Seriously, more Straw Manning? Okay, now it's obviously deliberate. What a terrible way to argue. Do better.
No one's against White people? They teach that we're oppressors in school, they give our jobs away to non-Whites who are less competent, they tax us and give our tax money to non-Whites who are less deserving. They bring in nons and create an environment that promotes children for nons while creating a hostile anti-child environment for Whites. Their advertisements show nons having sex with White women and then White couples committing suicide or choosing not to have kids to save the environment. Our leaders call White people who promote the interests of Whites to be radical evil Nazis that need to be rid of.
And you tell me no one is against Whites? It's clear to me that you are against Whites also so even if no one else was (many people are) you would be.
I'm not even getting into incompatible genetics of non-Whites that create a structurally anti-White society by their mere existence yet either, especially in a democracy or society that caters to their preferences.
This whole society is anti-White to its core but at least you've created a few more ZOG Bots to spin the hamster wheel around for another generation. Good on you.
I very clearly meant that no one here is against white people. There's no need for me to defend white people on communities.win, because it's a bunch of Neo-Nazis, and what possible reason would white people need to be defended here?
But you're saying "they" are giving away "our" jobs? I've never had a problem finding a good job. What the fuck is your problem.
You're saying there's a hostile anti-child environment for "us"? It wasn't a problem for me to have a child. What the fuck is your poblem.
You're saying "they" are showing white people choosing not to have kids to save the environment? I had a kid. You didn't. What the fuck is your problem.
I'm not against whites; I made more whites. You - well, what the fuck is your problem.
But you're saying "they" are giving away "our" jobs? I've never had a problem finding a good job. What the fuck is your problem.
This is back to the roulette example I gave earlier. Just because so far you've never had a problem doesn't mean everyone else equally as capable as you is also not having problems. This is called a self-attribution bias. Just because you succeeded doesn't mean you're necessarily anymore special and thus deserving of the success. There is ample evidence of companies only hiring non-Whites or women over White men. TONS. Go read the front page of TheDonald from time-to-time, I feel they have new evidence to this effect like once a week. This is a problem that has been getting worse each year and really ramped up about 15 years ago. Many White people who had early career success can ride that out but many people's early careers were heavily gimped because of this.
To give you an anecdote, I went into investment banking at exactly the time all investment banking staff were pretty much men only but all had begun transitioning to bring in 50/50 women. All my peers would nonstop complain at every bank. Some pretty girl would get the red carpet treatment, do no work and the less and less White guys were forced to cover for all the work being done. A group of bankers at a smaller investment bank in town all quit for this reason (too many women and nons not doing enough work and the White men expected to pickup the slack). HR would sent out new hiring lists in a city that was like 70% White where 8/10 potential candidates were black and they'd call it the most diverse candidate selection ever. Diverse? 8/10 blacks in a city of 70% Whites? Uh huh... I lost out on a job paying $100k/yr more literally because the Hiring Manager wanted to hire a woman over me because she was the first woman on the team. She failed her case study for the interview process that I did acceptable on. That setback unfortunately cost me pretty much my whole career because it was my last opportunity for that role before I aged out.
And since I work in banking, I've seen all the Temporary Foreign Worker programs from the side of the businesses and it's fucking insane. There's no way domestic Canadians can compete against the government throwing money at businesses to hire foreigners. Yet, you'll deny this is going on?
Why do you sit there and deny this shit was/is going on? Why? Why deny this is going on when you're being told it is. By not accepting this is happening you are harming White people because you should be angry and outraged the government is doing this to White men but instead when White men react to the oppression the government imposes on them, you call them violent assholes.
I was a computer programmer. When the dot com bubbled popped, I became a paralegal. When my boss retired, I became a science writer.
You went into investment banking, which is a job that shuffles numbers around in the pursuit of more numbers, and generates no real worth. Every complaint posters have about Jews, they have about you.
Now you're a childless loser and the only thing you did in life was shuffle numbers around.
This isn't a social phenomenon. This isn't a conspiracy. This is just you being fucking bad at life. You never developed a moral philosophy, and you never did anything that meant anything. And now you spend your time stewing on the Internet saying "I hate people who don't look like me! I blame my whole wasted life on them!! Waaaahhh!!"
Reddit is too polite to point it out, and Neo-Nazi sites sympathize with you, but anyone with a brain can just see that: you played like shit, and you lost. Not your race, not your sex, you.
Okay, you can say "I lost" all you want but it doesn't change any of the previous facts regarding anti-White sentiment I've stated. You realize that, right? I can lose in an anti-White society (as expected) and I can lose in a pro-White society but at least if it was pro-White we can attribute the loss to me and not to the anti-White system.
I do consider myself a loser in terms of life and I won't deny that. For me to adequately live according to how I'd want to live, I'd need to earn about $300k/yr which I would have been on-track for if I got that one job I didn't get. Now, I make $150k/yr (not in Investment Banking). It's okay and by a lot of people's standards my education, career and lifestyle are things of envy by many others but not for me. This is what true equity is all about. To maximize happiness, one has to maximize equity (not leftist equity) but essentially getting what one deserves. Do I deserve what I currently have? I don't believe so and believe I deserve more because were it not for DEI, I would have more and that IMO is what I deserve not what I was given under a DEI structure. This inequity that is mostly applicable to White men leads to unhappiness in society and ironically the people who are unjustly elevated in place of the White men do not gain happiness enough to equal the loss of happiness from the White men's inequity. Instead, most people unjustly elevated gain a sense of entitlement and society as a whole (so the individuals, indirectly) actually end up worse-off for our society not properly allocating the most competent to the correct position.
I played my best hand because I knew given the kind of person I am, I could only be happy at about $300k/yr so I think I went into the best thing for that given my strengths/weaknesses. I would have went into engineering if I could have done it all over again though, oh well.
Still, just because I haven't met my own standards doesn't mean anything I say regarding race or the structure of society is false, keep that in mind.
Seriously, more Straw Manning? Okay, now it's obviously deliberate. What a terrible way to argue. Do better.
No one's against White people? They teach that we're oppressors in school, they give our jobs away to non-Whites who are less competent, they tax us and give our tax money to non-Whites who are less deserving. They bring in nons and create an environment that promotes children for nons while creating a hostile anti-child environment for Whites. Their advertisements show nons having sex with White women and then White couples committing suicide or choosing not to have kids to save the environment. Our leaders call White people who promote the interests of Whites to be radical evil Nazis that need to be rid of.
And you tell me no one is against Whites? It's clear to me that you are against Whites also so even if no one else was (many people are) you would be.
I'm not even getting into incompatible genetics of non-Whites that create a structurally anti-White society by their mere existence yet either, especially in a democracy or society that caters to their preferences.
This whole society is anti-White to its core but at least you've created a few more ZOG Bots to spin the hamster wheel around for another generation. Good on you.
I very clearly meant that no one here is against white people. There's no need for me to defend white people on communities.win, because it's a bunch of Neo-Nazis, and what possible reason would white people need to be defended here?
But you're saying "they" are giving away "our" jobs? I've never had a problem finding a good job. What the fuck is your problem.
You're saying there's a hostile anti-child environment for "us"? It wasn't a problem for me to have a child. What the fuck is your poblem.
You're saying "they" are showing white people choosing not to have kids to save the environment? I had a kid. You didn't. What the fuck is your problem.
I'm not against whites; I made more whites. You - well, what the fuck is your problem.
This is back to the roulette example I gave earlier. Just because so far you've never had a problem doesn't mean everyone else equally as capable as you is also not having problems. This is called a self-attribution bias. Just because you succeeded doesn't mean you're necessarily anymore special and thus deserving of the success. There is ample evidence of companies only hiring non-Whites or women over White men. TONS. Go read the front page of TheDonald from time-to-time, I feel they have new evidence to this effect like once a week. This is a problem that has been getting worse each year and really ramped up about 15 years ago. Many White people who had early career success can ride that out but many people's early careers were heavily gimped because of this.
To give you an anecdote, I went into investment banking at exactly the time all investment banking staff were pretty much men only but all had begun transitioning to bring in 50/50 women. All my peers would nonstop complain at every bank. Some pretty girl would get the red carpet treatment, do no work and the less and less White guys were forced to cover for all the work being done. A group of bankers at a smaller investment bank in town all quit for this reason (too many women and nons not doing enough work and the White men expected to pickup the slack). HR would sent out new hiring lists in a city that was like 70% White where 8/10 potential candidates were black and they'd call it the most diverse candidate selection ever. Diverse? 8/10 blacks in a city of 70% Whites? Uh huh... I lost out on a job paying $100k/yr more literally because the Hiring Manager wanted to hire a woman over me because she was the first woman on the team. She failed her case study for the interview process that I did acceptable on. That setback unfortunately cost me pretty much my whole career because it was my last opportunity for that role before I aged out.
And since I work in banking, I've seen all the Temporary Foreign Worker programs from the side of the businesses and it's fucking insane. There's no way domestic Canadians can compete against the government throwing money at businesses to hire foreigners. Yet, you'll deny this is going on?
Why do you sit there and deny this shit was/is going on? Why? Why deny this is going on when you're being told it is. By not accepting this is happening you are harming White people because you should be angry and outraged the government is doing this to White men but instead when White men react to the oppression the government imposes on them, you call them violent assholes.
I was a computer programmer. When the dot com bubbled popped, I became a paralegal. When my boss retired, I became a science writer.
You went into investment banking, which is a job that shuffles numbers around in the pursuit of more numbers, and generates no real worth. Every complaint posters have about Jews, they have about you.
Now you're a childless loser and the only thing you did in life was shuffle numbers around.
This isn't a social phenomenon. This isn't a conspiracy. This is just you being fucking bad at life. You never developed a moral philosophy, and you never did anything that meant anything. And now you spend your time stewing on the Internet saying "I hate people who don't look like me! I blame my whole wasted life on them!! Waaaahhh!!"
Reddit is too polite to point it out, and Neo-Nazi sites sympathize with you, but anyone with a brain can just see that: you played like shit, and you lost. Not your race, not your sex, you.
Okay, you can say "I lost" all you want but it doesn't change any of the previous facts regarding anti-White sentiment I've stated. You realize that, right? I can lose in an anti-White society (as expected) and I can lose in a pro-White society but at least if it was pro-White we can attribute the loss to me and not to the anti-White system.
I do consider myself a loser in terms of life and I won't deny that. For me to adequately live according to how I'd want to live, I'd need to earn about $300k/yr which I would have been on-track for if I got that one job I didn't get. Now, I make $150k/yr (not in Investment Banking). It's okay and by a lot of people's standards my education, career and lifestyle are things of envy by many others but not for me. This is what true equity is all about. To maximize happiness, one has to maximize equity (not leftist equity) but essentially getting what one deserves. Do I deserve what I currently have? I don't believe so and believe I deserve more because were it not for DEI, I would have more and that IMO is what I deserve not what I was given under a DEI structure. This inequity that is mostly applicable to White men leads to unhappiness in society and ironically the people who are unjustly elevated in place of the White men do not gain happiness enough to equal the loss of happiness from the White men's inequity. Instead, most people unjustly elevated gain a sense of entitlement and society as a whole (so the individuals, indirectly) actually end up worse-off for our society not properly allocating the most competent to the correct position.
I played my best hand because I knew given the kind of person I am, I could only be happy at about $300k/yr so I think I went into the best thing for that given my strengths/weaknesses. I would have went into engineering if I could have done it all over again though, oh well.
Still, just because I haven't met my own standards doesn't mean anything I say regarding race or the structure of society is false, keep that in mind.