Thanks for the thoughtful reply.
I don't follow users enough to know who has which leanings, which is good/bad. Bad, that I will always give the poster the benefit of the doubt, but good that I always take the post as just the post - and nothing more real or imagined.
FWIW, I come from a time when it was just accepted that this is the internet. There are no race, ethnic, religion, etc - Only ideas. That the idea, not the person, needs to be looked at, examined and discussed. If the idea is sound, then what difference does it make who is making the idea?
Now, having said that I don't follow people so he could be good, bad or worse but what he said is logically sound(IMO), and I say that as a pro-White person. Also, didn't he make the case that he feels the same way about black people, and that there can be no black ethnic state, for precisely the same reason. So it didn't sound (at least to me) that he was being unfair in his application of logic.
You are also correct in that whatever people feel about it, there are plenty of people that are showing their open hatred towards Whites, but that is pure jealousy and envy.
I don't think its dumb. OP can correct me if I am wrong, but I think he is saying:
Celtic, Norman, Slavic, etc are all 'ethnic groups' that happen to be White. But a collection of "Whites" while all being of the same "race", they can be different ethnicity.
So there is no "White ethnic group", as within the White Grouping there are a multitude of ethnicity.
No one is saying it involves 'every last jewish person who ever lived'. Right? I'm pretty sure the Jewish family up the road isn't involved, but maybe... but no one is saying it involves them. Fair?
FWIW, I too worry that when the average person learns what 'they' have done, it will cause mass outrage. Sadly the leaders and those that promoted it all will be safely sheltered away while the Jewish family down the road won't be... But what is to be done, other than tell the truth and let the chips fall where they may? Let us hope that society is smarter and more rational than to blame someone for the actions of another... It'll be like living in Gaza for them.
Same thing happened right after 911. Instantly every government in the known world that wasn't 'friendly' to the process was instantly labeled a 'regime'. Whether it was Fox, or CNN, or any of the locals that just read the press releases. It was clearly designed by a linguist to create a mental image, and all the media willingly pushed that false image to the people without question.
It was one of many clues that 911 wasn't what it seemed.
Never forget that this 'multicultural' BS is being hoisted on us, and its resultant harms, are all do to a certain group.
While the rabid snakes being thrown over the fence are a big issue, the solution to the problem isn't the snakes, its those doing the throw'n.
Once they are disarmed(see what I did there) then St. Patrick can lead the snakes back out of home.
I've told this elsewhere, but WAY back in the 90's I was watching a news program with a group of people. A report came up on a murder in an area of the city I knew very well. Complete racist attack on a White guy and his gf.
The news lady, speaking outside the place claiming there is no word on motive, reasons, etc....completely with a straight face - meanwhile spraypainted on the building behind her is written "Fuck all crackers" and "Die crackers!"...
The first hit is always free for a reason...
I agree with the notion that this is retribution for speaking out against the illegals, after all, as you say, this really is the SOP for government and every single one of those bastards are doing this, and worse.
To be fair, on the other side - I saw T2 in the theaters. Incredible, still have found memories of it.
That moment, at the time, was met with the understanding that it was just an emotional women, venting on surface level shit they have no understanding of the deeper issues within it. She WAS crazy after all, even if they was correct in saying what had happened, what had happened had flipped her lid and go cray-cray.
The kid even had to snap her out of her emotional crap a few seconds after that, if I am not mistaken.
Just a friendly reminder that the CPC is just as much of globalists as the Liberals are - and when you see Canadian "journalist" attacking the CPC, think of it more like professional wrestling announcers feeding the storyline to the viewers, instead of anything to do with the truth.
CPC = Liberals, there is effective difference between the two other than the slogans they use, and the types of obfuscation.
Pierre's biggest claim is "Cut the tax", aka the carbon tax. Sounds great right, except he isn't proposing to cut the tax completely, only for certain seasons, and only for certain Canadians... because he can't cut the carbon tax without getting out of the UN climate accords, which they have point blank refused to do.
And that is before we get into him promoting direct flights from India to Canada to remove "the gatekeepers", his deputy PM promoted digital ID, and the party supports 15 min cities... All Globalist policies..
No it doesn't usually include those things, and even where they do PTO is different than sick days, they are accounted for completely differently.
Again, things you would know if you bothers trying to understand the issue instead of trying to justify your bad behavior.
You're better than that.
They have that right, UNTIL they give you their word/sign a contract that they will do something else, in return for something you are doing for them. Aka a contract.
Like an employment contract, so just because you don't feel like coming in, you still have to; and in case they don't feel like paying you(for whatever reason) they still have to..
Why can you not see that this is for the workers protection, and in return all you have to be is not a lying liar.
Why not add to it, you're already introducing something that wasn't stated(PTO) and isn't universal to justify you acting like a petulant little child and ignoring that this isn't about PTO but calling in sick when you're not.
What is it called when you claim something that isn't again? Lying.
Words have meanings, and you've outed yourself.
No goalposts have been moved..
If you enter into a contract, you have an obligation to live up to your end of the agreement. That hasn't changed, no goalposts were moved on my side.
Lets look at the other side... Since when is not living up to your word, a good thing to you? Defend that.
My god man, awesome read.
Thank you. That made my day.