Psychonaut.Wiki is a lot more professional and formalised. But Erowid has some very useful information especially when it comes to drug interactions.
Th.e problem I had with the new Punisher was the faggot who played him (From Early Walking Dead) was a big anti-GG
Seems like a nice Picador opportunity.
harsh......but fair
Skynet looms large
I think it refers more to the combinatorial factors of increased individuals. Think of it as when you're by yourself you have a limited range of experiences. Add another person and all of a sudden you can do a lot more novel things. Add 100 people and the novelty increases exponentially. Add 6 billion people using AI and it goes off the chart.
It's my thoughts, but I had bingAI edit it
We prefer Psychonaut. Come and join us at Erowid
I was in the Beta for a couple of weeks but got bored
tl;dr...summary?
You have to inject the drug before the heart stops
His motive wasn't to kill anyone, he just wanted to be put in prison in France so he wasn't deported. Shows you how the system is fucked
I think it's only about 20% - but unfortunately they're the ones controlling the narrative. If yuo look at polls and comments - there's far more of us sane people out there than they pretend
The Vicarious Victimhood card - add that to the deck
I'm looking forward to Zach Galafanikis' new show "Between Two Frens".
I meant as opposed to standard 2x45min 11 aside
I don't think this was specifically for it - but you can bet the some footage will make season 3. I think it's too late to be on Season 2 now
It's part of the 7-a-side format tournament. They have other non-standard rues as well like no offsides
Lindsay Harris was best for her team and she let 12 goals in. But must have saved another 20. The defense was just no match for the body strength of the men. Any honest observer will note that the Womens FIFA team of the year - i.e the best women in the world, wouldn't win a single game in the EPL.
THey play 'target goal' - which means after the 40 minutes they play until one team reaches the target. In this case since the score was 11-0 at the end the target is 12 goals. This means theoretically the opponent could score 12 goals and win - but normally its a golden goal for the higher scoring team as in this case.
I asked Mr AI his thoughts - That is a very interesting and controversial question. There is no definitive answer, as different people may have different opinions and perspectives on the role and responsibility of IMDB as a movie rating platform. However, I will try to provide some possible arguments for and against IMDB's manipulation of ratings.
Some possible arguments for IMDB's manipulation of ratings are:
- IMDB is a private company that owns and operates its own website, and therefore has the right to decide how to display and curate its content, including ratings. It is not obligated to follow any external standards or criteria for rating movies, as long as it does not violate any laws or regulations.
- IMDB may have a legitimate reason to adjust ratings for certain movies, such as correcting for bots, trolls, or other malicious actors who may try to artificially inflate or deflate ratings for their own agenda. IMDB may also want to prevent rating manipulation by other parties, such as studios, producers, or marketers who may have a vested interest in the success or failure of a movie.
- IMDB may have a social or ethical responsibility to promote movies that have positive messages, values, or representation, especially for marginalized or underrepresented groups. By manipulating ratings, IMDB may be able to influence public opinion and awareness of certain issues or causes, and encourage more diversity and inclusion in the movie industry and society.
Some possible arguments against IMDB's manipulation of ratings are:
- IMDB is a trusted and popular source of information and opinion for millions of movie fans and consumers around the world. By manipulating ratings, IMDB is betraying the trust and expectations of its users, who rely on IMDB to provide accurate and unbiased ratings that reflect the genuine views and experiences of other moviegoers.
- IMDB is abusing its power and influence as a dominant movie rating platform, and undermining the integrity and credibility of its own system. By manipulating ratings, IMDB is distorting the reality and quality of movies, and potentially deceiving or misleading its users into watching or avoiding certain movies based on false or biased information.
- IMDB is imposing its own agenda and ideology on its users, and violating their freedom of choice and expression. By manipulating ratings, IMDB is effectively censoring or silencing the voices and opinions of its users who may disagree with or challenge IMDB's preferences or values. IMDB is also disrespecting the artistic vision and merit of filmmakers who may have different perspectives or intentions than IMDB.
What do you think? Do you agree or disagree with any of these arguments? Why or why not? 😊
I know someone who says it's the best series in fantasy. I've read I think about 5 of the books and I liked them but haven't bothered to seek out the unread books. If you have easy access to the books I'd definitely give them a go.
And nothing will happen