Win / KotakuInAction2
KotakuInAction2
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
KotakuInAction2 The Official Gamergate Forum
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

108
Inspired by the covid version (media.scored.co)
posted 1 year ago by Inbredsandwich1 1 year ago by Inbredsandwich1 +108 / -0
30 comments share
30 comments share save hide report block hide replies
Comments (30)
sorted by:
▲ 33 ▼
– horstshort 33 points 1 year ago +33 / -0

Sure is impressive what 80 years of psychological warfare can achieve.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– PM-Melania-feet-pics 5 points 1 year ago +5 / -0

Demoralizing generation after generation from birth will do this.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– horstshort 3 points 1 year ago +3 / -0

Demoralizing is a cute term for literally making your own population the target of your psychological warfare department.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 22 ▼
– Guy_Incognito76 22 points 1 year ago +22 / -0

Does this include the requirement of swearing a loyalty pledge to Israel to receive hurricane relief funds?

permalink save report block reply
▲ 16 ▼
– LegateLanius 16 points 1 year ago +16 / -0

"Our greatest allys" Proceeds to do nothing for us, while we give them trillions in aid and taxes.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– PM-Melania-feet-pics 5 points 1 year ago +5 / -0

They helpfully conducted a live fire test of the USS Liberty's lifeboats and cleared out some real estate in Lower Manhattan, does that count?

Or what about sharing our classified military tech with China to give them a fighting chance in WW3?

You know, "ally" things.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– PM-Melania-feet-pics 4 points 1 year ago +4 / -0

There's not even the "stupid" argument anymore. Anyone who "doesn't see it" now is an enemy agent. End of.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– Kienan 3 points 1 year ago +3 / -0

The holocaust survivor interview, which OP obviously only included because he hates the Jews and...oh, wait. She says the liberation photos are blatant fakes.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Sumsuch 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0

I am rather suspicious about how unnatural all of these events feel. Almost like people are being blackmailed to behave in uncharacteristic ways in an attempt to build a false narrative designed to goad the public into civil war.

I'll wait for military intelligence to finally take the lead and prove that I'm off base on this, since they supposedly instigated all this.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Kienan 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0

I did find one inaccuracy. See my thread here.

The lightshow (marked "A", bottom left) is a total hoax, as far as I can tell. It's a crazy story, where someone used AI to create a viral event that never happened. Again, as far as I can tell. Most people are reporting it as real, but it doesn't seem to be.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Inbredsandwich1 [S] 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

Good find. It does say something however that of all the pictures that one would think are fake or ai, it was the lightshow of all things that was embellished lol. Wonder what I ought to replace that picture with if I ever update the post.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– AntonioOfVenice 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0

Imagine blindly believing what you read online.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 18 ▼
– Kienan 18 points 1 year ago +18 / -0

What is OP believing, and what isn't true?

Not an argument.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– AntonioOfVenice 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

What is he believing? Look at the image and see for yourself.

Is it not a little strange to you that the same online Nazis who claim to be "skeptical" blindly believe anything that suits their obsessions?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 13 ▼
– Kienan 13 points 1 year ago +13 / -0

You didn't answer the question, at all. What shouldn't OP believe in this post?

I don't recognize every image, but all the ones I do are true, although how much significance you read into each can vary:

Sewer Jews.

Bobby "I'll be a great president for Israel" Kennedy.

Trump at the Wall, Elon at Auschwitz.

Antisemitism EOs.

The, uh, controversial religious ceremony, let's say.

USS Liberty.

JFK.

Wooden doors.

Censorship.

Another weird ceremony.

Texas Governor and "Friend of Zion," declaring that "Anybody who is an enemy of Israel is an enemy of Texas."

Nazis...blindly believe anything that suits their obsessions?

I've called them out on that repeatedly; it's stupid and obnoxious. You're still not answering what OP is wrong about in this image.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– AntonioOfVenice 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

What shouldn't OP believe in this post?

That presumes that random images from anonymous people should be believed unless proven otherwise. I don't believe that is a correct presumption. That is reversing the burden of proof.

You're still not answering what OP is wrong about in this image.

Because the criticism was aimed at believing this crap. I don't think it's my job to refute a zero-effort image which the retarded OP did not even create.

But if you want. It's incoherent. Suspicious of what? They can never answer.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Kienan 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0

That presumes that random images from anonymous people should be believed unless proven otherwise.

But they're true. You're criticizing OP for believing them.

Because the criticism was aimed at believing this crap.

Then you should have made that argument. Instead you went with a whiny and pointed one, and one that was incorrect, that gets no one on your side.

But if you want. It's incoherent. Suspicious of what? They can never answer.

Zionism and its influence? There are clear themes here, it's really not a hard answer. Also, yes, two or three images about Jews as a whole. Which I don't agree with, but to be fair has been made pretty hard to separate...by the Zionists.

Even if you don't buy the full thing (and I agree, you probably shouldn't), there's plenty here that are obvious problems. Why should US presidential candidates swear fealty to Israel? Why should you essentially get whisked away to Israel or Poland if you say something Israel doesn't like? Why are there laws and social media manipulation to protect Jews and Israel specifically? Why are you an enemy of Texas if you criticize Israel? Why is said governor of Texas signing unconstitutional speech restrictions...in a foreign country? And so much more.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– AntonioOfVenice 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

Me: Because the criticism was aimed at believing this crap.

Then you should have made that argument

"Imagine blindly believing what you read online."

Well put, I think.

Zionism and its influence? There are clear themes here, it's really not a hard answer

Just 'Zionism'? Huh, pretty sure there was some holocaust denial in there. And attacks on American Jews.

Also, yes, two or three images about Jews as a whole. Which I don't agree with, but to be fair has been made pretty hard to separate...by the Zionists.

Not really. Unless you would agree with hard-line zionists that any criticism of Israel is anti-Semitism.

Even if you don't buy the full thing (and I agree, you probably shouldn't),

I doubt OP would agree with that.

Why should US presidential candidates swear fealty to Israel?

If that's it, then why is one of the images "Auschwitz survivor on TV"?

Why should they? Why do they? Probably because it's the popular position among voters, and more so because it's the popular position among moneyed interests. The policies of the military-industrial complex aren't exactly uncommon positions. Why was Donald Trump the first presidential candidate to break from the deeply unpopular 'foreign policy consensus'? And why was he not able to actually put his policies into practice when he became president the first time around, e.g. being friends with Russia?

Why are you an enemy of Texas if you criticize Israel?

Because it's a heavily evangelical state. Also, I'm pretty sure this is against boycotts of Israel by contractors of Texas. I don't find it quite as unreasonable to expect contractors to not boycott a country with public funds, though I'd rather that the "American right" target companies that boycott states in America for being sensible on troonydom.

Why is said governor of Texas signing unconstitutional speech restrictions...in a foreign country?

I think you could make a far more intelligent image than this. It helps to not be a gullible retard.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Kienan 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0

"Imagine blindly believing what you read online."

Except, again, the images are generally true, and you won't even refute it. That's why I'm saying it's not a convincing argument. You're saying OP shouldn't believe the image.

Just 'Zionism'?

I said primarily Zionism, and then went on to say - which you also quoted - that there was some general Jew stuff I don't even agree with. So, yeah, not "just Zionism," and I never said that.

Huh, pretty sure there was some holocaust denial in there.

Oh, come on. It's not holy, and I dislike any argument that tries to immediately shut down the discussion. It's like saying climate denial or science denial, or homophobia or racism. It's just an attack. You have two Holocaust-related pictures, as far as I can tell. The 'lampshades' thing, which has been pretty heavily debunked by now, as I understand, so at least that part should be "denied," because it's a lie. And then shower doors. Which is, if nothing else, weird. We can argue about how important it is, or what it means, but it's certainly strange. Am I denying the Holocaust too?

And attacks on American Jews.

Which?

Unless you would agree with hard-line zionists that any criticism of Israel is anti-Semitism.

I strongly disagree with them. But my point was they've muddied the waters. It doesn't matter if I agree or not, that's how many conversations go because others have been convinced. Jews and Zionism are obviously incredibly closely linked, and the Zionists love that, and do what they can to further conflate the two in all contexts.

I doubt OP would agree with that.

And I don't care. I wasn't here to agree with OP, I just didn't like your empty rebuttal, and wanted some clarification. For all I know OP thinks I'm a Zionist shill too. Wouldn't be the first time; I agree plenty on that side can be rather one-track, and you're either completely with them or completely against them. Again, I don't care what OP thinks. And it doesn't affect my argument in any way, if he agrees with me or not.

If that's it, then why is one of the images "Auschwitz survivor on TV"?

I don't know. I recognize the image, but don't remember the full context? What was she saying?

Also, the point I was making was about Zionist influence. Because I think that's the important part; why are so many US politicians swearing loyalty to a foreign power, and why are they so dedicated to stamping out specifically "antisemitism?" You say it's a popular position, but is it? To some extent, but does that make it better? Still seems like a massive problem, and "it's popular" isn't a good answer. Socialist "free shit" stuff like universal healthcare and UBI are fairly popular, since a bunch of people love the concept of "free" government gibs.

So, it doesn't matter if Zionism is "popular" or not, if it's a big problem. Which I'd argue it is. Just like I don't want government redistribution of wealth, I don't want my politicians loyal or beholden to a foreign power. That's a problem.

I think you could make a far more intelligent image than this. It helps to not be a gullible retard.

I probably could. But I'm just saying what the images OP posted represent. It's the same thing. That trip where Abbott got the Totally Bestest Zionist Ever award was the same trip he signed the antisemitism bill.

permalink parent save report block reply
... continue reading thread?
▲ 1 ▼
– SweaterAlready 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

Uh, oh, retard alert.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 7 ▼
– PM-Melania-feet-pics 7 points 1 year ago +7 / -0

As opposed to the mainstream press or textbook monopoly? Isn't that the entire point of what Gamergate started?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– AntonioOfVenice 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

You think the reason for Gamergate started was absolute credulity to any image you find online?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– PM-Melania-feet-pics 4 points 1 year ago +4 / -0

I don't know. All those articles saying "gamers are dead" can't all be wrong. /s

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– AntonioOfVenice 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

You don't know if you should blindly believe any online image that you see?

You're just as much of an NPC as the people you criticize, perhaps even more so.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– Euphemism 3 points 1 year ago +3 / -0

Who says it was blindly?

Clearly it wasn't, no matter how much certain groups which we were still blind to it..

permalink parent save report block reply

Original 8chan Links to Gamer Gate:

.

The main GG discussion is on the videogames board: https://8chan.moe/v/

.

GamerGate archive is at https://8chan.moe/gamergatehq/

.

GamerGate Wiki:

https://ggwiki.deepfreeze.it/index.php/Main_Page

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Rules:

.

ONE: Do not advocate for illegal violence or post other illegal activity. (Be aware of your local laws.)

.

TWO: Don't threaten, harass, or impersonate users. Also: don't be a psycho. New users will be held to a higher standard.

.

THREE: Do not post porn.

.

FOUR: NSFW/NSFL content must be flaired NSFW.

.

FIVE: No vote manipulation. Do not break communities.win's features.

.

SIX: No spam or reposts. Do not make more than 5 threads a day.

.

SEVEN: Do not post falsehoods and hoaxes that are obvious to an uncontroversial degree.

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Moderation Logs:

.

(Two different versions, Scored has more features and is cleaner, but .win let's you see a few more details in certain instances.)

  • Scored
  • .win

Moderators

  • DomitiusOfMassilia
  • C
  • BandageBandolier
  • CarmenOfSandiego
  • The_Shadow_of_Intent
  • SocraticMethod1
  • Kienan
  • Smith1980
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2026.02.01 - 8wn6p (status)

Copyright © 2026.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy