1
DomitiusOfMassilia [M] 1 point ago +1 / -0

Comment Reported for: Rule 3 - Harassment

This isn't technically harassment as it stands, however, please do not post about Graphenium any further.

1
DomitiusOfMassilia [M] 1 point ago +1 / -0

Where is this post at? I don't even see it in the mod log or queue

3
DomitiusOfMassilia 3 points ago +3 / -0

Could be any number of things, but you might not be an approved user. What is your username on Reddit?

-5
DomitiusOfMassilia [M] -5 points ago +2 / -7

Post Reported for:

  • Rule 11 - Spam
  • Rule 10 - Breaking .win sites
  • Troll user
  • Rule 3 - harassment

This could fall under the harassment clause of making posts about users, but I'm treating it as a Meta post.

1
DomitiusOfMassilia [M] 1 point ago +3 / -2

Comment Reported for:

  • Derailing, and threatening to derail
  • Offtopic sperging. Again.

Y'all need to look in a mirror.

This post is derailing the forum. This comment is interacting with derailing replies. As far as I can tell, this is a Subversion of Gaming forum that is dealing with 2 separate factions: blaming it on women & blaming it on blacks/jews.

That being said, this is a Rule 16 violation, as it is an allegation of exactly that: vast identity based conspiracy in an inter-termporal war.

Comment Removed.

-1
DomitiusOfMassilia [M] -1 points ago +1 / -2

Comment Reported for: Rule 2 - Violent Speech

burn in hell is not a direct call of violence because it is taking place in the after-life.

0
DomitiusOfMassilia 0 points ago +1 / -1

Comment Reported for: Rule 16 - Identity Attacks (x2)

This doesn't do that.

0
DomitiusOfMassilia [M] 0 points ago +1 / -1

Post Reported for: Nope, Imp is just a tunnel visioning retard

Post Removed for: Rule 16 - Identity Attacks

"Women's control of culture" is the issue. Vast sex conspiracy.

0
DomitiusOfMassilia [M] 0 points ago +1 / -1

Comment Reported for: Rule 16 - Identity Attacks

Comment Removed for: Rule 16 - Identity Attacks

Bears live in woods, and sharks live in water... you're going into their territory, not the other way around. Your analogy is bad.

0
DomitiusOfMassilia [M] 0 points ago +1 / -1

Comment Reported for: Rule 2 - Violent Speech

Comment Removed for: Rule 2 - Violent Speech

0
DomitiusOfMassilia [M] 0 points ago +1 / -1

Comment Reported for: Rule 16 - Identity Attacks

Comment Removed for: Rule 16 - Identity Attacks

0
DomitiusOfMassilia [M] 0 points ago +1 / -1

Comment Reported for:

  • Rule 16 - Identity Attacks
  • Rule 11 - Spam

Post Removed for: Rule 16 - Identity Attacks

1
DomitiusOfMassilia [M] 1 point ago +1 / -0

Comment Reported for: Rule 2 - Violent Speech

It actually sounds like the opposite.

Also, I am a dragon now. rawr.

I am very oppressed by humans

1
DomitiusOfMassilia 1 point ago +2 / -1

Comment Reported for: Rule 16 - Identity Attacks

Comment Removed for: Rule 16 - Identity Attacks

Most of this is a theological argument that's fine. The issue is the sentence regarding the idea that modern jews called for Jesus' death. There actually is a problem with that asserting that all modern jews want Jesus either tacitly or directly to be killed. It's an intertermporal moral claim. The forward application of guilt through time violates the rule, also the breadth of the claim (clearly not all jews wanted Jesus dead in his time, which is why he had followers).

1
DomitiusOfMassilia [M] 1 point ago +1 / -0

Comment Reported for: Rule 2 - Violent Speech

Comment Removed for: Rule 2 - Violent Speech

Call for violence

3
DomitiusOfMassilia [M] 3 points ago +3 / -0

Comment Reported for: Rule 12 - Disinfo

Comment Removed for: Rule 12 - Disinfo

Again, it looks like you know he's a Christian, even from what's in the video, but then you're trying to assert he's jewish because you can claim that a similar name is theoretically jewish, and he uses a word that you think appears in jewish texts.

This is some actual conspiratard nonsense.

2
DomitiusOfMassilia [M] 2 points ago +2 / -0

Comment Reported for: Rule 12 - Disinfo

Disinfo: https://youtu.be/em1asOGapH0?si=LAJM3r-Ghyyp07Hc&t=494

Comment Removed for: Rule 12 - Disinfo

Looks like you intentionally spread information you knew to be false. You know Metatron doesn't personally know Mr. Lockley, but concluded on the basis that emails were sent that that was a "personal" relationship.

-1
DomitiusOfMassilia -1 points ago +1 / -2

We've definitely gone through several accounts.

I remember banning multiple variants of your username permanently, while trying to keep the original one on the correct ban scale, but I think you had a second alt which had a different ban scale and that's when I decided we should just stick with this one.

It's possible that those were all just other people pretending to be you or something.

And I don't see this as an 'attack' on you.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›