8
Gazerbeam 8 points ago +9 / -1

"Joined" is not the same as "founded". She was one of the College Idiots for Palestine, and that is the network that she tapped to protect her reputation when people disagreed with her on the internet a decade later.

2
Gazerbeam 2 points ago +2 / -0

No, the best we got was /pol/ saying "it's the Jews." That has additional meanings to anyone who knows history. Even that leaves out the other factions involved and their motivations.

5
Gazerbeam 5 points ago +5 / -0

"Trump won because of Gamergate" is a good thing. We caught a Russian spy ring trying to penetrate DARPA. The "Russians" were actually a Saudi sponsored Hamas spy ring that was using Russian slogans and on the Russian payroll. There are enough Russian agents embedded everywhere in the US government that this opens doors for them, and the big PR agencies were taking jobs from Russia and giving them to Hamas. The PR agencies used Chinese spies to cover it up and then took money from China (and gave it to Hamas).

It really was the Rothschilds, Israelis, and America's Jewish leaders running the big Russia-to-Hamas money laundry. Apparently on orders from communists and Islamists inside the CIA.

-4
Gazerbeam -4 points ago +3 / -7

They are Hamas! Stop laughing and do some research!

-9
Gazerbeam -9 points ago +2 / -11

people deserve to know what the person they are arguing with believes.

I not only believe it, I have proven it. Read the links and follow up with your own digging.

-10
Gazerbeam -10 points ago +4 / -14

They're activities are contained in the Middle East

Have you been under a rock?

Hamas has been running the United States government. The Social Justice Warriors are Hamas. Anti-Gamergate censoring the Internet is Hamas. Antifa is Hamas. "The Jews" are evil because they are sponsoring Hamas (on orders from the CIA). The Homos For Hamas are, obviously, Hamas. Hamas is not contained, they are everywhere.

2
Gazerbeam 2 points ago +2 / -0

He's a Microsoft employee too, so it's hard for me to not see this as pulling "Embrace, Extend, Extinguish" on the open source community by injecting it with radical leftist politics which are incompatible with an environment of meritocracy.

That reminds me of when anons found Apigee, a Microsoft spinoff.

  • Sam Ramji - "As Microsoft's senior director of platform strategy, his job is a big one: overseeing the company's initiatives in Linux and open source."
  • Bryan Kirschner - Microsoft's Director of Open Source Strategy from 1999-2009
  • Shanley Kane was the company's head of developer relation

Crunchbase says that the company only had fourteen employees. Those are three of them. Anons were too distracted by the CEO's relationship with a guy named Dick Dong Wang to do any further research.

2
Gazerbeam 2 points ago +2 / -0

What is surprising is that the vast majority of the protesters sided with the crazies who were inserted into the movement to destroy it. They accepted them as leaders, and that is what they believe now. None of the organizers who were kicked out could manage to continue organizing.

4
Gazerbeam 4 points ago +4 / -0

My local Five Guys had free peanuts that were pretty good, and the fries were decent. The burger was skippable. Thin and overcooked. I like meaty juicy burgers.

7
Gazerbeam 7 points ago +7 / -0

None of these supposed former champions of freedom on the left ever were anything of the sort. They were just trying to get a foot in the door.

It was surprising to be very loudly told to fuck off by one of the people who got the Halloween Papers out, one of the Deep Capture authors, several national security bloggers who used to write about the Muslim Brotherhood, everyone else who used to hate Microsoft and might have been interested in a scandal where Microsoft played a central role, and the entire "Free Speech Movement" which is now endorsing the worst censorship. And the central command of this global Internet censorship is, of all people, the Electronic Frontier Foundation.

Another central command is the Rockefeller Brothers Fund. The Rockefellers ran the commission that exposed the CIA's crimes in the 1970s. This made them heroes to the anti-government left. They did not actually want to stop the CIA's crimes. They wanted the power of the CIA for themselves. They took it and used it against political competition to their monopolism.

The actual honest anti-government left are the people who were consistently anti-Clinton, anti-Bush, anti-Obama, and anti-whatever this Current Year bullshit is. It is a small number of people who have all been smeared as Right Wing Conspiracy Theorists.

-5
Gazerbeam -5 points ago +2 / -7

there is no word from Jewish organizations.

The Jewish organizations are completely cucked. All of them support Hamas.

4
Gazerbeam 4 points ago +4 / -0

Her husband works for the company that manages the Prince's Trust of King Charles.

2
Gazerbeam 2 points ago +2 / -0

None of these names are on my radar. There might be another Austin Private Wealth, or it could have been a coincidence.

13
Gazerbeam 13 points ago +13 / -0

Deep state assassination attempt or lone wolf?

The deep state creates lone wolves by saying "love this" / "hate this enough to kill it" on all channels until someone does. They do have a very large organization with a chain of command but they prefer to not get caught, so they use the media to incite other people to take action.

8
Gazerbeam 8 points ago +8 / -0

You're telling a story, that story has a main character,

DQ3 is one game where that is not really the case. All of the party members are replaceable character classes with no story other than one point that requires you to give away a merchant. The MQ goes through a story but has no characterization other than being "the child of Ortega" which barely matters. Other than that, the game is just a series of local subquests that anyone could go through. There was even a bug that allowed you to get rid of the MQ if I remember correctly.

The player could choose the MQ to be a boy or a girl. It changes the sprite and some dialogue, and that's it. Taking that out? Well, it's annoying. It's the loss of a feature. Taking it out to appease Current Year stupidity, which it looks like they're doing, is retarded.

view more: Next ›