13
ApparentlyImAHeretic 13 points ago +13 / -0

most of the people generating pictures probably don't even realize that prompts and generation data are embedded in the image metadata anyway. if they're using an online service to generate AI images, this metadata almost certainly includes their account, IP address, and any other identifying information.

1
ApparentlyImAHeretic 1 point ago +2 / -1

I really can't comment on your sexuality as I have no data on the subject, but your post certainly cements you as a faggot.

1
ApparentlyImAHeretic 1 point ago +1 / -0

my child you mustn't avert your eyes from the truth. endeavor to gaze upon that which is unholy, that you may recognize it.

1
ApparentlyImAHeretic 1 point ago +2 / -1

you wouldn't know a nigger if one stared back at you from the mirror

2
ApparentlyImAHeretic 2 points ago +3 / -1

fed

but yeah, most people left after the mods ended up being faggots, surprise surprise

4
ApparentlyImAHeretic 4 points ago +4 / -0

I know I wasn't asked, but I'll answer anyway.

I've known several cops in my life and they've arranged from massive faggots to legitimate protectors of the community. in my experience, it all depends on the jurisdiction, and I know for a fact my jurisdiction's police have my back.

5
ApparentlyImAHeretic 5 points ago +5 / -0

Yup. they will probably make exceptions for blunt swords so that they can keep their Olympic fencers. the HEMA and WMA communities might be toast, at the very least they can absolutely say goodbye to cutting competitions.

4
ApparentlyImAHeretic 4 points ago +4 / -0

I still follow him because he seems to be knowledgeable about swords and their history, even if he is a major cuck. I can tell you that everything that he talks about in this video is genuine.

7
ApparentlyImAHeretic 7 points ago +7 / -0

I might not have made it clear in my title, but this guy is talking about swords and knives, and never mentions guns in America. if you play mad libs with his video and replace sword with gun etc, he's basically repeating all of the good arguments for not banning semi-automatic rifles.

7
ApparentlyImAHeretic 7 points ago +7 / -0

depends how entrenched the federal government of a country is. when the United States was founded, it was definitely intended to be a partnership of multiple States. in being a partnership, any states that voted to back out could do so.

the US civil war changed that. now, instead of a partnership of states, we are One Nation divided by extremely soft borders, and that one nation is entirely at the whims of the federal government.

secession in the former can easily be done without blood. secession in the latter basically guarantees a war.

19
ApparentlyImAHeretic 19 points ago +19 / -0

The worst thing about the aftermath of the US Civil War was the fact that secession is now synonymous with war. It wasn't like that in the original founding.

30
ApparentlyImAHeretic 30 points ago +30 / -0

the fact that they got as far as they did already exceeded my expectations.

17
ApparentlyImAHeretic 17 points ago +17 / -0

oh when simply lying was considered a scandal.

1
ApparentlyImAHeretic 1 point ago +1 / -0

again, nice straw man. I would never bully anyone with mental illness. Were it my responsibility, I would do what it takes to treat them. I would never set them up for failure or drug dependence. I specially would never instruct them to self-mutilate.

2
ApparentlyImAHeretic 2 points ago +2 / -0

nice straw man, you don't even know me.

I supported the right of homosexual people to marry in California while that proposal was still being struck down by popular vote. I have since come to realize that the feds have no business in saying who marries who.

3
ApparentlyImAHeretic 3 points ago +3 / -0

if you are infertile then you are a broken man or a broken woman, but a man or woman nonetheless.

as for who takes care of the children, that's irrelevant and not defined by sex or gender. many cultures in the past indeed had women take care of the children while men gathered resources and built wealth because it was convenient. modern conveniences eliminate the need for this, though many people still choose it because it drives with the instincts that we have fostered over millions of years.

there's nothing about how you act or what you do that determines if you are a man or a woman.

3
ApparentlyImAHeretic 3 points ago +3 / -0

John money coined the phrase is gender role and sexual orientation. sources claim that he is not associated with the term gender identity, but the same sources do not name who did coin the term and do say the term came about in the 1960s, the period while money was doing his """"research"""". https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Money

this research involved The grooming of David Reimer into thinking he was a girl, which ultimately failed because Reimer had a brain. nonetheless, money use this abuse to insist it was proof of gender identity. this declaration was made around the same time that, according to Reimer, he and his brother were made to do sexually suggestive things to each other by Money. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Reimer

of course the pedophile mods at Wikipedia will never let the sexual abuse allegations see the light of day on their website. https://www.psychophilics.com/post/dangerous-dogmas-the-tragedy-of-david-reimer

why I'm arguing this with you still, I don't know. you've clearly demonstrated your willingness to ignore reality.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›