Collectivism isn't bad. If the leader represents you it can be a great thing.
I've never known a collectivist leader to be legit. at the macro scale, they tend to lead their people to starvation. at the micro scale, they're almost always feds.
Individualist ideologies like libertarianism make people easier to conquer.
Only if the people don't pay attention, and that is not a problem exclusive to libertarianism. whether or not a people can be conquered is dependent on the people's strength of will, sense of community, and vigilance. identifying and casting out bad actors is crucial. if you use skin color for this filter, you will cast out innocents and overlook the spies and saboteurs.
if you race mix, you split your loyalties
sorry, but I don't feel like aligning with white college liberals or white trailer trash junkies. other than the fact that we vaguely look alike, we have nothing in common.
I would much rather align with people who want the country to be free, secure, and stable, and are of sound moral character. Whether they're white, asian, hispanic, or even black, it makes no difference to me.
No group will trust you or your kids
correction: no racist group will trust me or my kids. thankfully, my community is not racist and we are very stable.
You will know they are executing on that property plan when they lower the property tax. the property tax in California is high enough to rival the mortgages of houses in other states, but they don't collect on it because houses don't get reassessed until they are sold. that's why you have a bunch of old people living in California and not moving, they're holding on to their insanely low property tax based on an assessment from 30 years ago.
the moment they get rid of that and lower the property tax in general, or at least say they're going to, is when they will squeeze that profit
it's almost as if the word isn't what's bad, but the connotation behind it.
good lad
Ah, I remember that one now. that shit was infuriating. he was backing up, and deployed bear spray when agitators got too close. the agitators then shot him and celebrated the murder.
the Court's probably use the bear spray as an excuse to make it self defense, and the family probably didn't have the money to appeal. a travesty of Justice.
based chinks!
screenshot
post the link or archive.
not suspicious at all.
There is no moral dilemma about exposing and cancelling people who literally advocate for murder.
Culture is definitely commoditized in the states. Every small town and city feels the same.
I see it less as courting the inmate vote and more as undermining the lefts BLM messaging. Harris is on record sending innocent people to prison, mostly black people. She did this to further her career. the fact that she even became vice president is proof that the Democrats don't actually care about black people.
we all knew this, but this is a way of exposing it to the normies.
I don't hate Jews, I just hate Israel.
that's usually come out of the woodwork during election season. in 2020 it was flat earthers and the like. now it feels like they've sick Patriot Front and Indian consultants on us.
because it was trained to
low IQs love absolutes and polarization. it simplifies the world to the point where they can talk about society and think they're smart.
Which means a black baby born and raised amongst a civilized society will always be better than a white baby born and raised in a trash society.
I can recognize a pack of goons a mile away too. The difference being, I can recognize goons even when they are white.
How convenient it is that these texts were published by the church, who just so happen to be the gateway to god, apparently.
responsibilities and obligations to whoY?
Theocratic people would say God.
(Actual) Fascists would say The State.
Communists would say the People.
These are all excuses to enslave people to serve a master.
The real answer, in my opinion, is to yourself, your family, and your friends.
notice that I actually answered the question before pointing out the diversionary debate tactic. You just keep repeating the "no you!" bullshit.
As for "gish gallop", he was referencing a completely different conversation, misrepresenting my position in that conversation, and using that strawman to attack my character. I simply addressed that dishonest tactic.
and finally, notice how there was never a refutation of my "ringleader" argument. Just ad hominem whataboutism.
what video?
it's literally in the OP pic
you created these rules, we're just following them
with the Alex Jones case precedent, they have the right to get a million billion dollars out of every news outlet that claims it was fake.
complaining works