Don't forget there's our lovely friends in the 'alt-right' who are cheering for him to be imprisoned here. Better off supporting the Grooming Gangs and their full-throated institutional support than something something he must be a jew because I don't like him something something.
The Communists don't want voting at all.
You're not dealing with progressives, but real life fucking tankies.
And it's clear to me that there are Communist fire-bombers coming out of Portland. From the 2020 Riots (where Black National Socialists and White Communists established their own Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact, engaged in multiple acts of secession, firebombing federal buildings, and many other businesses), to the Canadian Catholic Church Red Terror campaign where many churches and community centers were fire-bombed, to the mass arson-lit-wild-fires across Oregon, it very much seems that firebombing is becoming a favorite past time of the political left.
The Communists hate Trump and see Kamala Harris as a Neo-Con genocider that hates Muslims. They don't anyone to vote.
This needs to be called what it very clearly is: Communist Terrorism.
The "rainbow flag" is gay nationalism the same way a 'black nationalist' uses a black fist.
It is intersectional nationalism; where states are not made up of multiple ethnos that form a nation, but identity categories that form an intersectional nation. What makes it Democratic is that the state is the intersectional nation. The people are the state and the state are the people.
This is true. The obsession with middle-class suburban white women is projection of where the Left is pining their hopes (and who has the most influence in their intelligentsia). In reality, Trump is exploiting 'mom energy' with issues relating to girl's safety, indoctrination in schools, parental rights, and the like.
He's making shocking gains with black women. Basically moving from 5% to 10% or more. He was predicted to have 0% back in 2020.
I totally agree, but I do worry about the harpies. That's a thing we don't have an answer for because we've never seen this many resentful, childless, cat ladies. They are not going to get any less crazy because they are effectively the result of not getting married and having kids. We are going to have a fucking horde of bitter, angry, resentful, childless cat-ladies, who are all politically radical, and will remain so for decades.
The unlikable childless cat-ladies in their 40's now will live on for another 40 years, and probably spend most of that time screaming about Trump's America. They are never going to be married or have kids, so the only outcome is that they get an elderly marriage to (let's face it) low status men whom they will resent because they assume they are better than them, or they will become more vengeful and vicious, trying to corrupt the youth even harder because if they can't have kids, nobody can.
I can't figure out from a societal level what to do with this horde of Left-over women. And forget any stupid fedposting arguments because I don't think there's a single human civilization in history that would tolerate such a thing.
Hard disagree. Men just need to not compromise on their values and women will come along. We basically have to live out Shakespeare's "Taming Of The Shrew".
First, because women basically do give up their agency in values to their husbands. We literally see it, and it's one of the reasons why married women are much more to the right than unmarried women are.
Second, because so long as men don't compromise their values (which they shouldn't be for a woman anyway), attractive women will start espousing the values of attractive men; and then less attractive, single, women will follow the lead of more attractive women.
It's a completely solvable problem that has to be resolved by men.
I suppose this also goes to show the full-blown hyper-reality the media was constructing to deny the existence of real life. They'll push a story to pressure more hospital funding, and fully ignore that the lockdowns had anything to do with these deaths.
Same thing with the hundreds of thousands of people who died during the period of 3 years where no medical institution on Earth understood the difference between "of" and "with" Covid. It's no surprise to me that there are a handful of people that didn't think Covid existed when the level of lies is this bad.
How do you claim a pandemic is even happening when the deaths are only slightly larger than annual flu deaths (which are now zero for no reason), no one can confirm whether deaths are from covid or with covid, and the field testing that most people use to diagnose themselves has a false positive rate of between 30-50%. Unless you are a kiwi, in which case the kiwi has a 100% false positive rate.
Now, Covid did exist, but it is alarming that the global media created a hyper-reality and supported mass psychosis. These are crimes against humanity.
I think as I said to AccountWasFree, I never experienced that period of online gaming. Only early "online" gaming, and then match-making. I think for a while I was purchasing older games which were cheaper, and in addition to not knowing anyone who played the game (let alone had a server), 3-4 servers is about all I would find running if I cared to go looking.
I didn't ignore it, as much as I simply didn't experience it. What I'm relaying is effectively my own experience. Due to the difficulty of online gaming, I just typically played single player games until match-making actually became a real thing. Not with COD2, but with Halo CE.
I wasnt speaking in the case of that tribe specifically, and I would argue it continues only because they dont really have any solid contact with outsiders that test their way of life through direct means like you would have seen among tribes on continental masses (where constant fighting means only the strong survive).
I don't buy that either. The practice of burning widows in India was continued until the British put a stop to it, but the Indus Valley had a long running civilization with lots of contact. They Maya ate their disobedient vassals. The Assyrians robbed everyone who had any contact with with them, every year, for 4000 years. Now their traditions solved problems as follows: the Indus valley avoided inheritance battles, the Mayans ensured loyalty through terror, and the Assyrians were the only full-scale civilization that existed at the time.
You have to realize that Traditionalism isn't a moral mechanism. Sometimes the problem being solved by tradition is: "How do we support our pedophile leadership?" or "How do we terrorize our vassals into obedience to avoid rebellion?" Traditionalism has no reason to produce a moral answer, just an old one. The question may not even be formed to the benefit of the society, but it's elite. The value of questioning and challenging tradition is to spot those flaws where a tradition is inapplicable, useless, antiquated, or counter-productive. Traditionalism actually has no way of pruning itself of bad ideas once they take root as a tradition, because abandoning the tradition (even if it was for a good reason) is rejected out of hand because it "solves a problem".
Well, to be honest. Battletoads and TNMT were horrifically designed games for difficulty curve. I think they may have originally been meant as Arcade games, but that monetization strategy doesn't work for a home console.
Jeff.
That was your choice.
Don't start complaining now that you're loosing.