That's only because the Labour party used trade-unionism as a weapon to create a Socialist state. It was a lie then, it is a lie now.
Britain has been a Socialist country for decades. All Thatcher managed to do is copy the Chinese Model of Communism and set up a couple "Fee Economic Zones".
Britain must be liberated.
I hadn't heard that story, but I also hadn't studied inter-war France that well. To the credit of the Socialist government, Fascism partially has an origin in France as well as Spain and Italy. So, it should be interesting to see the interplay in that period.
What I do know about the French Army of the time is that the logistical situation was so dire small famines actually broke out pre-war on the line.
What is more shocking is that the British were blindsided by this rather than the idea that the French army would collapse under such circumstances.
Normalcy bias. "It's just the French being French"
The fact that young people are the ones calling for censorship and authoritarianism is the thing that's throwing us all off.
The Left literally spent decades using the revolutionary youth to attack traditional structures, but once it became clear that they took over institutions, they then taught the youth to attack both young and old who were statists. Fundamentally the destroyed so many young people, and so many families, that they want the state to be their mommy and daddy. Even millennials grew up in a way where if we saw someone our age saying, "I DON'T FEEL SAFE" we'd laugh at them and call them a faggot.
Now, those people who did that are in charge of entire social, political, and economic structures; and have acquired the power of the gun. They basically combined with the statist crazy cat ladies who need the government to be their husband, and minorities to be their children. That's what happened with the Lockdowns during Covid.
We have this weird situation where a bunch of the young people thought 'risky behavior' was going on Reddit without their safety teddy bear. Then the government gave them a gun and told them to do whatever they felt like.
This is why I kind of hate millennials more than any generation.
They actually grew up in a really shit environment that had a small window of "not shit" that was the late 80's and early 90's. Yet instead of rising to the occasion and re-building what they had (which is literally us going "I just wanted to play video games"), they fell to the environment and became the most wild-eyed, psychotic, hyper-ideological, lunatic generation the country has ever seen. They became: "IF YOU DON'T WANT ME TO CUT YOUR KIDS DICK OFF, YOU'RE A NAZI AND I'LL KILL YOU". The millennials are where everything split. They either figured out that something went wrong, or they quadrupled down on the crazy. Gen Z and Gen Alpha are not split like this, and kinda just understand the millennials are not to be trusted.
Yes, their stay in the US is mostly for the lag time that it takes to get them back. Weirdly, this can take 6 months to a year due to judiciary and bureaucratic nonsense.
I remember because MSNBC did a story about "unaccompanied minors being exiled by the Trump administration after separating them from their parents". It was actually about how a mom stole a kid from her husband and fled to the US. She was arrested, the kid was sent to an immigration facility. The family court of the host country was called, and they sorted out the domestic situation. The US government then bought the kid a plane ticket on a specially designated flight that would fly back into the host country where the grand-parents would be waiting to pick the kid up.
MSNBC reported on all of this, assuming their readers are illiterate and would get bored by the 3rd paragraph, and just spent most of the early part of the article reporting how the mother "didn't know where her kid would end up" despite the grandparents being required to pick the kid up from the airport.
Yes, but that process can take place in either jurisdiction once it is established.
Yes, absolutely. The only issue is that immigration cases with children can still be stupid, so you never know if the host country is going to demand the children back, or refuse to take them.
If they don't have any guardians, you basically just need to keep them in child-designated immigration holding facilities. These were the ones where AOC was claiming they were "jails" and that "children drank out of the toilets" because the toilets had a built in sink feature for washing hands. They are a bit spartan, but the staff do keep the kids safe, there are recreational centers, and there's plenty of food. Not the greatest place for boy or girl to hang out, but it's a safe & protective environment. They shouldn't need to be moved around at all once there.
I can give you a few possible scenarios.
- Kids either runaway across the border with no documents
- Kids' parents die or are imprisoned upon crossing the border
- Kids are rescued from slavery upon crossing the border.
In these cases, which do happen, the kids have to be interviewed to find their identity and home country. Upon figuring that out, the host country needs to be contacted, and their judicial system will get involved, and have to contact the original parents. Those parents will have to be investigated by the host country to make sure that it is safe for the children to be returned to their parents or appointed legal guardians. This is actually a horrifically stupid legal bureaucracy involving the laws of at least two nations, and possibly international laws and treaties. There does need to be a process in this case.
BUT, you'll notice that in all of these cases, the kids are returned to their host country.
Now, can I give you an example where kids are NOT?
There's only one I can think of: the extended family already lives in the US, the kids fled their host country, and host country parents/guardians are either dead or unfit to care for children.
So for example, grandma lives in the US, but mom and dad live in Mexico, but dad's a career criminal, and mom got shot to death by one of dad's rival gang members. So little jimmy feared that him and his sister would be killed next and decided to literally claw their way to grandma to be safe. In this case, the US authorities would have to recognize that the kids were in genuine danger, that neither parent could get the children, and now these kids are trying to go live with their grandma in the states. This is a catastrophe from a bureaucracy stand-point because not only is immigration law and foreign treaties involved, but now family courts in both countries are involved, and so is CPS. Now, if Grandma is willing to accept them, given the severity of the situation, the kids might be considered genuine refugees and non-residents that now have to live with grandma, if and only if the host country family court and US family court can agree on transferring the custody of the kids to grandma.
That being said, the likelihood of this happening even 100 times in a year is vanishingly small.
It should be pointed out that immigration services have lost hundreds of children. This doesn't necessarily mean these kids are dead or enslaved, many are likely just being moved from family member to family member in the US via these NGO's that didn't take good accounting of people.
I prefer 6 and 2, above the others... and 1 & 3 get special considerations from me such that even if they are not great, I like them anyway. 4 and 5 have good moments but I don't typically need to watch them.
4 will always have some of the funniest moments, and "Transparent Aluminum" which is still being worked on. "Hello Computer" still gets me.
5 will always have "Excuse me... What does God need with a starship?"
I'm not being dishonest at all. Jews are a religious group that contains multi-ethnic components.
Put it like this, what would happen if there was no Judaism. Would the jews remain an "ethnic group"?
Well, considering their culture, language, economic ties, traditions, values, and even breeding/marriage rites are determined solely by their religion, they couldn't continue to have any ethnos. The Persians have ethnos exist regardless of whether or not they are Muslim, Christian, Jewish, or Zoroastrian. This can not be the case with Jews. Without Judaism, they are simply not Jews and there would be nothing to bind them. Jews in Western Europe, Eastern Europe, Russia, Africa, and the Middle East would simply meld into the rest of the populations in those areas, and be at best fully segregated ethnic groups unrelated to other formerly "jewish" ethnos.
So, no. Jews can't remain an "ethnic group" without Judaism, because they aren't an ethnic group to begin with. They are tied by religion.
But it's still there, and you shouldn't be surprised to see those numbers among most Europeans, that's the point. You're not gonna find anyone even close to a full blooded Aryan because the entire ethnic group was bred out before writing existed in Europe. And certainly no one from Western Europe would be Aryan, because the Aryans originate in Eastern Europe, and migrated south-east.
If you're in Western Europe, you're probably more related to the Huns than the Aryans.
Very much so. It helped that he criticized Hitler before he was forced to suicide, and he was never a dedicated National Socialist. Just a highly ambitious, and excellent armored commander. He was significantly more competent than most of his peers.
One of the reasons that France fell so quickly in 1940 was because some of the finest corps commanders ever produced from Germany were all simultaneously on the front line before anyone actually understood how good they were. In an unfortunate inverse, no one among the allies realized how poor French command, equipment, and training had actually gotten. It didn't help that the most elite units, tanks, generals and troops that Germany had, attacked French reservists with little training and little anti-tank equipment.
Correct. Years ago the Trans activists tried claiming that you don't need gender dysphoria to be trans, showing that they were pushing nothing legitimate. Now we are managing castrate children because they are depressed or alienated, as if that would help them.
Whether it's castrating girls with body issues, or young gay men, the solution isn't mutilation.
Weird, it's as if doing permanent chemical damage to children that castrates them might not help a mental disorder.
Crazy.
Wait about a decade, see how high the suicide rate gets from fucking savages like these. We are honestly living through our version of lobotomies and thalidomide.
Actually yes, mostly white people control the media.
It's also mostly white people that don't have a problem with this, and vote to get in prosecutors that release criminals. You might as well just yell, "show me one white person in Antifa, I'll wait!"