Well, Reddit doesn't agree that I belong there. I'm very, very banned over there. I'm on their defcon-3 ban list, where they ban me for saying hello.
But dude, if you want a forum where everyone agrees with you, why not specifically seek out a white-supremacist forum, instead of one that promotes itself as free speech? This one seems to be arguing that everyone is free to speak; if you want to live the live of a violent asshole without dissent, why not just find a forum that strictly limits itself to like-minded violent assholes?
You're the violent asshole btw. I never once insulted you but you started the personal insults. That's "violence". So, I don't know why you're trying to slander me for being a "violent asshole" when you're acting like one.
Oh, you think my words are violence? Spoken like a true fourth-wave feminist.
Louise Arbour is dealing with a culture of disgrunted young white men who want to exterminate everyone who isn't them and who are being issued among the most lethal weapons in human history by the government. It's crazy dangerous. She wants to try to fix that by hiring a somewhat larger proportion of women and minorities.
And you're like "GET HER, SHE'S A DEMON."
So, yeah, that's why I call you a violent asshole.
Seriously, more Straw Manning? Okay, now it's obviously deliberate. What a terrible way to argue. Do better.
No one's against White people? They teach that we're oppressors in school, they give our jobs away to non-Whites who are less competent, they tax us and give our tax money to non-Whites who are less deserving. They bring in nons and create an environment that promotes children for nons while creating a hostile anti-child environment for Whites. Their advertisements show nons having sex with White women and then White couples committing suicide or choosing not to have kids to save the environment. Our leaders call White people who promote the interests of Whites to be radical evil Nazis that need to be rid of.
And you tell me no one is against Whites? It's clear to me that you are against Whites also so even if no one else was (many people are) you would be.
I'm not even getting into incompatible genetics of non-Whites that create a structurally anti-White society by their mere existence yet either, especially in a democracy or society that caters to their preferences.
This whole society is anti-White to its core but at least you've created a few more ZOG Bots to spin the hamster wheel around for another generation. Good on you.
I very clearly meant that no one here is against white people. There's no need for me to defend white people on communities.win, because it's a bunch of Neo-Nazis, and what possible reason would white people need to be defended here?
But you're saying "they" are giving away "our" jobs? I've never had a problem finding a good job. What the fuck is your problem.
You're saying there's a hostile anti-child environment for "us"? It wasn't a problem for me to have a child. What the fuck is your poblem.
You're saying "they" are showing white people choosing not to have kids to save the environment? I had a kid. You didn't. What the fuck is your problem.
I'm not against whites; I made more whites. You - well, what the fuck is your problem.
If you add a bunch of 80 IQ people to a school of 100 IQ people, who benefits? The 80 IQs or the 100 IQ? Studies show there's a reversion to mean so intelligent students do worse being mixed with less intelligent people and less intelligent people do better being mixed with more intelligent people. This makes intuitive sense when you consider sports. Bad players mixed with good players stand to learn more to improve than good players mixed with bad players.
Now take the above and apply it to society as a whole.
Our society promotes anti-White policies at every level and then the White people react, appropriately, for the oppression they face and you call them violent extremists. The oppressors, our government and anti-White people, are the real problem not the White men reacting to the problem.
IQ is basically the ability to play chess. It measures about six kinds of intelligence, and they're all the specific kinds of intelligence that make you better at chess. They don't make you more ethical; they don't make you a better parent; they don't make you better at maintaining friendships; they just make you better at chess.
If you add a bunch of 80 IQ people to a school of 100 IQ people, I guess the 100 IQ people benefit from getting to win at chess a little more often.
When anonymously polled, only about 8% of white people admit that they care about race. And these are the white people who have so little going for them that they can't point to a single accomplishment in their own lives, so they have to fall back on "My skin looks approximately as much like cum as Edison's, so I'm the master race." They aren't aware that Edison was a shyster who stole his best ideas from a Serb.
Well, Reddit doesn't agree that I belong there. I'm very, very banned over there. I'm on their defcon-3 ban list, where they ban me for saying hello.
But dude, if you want a forum where everyone agrees with you, why not specifically seek out a white-supremacist forum, instead of one that promotes itself as free speech? This one seems to be arguing that everyone is free to speak; if you want to live the live of a violent asshole without dissent, why not just find a forum that strictly limits itself to like-minded violent assholes?
You're the violent asshole btw. I never once insulted you but you started the personal insults. That's "violence". So, I don't know why you're trying to slander me for being a "violent asshole" when you're acting like one.
Oh, you think my words are violence? Spoken like a true fourth-wave feminist.
Louise Arbour is dealing with a culture of disgrunted young white men who want to exterminate everyone who isn't them and who are being issued among the most lethal weapons in human history by the government. It's crazy dangerous. She wants to try to fix that by hiring a somewhat larger proportion of women and minorities.
And you're like "GET HER, SHE'S A DEMON."
So, yeah, that's why I call you a violent asshole.
Seriously, more Straw Manning? Okay, now it's obviously deliberate. What a terrible way to argue. Do better.
No one's against White people? They teach that we're oppressors in school, they give our jobs away to non-Whites who are less competent, they tax us and give our tax money to non-Whites who are less deserving. They bring in nons and create an environment that promotes children for nons while creating a hostile anti-child environment for Whites. Their advertisements show nons having sex with White women and then White couples committing suicide or choosing not to have kids to save the environment. Our leaders call White people who promote the interests of Whites to be radical evil Nazis that need to be rid of.
And you tell me no one is against Whites? It's clear to me that you are against Whites also so even if no one else was (many people are) you would be.
I'm not even getting into incompatible genetics of non-Whites that create a structurally anti-White society by their mere existence yet either, especially in a democracy or society that caters to their preferences.
This whole society is anti-White to its core but at least you've created a few more ZOG Bots to spin the hamster wheel around for another generation. Good on you.
I very clearly meant that no one here is against white people. There's no need for me to defend white people on communities.win, because it's a bunch of Neo-Nazis, and what possible reason would white people need to be defended here?
But you're saying "they" are giving away "our" jobs? I've never had a problem finding a good job. What the fuck is your problem.
You're saying there's a hostile anti-child environment for "us"? It wasn't a problem for me to have a child. What the fuck is your poblem.
You're saying "they" are showing white people choosing not to have kids to save the environment? I had a kid. You didn't. What the fuck is your problem.
I'm not against whites; I made more whites. You - well, what the fuck is your problem.
If you add a bunch of 80 IQ people to a school of 100 IQ people, who benefits? The 80 IQs or the 100 IQ? Studies show there's a reversion to mean so intelligent students do worse being mixed with less intelligent people and less intelligent people do better being mixed with more intelligent people. This makes intuitive sense when you consider sports. Bad players mixed with good players stand to learn more to improve than good players mixed with bad players.
Now take the above and apply it to society as a whole.
Our society promotes anti-White policies at every level and then the White people react, appropriately, for the oppression they face and you call them violent extremists. The oppressors, our government and anti-White people, are the real problem not the White men reacting to the problem.
IQ is basically the ability to play chess. It measures about six kinds of intelligence, and they're all the specific kinds of intelligence that make you better at chess. They don't make you more ethical; they don't make you a better parent; they don't make you better at maintaining friendships; they just make you better at chess.
If you add a bunch of 80 IQ people to a school of 100 IQ people, I guess the 100 IQ people benefit from getting to win at chess a little more often.
When anonymously polled, only about 8% of white people admit that they care about race. And these are the white people who have so little going for them that they can't point to a single accomplishment in their own lives, so they have to fall back on "My skin looks approximately as much like cum as Edison's, so I'm the master race." They aren't aware that Edison was a shyster who stole his best ideas from a Serb.