to know how fucked up that is. No? None at all? You're just a lost cause?

IQ is basically the ability to play chess. It measures about six kinds of intelligence, and they're all the specific kinds of intelligence that make you better at chess. They don't make you more ethical; they don't make you a better parent; they don't make you better at maintaining friendships; they just make you better at chess.

If you add a bunch of 80 IQ people to a school of 100 IQ people, I guess the 100 IQ people benefit from getting to win at chess a little more often.

When anonymously polled, only about 8% of white people admit that they care about race. And these are the white people who have so little going for them that they can't point to a single accomplishment in their own lives, so they have to fall back on "My skin looks approximately as much like cum as Edison's, so I'm the master race." They aren't aware that Edison was a shyster who stole his best ideas from a Serb.

You're right; I can't read your mind. I'm sitting here wondering what your intentions are.

Do you want to protect your regulars just because they're the only regulars you've got, and for better or worse they feel like friends?

Do you care about gaming, even a little bit?

Are you completely on board with exterminating the Jews?

Do you just think that I post too often, and I'm too much of a presence lately, and you don't like disruption?

I cannot read your mind and I fully don't know what's going on with you.

Yeah, but when they simply make the case for genocide, while stopping just short of explicitly making the call to it, well then they're the regulars who you have to protect from anyone disagreeing with them.

Oh, you think my words are violence? Spoken like a true fourth-wave feminist.

Louise Arbour is dealing with a culture of disgrunted young white men who want to exterminate everyone who isn't them and who are being issued among the most lethal weapons in human history by the government. It's crazy dangerous. She wants to try to fix that by hiring a somewhat larger proportion of women and minorities.

And you're like "GET HER, SHE'S A DEMON."

So, yeah, that's why I call you a violent asshole.

Well, I care about games journalism. I still watch Second Wind and Fully Ramblomatic. I'm a very big Ben Croshaw fan.

I think games matter, and I think the choices game developers make are important.

This is what KiA became? Mods who say "Who gives a flying shit about games journalism"?

Can I ask you straight-up? Do you want this to be a forum whose topic is primarily the desire for the extermination of the Jews?

Yes, I've noticed. The definite culture here is that there have been eight "Crafty Jews control everything and we must exterminate them" posts a week and very little else.

Well, you're a mod. You gonna tell me that's the culture you're seeking? Was that everything you'd hoped for from KotakuInAction?

Look, if you're gonna straight-up tell me that this is a community exclusively for Jew-bashing and nothing else is welcome here, then go ahead and ban me; you're just telling me that GamerGate is over and all that's left is a handful of crazy antisemites who don't even play video games.

Well, Reddit doesn't agree that I belong there. I'm very, very banned over there. I'm on their defcon-3 ban list, where they ban me for saying hello.

But dude, if you want a forum where everyone agrees with you, why not specifically seek out a white-supremacist forum, instead of one that promotes itself as free speech? This one seems to be arguing that everyone is free to speak; if you want to live the live of a violent asshole without dissent, why not just find a forum that strictly limits itself to like-minded violent assholes?

Then I'll tell you why I want to post here.

2014 was an interesting year. I watched Sarkeesian. I agreed with about 55% of what she was saying and thought 45% was just bullshit that played to her crowd. I played Depression Quest before GamerGate even happened. I gave it a 6 on Metacritic. I said "Won't change your life, but it costs $2, and it's value for money, because it definitely wasn't something I've already played before, and creativity is good."

Then I got like 900 downvotes for my review of a two dollar game, and I was like what the living fuck is happening here.

I found the original KiA. I had plenty of spirited debates. I took the stance that it was okay to critique video games; it's the same thing Roger Ebert did for movies; it's ultimately just proof that we're looking at art.

Then I found out that I was about 60% wrong. The industry didn't stop at critique. It stripped games of everything edgy; it rejected the idea of the power fantasy as wrong; it fucking erased breasts from existence.

So I had to eat some crow. Except then, to my surprise, the original GamerGaters were saying they didn't even want tits and rape and slavery in their games. They were like: "I'm too old for that. I just don't want nigger or femoid protagonists and I don't want Joos in the industry."

Which, wow, that's been quite a turn, hasn't it. I can't help but feel like no one has managed to keep their eye on the ball. Like one segment of GamerGate got shamed into total compliance, while the other segment aren't even fucking gamers, they just want to kill the Joos and they took over the community.

It's - it's worth talking about, but of course people are gonna call me a faggot for talking about it, and if you're gonna ban me for calling them a faggot back, I don't know, I don't know you. I have no information. You probably shouldn't ban me for telling people calling me a faggot that they suck cocks. But maybe you will. Let's find out.

So what you're saying is that you think it's fine to live your life as a violent asshole because you think there are other violent assholes in the world, and as long as you're not the only one, that choice is just fine.

I see. So you think that anyone who isn't a violent asshole who wants to kill all the nonwhite people, hates white people.

Sure. I'm a gamer, I'm interested in where gaming's going, I don't like the direction it's taken over the last twelve years, I have plenty of thoughts on that.

Most of the people on the board are just contributing "I hate Joos," and you seem totally fine with that level of meaningfulness.

Louise Arbour's a French-Canadian Catholic. She's got three children and three grandchildren. I doubt she wants them all to burn for being white.

Maybe she's not "anti-white" so much as she's just not a white supremacist, eh?

Everyone here calls everyone they don't like a faggot and tells them to go suck dicks. The only way for there not to be rivalries is to ban anyone who doesn't gamely agree with everyone else.

That your bag, Shadow?

Petey's made about twelve references to my asshole and various dicks going into it. He gives as good as he gets. I wonder what makes you think it's necessary to step in and play Kindergarten teacher. Or at least some version of a Kindergarten teacher who resolves disputes by punching one kid in the face.

So, you're saying that a condition on speaking on KiA2 is that I be subservient to everyone and agree with the prevailing opinions?

Lol. "Demons." Your mammy sure taught you some dumb shit.

In reality all that's going to do is move the Overton window to the left. Game theory and history tells us you'll end up with a more left-wing Democratic party that appeals to 40% of the population; a centrist Labour party that appeals to 40% of the population; and an American Freedom party that appeals to 10% of the population. And the American Freedom party will have like five Congressmen and a Senator, and that will be the full extent of their power; and they'll dissolve a decade later when everyone realizes they can't actually get anything done.

You're contradicting yourself here, though. All of the things you describe as "mattering in life" (and though it pains me to leave a lion's eye unpoked, I won't start that argument) DO very, very strongly correlate to IQ. Look me in the eye and tell me seriously that acquired knowledge, pattern recognition, quantitative reasoning, and working memory aren't critical parts of making and keeping friends, or effective child resting, or good and ethical decision making, or good job performance, and I'll call you a liar.

You can certainly create edge cases where they matter. But for the most part, all those things are about consistency. Simple principles get them done - principles that a 70-IQ person can internalize just fine. "Keep the kid on a schedule and drive him to school." "Call your friends at least once a week." "Show up to work at 8:00, fed and rested and ready to go." That kind of thing.

It doesn't take any special intellectual skills to do that; and in fact, people with high IQs are often considerably worse at those things. They get too bored with schedules. They sleep through classes because they were up all night writing code. Their wife asks them if they and the kid ate dinner and they say "Oh, shit, I was distracted." Life is harder for them, as evidenced by the fact that high IQ is strongly positively correlated with alcoholism.

You and I may say "hush, brain, we no unga bunga today", but most people you meet are, in essence or in fact, still cavemen. This is ESPECIALLY true of low-IQ people, who often fundamentally lack the capability of rising above caveman brain.

This is one of the weirder racist arguments. Basically "I have evolved to a higher plane of consciousness than a nigger, and therefore I must behave exactly as a nigger does."

I'm no Christian, but one of my favorite Jesus quotes is "by your fruits you will know them." If two people act identically, who really gives a shit about the internal machinery? They're functionally the same person.

You can't seriously try to make the point that higher average IQs don't positively correlate to all the "things that matter" unless you're willing to argue that mudhuts and tribal warfare are just as conducive to these things that matter as highrises and indoor plumbing.

Sociological studies consistently show that the Amish are the happiest people in America. Highrises and freeways are nightmares, man. Cramming people in vertically is not a good way to work or live. Indoor plumbing is nice, but wells and outhouses are just fine, too.

Another fun fact: in colonial America, there are hundreds of reports of Europeans leaving their towns and going to live with the Natives, because it was simply a better way of life. There are almost no reports of the opposite happening.

At the time when the British Empire was most proud of its civilization, its air and water were literally poison. Hunger was endemic, people were dying of communicable disease, and life was so goddamn bleak that by the 18th century London's streets were littered with passed-out gin drinkers who would rather fucking drink themselves to death than have to live in that civilization.

Yeah, I think those high-IQ British engineers may have entirely missed the things that actually matter in life.

See, here's the thing. IQ tests are a pretty good measure of working memory, spatial reasoning, quantitative reasoning, acquired knowledge, and pattern recognition.

In other words, what IQ measures is basically: how good you can become at chess. All of these are chess skills. You could substitute ELO for IQ and you'd have a pretty tight correlation.

IQ, like ELO, is completely mute on whether you can competently raise children, show up on time to do your job, make ethical decisions, maintain friendships, create beautiful things - you know, everything that actually matters in life. It's pretty much just chess. You know what a high IQ got for Bobby Fischer? A lifetime of misery and ostracism, and it's hard to even argue that he put much good into the world.

Every group of people has an inherited tendency to be intensely, observably tribalistic. That's true whether we're talking about conservatives or metalheads or Buddhists or Guelphs or Polynesians.

If you're associating tribalism with primitivism: I agree. I think it's something that's important to rise past. To be able to recognize that your caveman brain is yelling "my tribe good, their tribe danger," and at the same time say to it "yeah, but you're not a caveman, are you."

Seems kind of silly to say "Hindus don't belong in America" and then vote for a candidate who most certainly believes that Hindus belong in America.

I guess his idea is that he can start a protest movement that will shrink the Republican party down to a white-racists-only party.

Which is a pretty dumb idea, considering that only 60% of Americans are white and only 13% of white Americans will even anonymously tell pollsters that race is important to them. Meaning that he wants to limit his "party of racial purity" to less than 8% of the American public.

Seems like he's got a surefire recipe for killing off the Republican party entirely... not that very many people take him seriously, of course.

Words aren't violence, but they can certainly announce it. "I am going to punch you in the face" are words that clearly demonstrate that you're a violent person and an enemy of peace. So are "People like you are going to be some of the first ones that need to be dealt with."

I'm not a legalist. There are hundreds of thousands of laws and rules that an American is subject to. Many are stupid. Many are deprecated. Some, the vast majority of lawyers and judges don't even know about.

With a system this stupid, my first priority isn't making sure all the rules are followed. You know what one of my first actual priorities is? Affordable food and a well-fed populace.